-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapies followed by radical cystectomy in oligometastatic bladder cancer
A. Cadenar, S. Mancon, SF. Shariat, D. D'Andrea
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
- MeSH
- adjuvantní chemoterapie metody MeSH
- cystektomie * metody MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře * patologie terapie chirurgie MeSH
- neoadjuvantní terapie * metody MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC. RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC. SUMMARY: There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.
Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia Czechia
Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA
Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25009679
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250429134547.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250415s2025 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001261 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39820224
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Cadenar, Anna $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence
- 245 10
- $a Is there a role for neoadjuvant therapies followed by radical cystectomy in oligometastatic bladder cancer / $c A. Cadenar, S. Mancon, SF. Shariat, D. D'Andrea
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) for oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) treatment. We focused on extrapolating evidence from studies including lymph node-positive only and metastatic bladder cancer to address the key challenges and therapeutic strategies for OMBC. RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence for NAC and RC in OMBC is limited, with most data derived from studies in locally advanced bladder cancer. NAC has shown efficacy in downstaging and improving survival in patients with locally advanced disease, but its benefits in OMBC remain speculative. Additionally, diagnostic uncertainties, particularly regarding the inclusion of pelvic lymph nodes and the role of FDG-PET/CT, pose significant challenges to accurate staging and treatment decisions. Recent studies highlight the potential of metastasis-directed therapy, but uncertainties remain on patient selection and treatment protocols for OMBC. SUMMARY: There is need for prospective studies to evaluate neoadjuvant systemic treatments and RC specifically in OMBC. Moreover, resolving current diagnostic challenges is crucial to avoid undertreatment due to inaccurate staging. Until more concrete evidence emerges, changes to standard treatment protocols should be approached with caution and offered only within trials.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x patologie $x terapie $x chirurgie $7 D001749
- 650 12
- $a neoadjuvantní terapie $x metody $7 D020360
- 650 12
- $a cystektomie $x metody $7 D015653
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvantní chemoterapie $x metody $7 D017024
- 650 _2
- $a staging nádorů $7 D009367
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Mancon, Stefano $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA $u Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia, Czechia $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan $u Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria $u Research Center for Evidence Medicine, Urology Department Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- 700 1_
- $a D'Andrea, David $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001296 $t Current opinion in urology $x 1473-6586 $g Roč. 35, č. 2 (2025), s. 189-193
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39820224 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250415 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250429134543 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2311197 $s 1246760
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 35 $c 2 $d 189-193 $e 20250116 $i 1473-6586 $m Current opinion in urology $n Curr Opin Urol $x MED00001296
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250415