• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Gender differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis at specialist versus primary/secondary care centres: A sub-analysis of the IMPULSE enhanced registry

S. Bleiziffer, D. Messika-Zeitoun, R. Steeds, C. Appleby, V. Delgado, H. Eltchaninoff, C. Gebhard, C. Hengstenberg, W. Wojakowski, N. Frey, J. Kurucova, P. Bramlage, TK. Rudolph

. 2025 ; 430 (-) : 133223. [pub] 20250330

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, srovnávací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015211

BACKGROUND: Management and treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) may differ considerably in European countries. To investigate these differences in France, Germany, and the UK, the IMPULSE enhanced registry was established. Previous data revealed differences in how patients were managed in specialist (hub) versus primary/secondary care (satellite) centres. METHODS: The IMPULSE enhanced registry sub-analysis aimed to determine if there were gender-specific differences for patients with severe AS at centres with and without access to intervention. RESULTS: Among the 790 patients, 594 and 196 were recruited at hub and satellite centres, respectively; 44 % of patients were female. In both settings, women were older than men (hubs: 78.7 vs. 76.2, p = 0.007; satellites: 79.8 vs. 75.1, p = 0.002). Symptoms at the presentation were comparable. Males had more often undergone previous cardiac surgery. Females had a smaller left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, smaller LV cavities, and, more often, a preserved ejection fraction (>50 %). There was no gender-based difference in time to intervention. At one year, the cumulative incidence of aortic valve replacement in females was higher than in males in hubs (p = 0.012) but not in satellites (p = 0.600); surgical AVR was more common in males in hubs only (p = 0.008), while transcatheter aortic valve implantation was more common in females in both settings (hubs: p < 0.001; satellites: p = 0.022). One-year survival was comparable in both genders, regardless of setting. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of gender-specific differences in patients with severe AS, according to the diagnostic setting, could improve patient stratification and earlier diagnosis.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015211
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731090833.0
007      
ta
008      
250708e20250330ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133223 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40169038
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Bleiziffer, Sabine $u Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Diabetes Centre North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bad Oeynhausen, Germany. Electronic address: sbleiziffer@hdz-nrw.de
245    10
$a Gender differences in the presentation and management of patients with severe aortic stenosis at specialist versus primary/secondary care centres: A sub-analysis of the IMPULSE enhanced registry / $c S. Bleiziffer, D. Messika-Zeitoun, R. Steeds, C. Appleby, V. Delgado, H. Eltchaninoff, C. Gebhard, C. Hengstenberg, W. Wojakowski, N. Frey, J. Kurucova, P. Bramlage, TK. Rudolph
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Management and treatment of severe aortic stenosis (AS) may differ considerably in European countries. To investigate these differences in France, Germany, and the UK, the IMPULSE enhanced registry was established. Previous data revealed differences in how patients were managed in specialist (hub) versus primary/secondary care (satellite) centres. METHODS: The IMPULSE enhanced registry sub-analysis aimed to determine if there were gender-specific differences for patients with severe AS at centres with and without access to intervention. RESULTS: Among the 790 patients, 594 and 196 were recruited at hub and satellite centres, respectively; 44 % of patients were female. In both settings, women were older than men (hubs: 78.7 vs. 76.2, p = 0.007; satellites: 79.8 vs. 75.1, p = 0.002). Symptoms at the presentation were comparable. Males had more often undergone previous cardiac surgery. Females had a smaller left ventricular (LV) outflow tract, smaller LV cavities, and, more often, a preserved ejection fraction (>50 %). There was no gender-based difference in time to intervention. At one year, the cumulative incidence of aortic valve replacement in females was higher than in males in hubs (p = 0.012) but not in satellites (p = 0.600); surgical AVR was more common in males in hubs only (p = 0.008), while transcatheter aortic valve implantation was more common in females in both settings (hubs: p < 0.001; satellites: p = 0.022). One-year survival was comparable in both genders, regardless of setting. CONCLUSIONS: A better understanding of gender-specific differences in patients with severe AS, according to the diagnostic setting, could improve patient stratification and earlier diagnosis.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a aortální stenóza $x epidemiologie $x diagnóza $x terapie $x chirurgie $7 D001024
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a primární zdravotní péče $x trendy $7 D011320
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    12
$a sekundární péče $x trendy $7 D063127
650    _2
$a sexuální faktory $7 D012737
650    12
$a management nemoci $7 D019468
650    12
$a pohlavní dimorfismus $7 D012727
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
651    _2
$a Francie $x epidemiologie $7 D005602
651    _2
$a Německo $x epidemiologie $7 D005858
651    _2
$a Spojené království $x epidemiologie $7 D006113
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Messika-Zeitoun, David $u Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada. Electronic address: dmessika-zeitoun@ottawaheart.ca
700    1_
$a Steeds, Rick $u Department of Cardiology (QEHB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: rick.steeds@uhb.nhs.uk
700    1_
$a Appleby, Clare $u Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Thomas Dr, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK. Electronic address: clare.appleby@lhch.nhs.uk
700    1_
$a Delgado, Victoria $u Heart Institute, Department of Cardiology, Hospital University Germans Trias i Pujol Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: videlga@gmail.com
700    1_
$a Eltchaninoff, Helene $u Normandie University, UNIROUEN, U1096, CHU Rouen, Department of Cardiology, F-76000 Rouen, France. Electronic address: helene.eltchaninoff@chu-rouen.fr
700    1_
$a Gebhard, Catherine $u Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: catherine.gebhard@insel.ch
700    1_
$a Hengstenberg, Christian $u Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: christian.hengstenberg@meduniwien.ac.at
700    1_
$a Wojakowski, Wojtek $u Division of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia, Ziolowa 45/47, Katowice 40-635, Poland. Electronic address: wojtek.wojakowski@gmail.com
700    1_
$a Frey, Norbert $u Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: norbert.frey@med.uni-heidelberg.de
700    1_
$a Kurucova, Jana $u Edwards Lifesciences, 18600 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jana_kurucova@edwards.com
700    1_
$a Bramlage, Peter $u Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg, Germany. Electronic address: peter.bramlage@ippmed.de
700    1_
$a Rudolph, Tanja K $u General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre, North Rhine-Westphalia, Bad Oeynhausen, Ruhr-University, Germany. Electronic address: trudolph@hdz-nrw.de
773    0_
$w MED00002299 $t International journal of cardiology $x 1874-1754 $g Roč. 430 (20250330), s. 133223
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40169038 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731090828 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366206 $s 1252336
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 430 $c - $d 133223 $e 20250330 $i 1874-1754 $m International journal of cardiology $n Int J Cardiol $x MED00002299
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace