• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Postoperative quality of life in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A prospective 10-year follow-up study

K. Maxova, M. Rehackova, M. Jirkovska, H. Robova, L. Rob, MJ. Halaska

. 2025 ; 51 (6) : 110119. [pub] 20250505

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc25015441

INTRODUCTION: The substantial improvement in early-stage cervical cancer survival rates has given rise to the significance of subsequent quality of life. This study aims to assess the quality of life in patients subjected to radical and conservative surgeries for cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer (stages IA2-IIA1) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in our study between 2007 and 2011. Patients completed quality of life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24, distributed before the surgery, 6, 12, and 120 months after the procedure. At the final 120-month follow-up, 54 patients remained eligible for inclusion. 23 patients ("CONS group") underwent laparoscopic lymphadenectomy combined with hysterectomy or simple trachelectomy. The remaining 31 patients ("RAD group") underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy type C1. RESULTS: At the 6-month post-surgery assessment, the RAD group reported a significantly higher incidence of menopausal symptoms, decline in physical functioning and concern regarding their sexual well-being. CONS group patients reported notable exacerbation of lymphedema and neuropathy-related symptoms but only a slight decline in physical functioning. Additionally, their role functioning, emotional well-being, and social functioning significantly improved compared to their preoperative baseline. At the 120-month postoperative assessment the RAD group showed a significant decline in several parameters, including lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy, postmenopausal symptoms, fatigue, pain, and physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer treatment is invariably associated with a negative long-term impact on quality of life, RAD group demonstrated poorer outcomes than the CONS group across multiple parameters but even the CONS group exhibited long-term effects of the surgery.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015441
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731090959.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110119 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40347592
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Maxova, Katerina $u Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Postoperative quality of life in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A prospective 10-year follow-up study / $c K. Maxova, M. Rehackova, M. Jirkovska, H. Robova, L. Rob, MJ. Halaska
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: The substantial improvement in early-stage cervical cancer survival rates has given rise to the significance of subsequent quality of life. This study aims to assess the quality of life in patients subjected to radical and conservative surgeries for cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred patients diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancer (stages IA2-IIA1) undergoing surgical treatment were enrolled in our study between 2007 and 2011. Patients completed quality of life questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24, distributed before the surgery, 6, 12, and 120 months after the procedure. At the final 120-month follow-up, 54 patients remained eligible for inclusion. 23 patients ("CONS group") underwent laparoscopic lymphadenectomy combined with hysterectomy or simple trachelectomy. The remaining 31 patients ("RAD group") underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy type C1. RESULTS: At the 6-month post-surgery assessment, the RAD group reported a significantly higher incidence of menopausal symptoms, decline in physical functioning and concern regarding their sexual well-being. CONS group patients reported notable exacerbation of lymphedema and neuropathy-related symptoms but only a slight decline in physical functioning. Additionally, their role functioning, emotional well-being, and social functioning significantly improved compared to their preoperative baseline. At the 120-month postoperative assessment the RAD group showed a significant decline in several parameters, including lymphedema, peripheral neuropathy, postmenopausal symptoms, fatigue, pain, and physical functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical cancer treatment is invariably associated with a negative long-term impact on quality of life, RAD group demonstrated poorer outcomes than the CONS group across multiple parameters but even the CONS group exhibited long-term effects of the surgery.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    12
$a nádory děložního čípku $x chirurgie $x patologie $x psychologie $7 D002583
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a hysterektomie $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D007044
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a lymfadenektomie $x metody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D008197
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a staging nádorů $7 D009367
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a trachelektomie $7 D000069339
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $7 D010535
650    _2
$a pooperační období $7 D011184
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $7 D011183
650    _2
$a lymfedém $x etiologie $x epidemiologie $7 D008209
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Rehackova, Martina $u Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jirkovska, Michaela $u Dept. of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Motol, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Robova, Helena $u Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Rob, Lukas $u Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Halaska, Michael J $u Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: mhalaska@seznam.cz
773    0_
$w MED00005360 $t European journal of surgical oncology $x 1532-2157 $g Roč. 51, č. 6 (2025), s. 110119
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40347592 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731090954 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366335 $s 1252566
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 51 $c 6 $d 110119 $e 20250505 $i 1532-2157 $m European journal of surgical oncology $n Eur J Surg Oncol $x MED00005360
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...