-
Something wrong with this record ?
Exploring Multi-Pathology Brain Segmentation: From Volume-Based to Component-Based Deep Learning Analysis
I. Stathopoulos, R. Stoklasa, MA. Kouri, G. Velonakis, E. Karavasilis, E. Efstathopoulos, L. Serio
Status not-indexed Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2015
PubMed Central
from 2019
ProQuest Central
from 2015-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2015
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Detection and segmentation of brain abnormalities using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an important task that, nowadays, the role of AI algorithms as supporting tools is well established both at the research and clinical-production level. While the performance of the state-of-the-art models is increasing, reaching radiologists and other experts' accuracy levels in many cases, there is still a lot of research needed on the direction of in-depth and transparent evaluation of the correct results and failures, especially in relation to important aspects of the radiological practice: abnormality position, intensity level, and volume. In this work, we focus on the analysis of the segmentation results of a pre-trained U-net model trained and validated on brain MRI examinations containing four different pathologies: Tumors, Strokes, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and White Matter Hyperintensities (WMH). We present the segmentation results for both the whole abnormal volume and for each abnormal component inside the examinations of the validation set. In the first case, a dice score coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, and precision of 0.76, 0.78, and 0.82, respectively, were found, while in the second case the model detected and segmented correct (True positives) the 48.8% (DSC ≥ 0.5) of abnormal components, partially correct the 27.1% (0.05 > DSC > 0.5), and missed (False Negatives) the 24.1%, while it produced 25.1% False Positives. Finally, we present an extended analysis between the True positives, False Negatives, and False positives versus their position inside the brain, their intensity at three MRI modalities (FLAIR, T2, and T1ce) and their volume.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25008752
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250422095826.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250408s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/jimaging11010006 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39852319
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Stathopoulos, Ioannis $u 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece $u Technology Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000277697534
- 245 10
- $a Exploring Multi-Pathology Brain Segmentation: From Volume-Based to Component-Based Deep Learning Analysis / $c I. Stathopoulos, R. Stoklasa, MA. Kouri, G. Velonakis, E. Karavasilis, E. Efstathopoulos, L. Serio
- 520 9_
- $a Detection and segmentation of brain abnormalities using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an important task that, nowadays, the role of AI algorithms as supporting tools is well established both at the research and clinical-production level. While the performance of the state-of-the-art models is increasing, reaching radiologists and other experts' accuracy levels in many cases, there is still a lot of research needed on the direction of in-depth and transparent evaluation of the correct results and failures, especially in relation to important aspects of the radiological practice: abnormality position, intensity level, and volume. In this work, we focus on the analysis of the segmentation results of a pre-trained U-net model trained and validated on brain MRI examinations containing four different pathologies: Tumors, Strokes, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and White Matter Hyperintensities (WMH). We present the segmentation results for both the whole abnormal volume and for each abnormal component inside the examinations of the validation set. In the first case, a dice score coefficient (DSC), sensitivity, and precision of 0.76, 0.78, and 0.82, respectively, were found, while in the second case the model detected and segmented correct (True positives) the 48.8% (DSC ≥ 0.5) of abnormal components, partially correct the 27.1% (0.05 > DSC > 0.5), and missed (False Negatives) the 24.1%, while it produced 25.1% False Positives. Finally, we present an extended analysis between the True positives, False Negatives, and False positives versus their position inside the brain, their intensity at three MRI modalities (FLAIR, T2, and T1ce) and their volume.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Stoklasa, Roman $u Technology Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland $u Centre for Biomedical Image Analysis, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000239398824
- 700 1_
- $a Kouri, Maria Anthi $u 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece $1 https://orcid.org/0000000232963317
- 700 1_
- $a Velonakis, Georgios $u 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece $1 https://orcid.org/000000020050284X
- 700 1_
- $a Karavasilis, Efstratios $u Medical Physics Laboratory, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece $1 https://orcid.org/0000000272912231
- 700 1_
- $a Efstathopoulos, Efstathios $u 2nd Department of Radiology, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece $1 https://orcid.org/0000000327473353
- 700 1_
- $a Serio, Luigi $u Technology Department, CERN, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland $1 https://orcid.org/0000000293462663
- 773 0_
- $w MED00216297 $t Journal of imaging $x 2313-433X $g Roč. 11, č. 1 (2024)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39852319 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250422095828 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2306474 $s 1245827
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 11 $c 1 $e 20241231 $i 2313-433X $m Journal of imaging $n J Imaging $x MED00216297
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250408