• Something wrong with this record ?

A call for better data for surveillance and evaluation of caesarean sections in Europe - A joint statement by Euro-Peristat and European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG)

P. Velebil, M. Durox, J. Zeitlin, T. Mahmood, Euro-Peristat Research Group

. 2025 ; 309 (-) : 168-174. [pub] 20250226

Language English Country Ireland

Document type Journal Article, Review

International comparisons highlight differences in healthcare practices, raising questions about the application of evidence-based care when wide variations exist between countries with similar populations and income levels. Caesarean section (CS) rates show significant variation, with national and regional averages differing widely. As a common surgical procedure, this variation affects a large number of people and may have major consequences for maternal and newborn health. Comparable health indicators are essential to analyse CS rates and understand the reasons for this variability. A review of data on CS rates in Europe in international databases, such as those maintained by Eurostat, OECD and WHO, confirmed wide variation in CS rates in Europe, from 16% to over 50%, but showed very limited data available to understand these differences. In contrast, many European countries collect a wide array of data in national health information systems which can be used to investigate variations in CS, including on the timing and indication of the CS, and key population and health system characteristics that affect risks of CS. Based on the published literature, work in the Euro-Peristat network and within the EBCOG advisory board, we propose a list of data items that should be available at the national and international levels to allow comprehensive international surveillance and evaluation of CS practices.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25015887
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731091325.0
007      
ta
008      
250708e20250226ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.02.056 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)40157224
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Velebil, Petr $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic; Chair EBCOG Standing Committee of Training Recognition, Czech Republic; 3rd Medical School of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
245    12
$a A call for better data for surveillance and evaluation of caesarean sections in Europe - A joint statement by Euro-Peristat and European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) / $c P. Velebil, M. Durox, J. Zeitlin, T. Mahmood, Euro-Peristat Research Group
520    9_
$a International comparisons highlight differences in healthcare practices, raising questions about the application of evidence-based care when wide variations exist between countries with similar populations and income levels. Caesarean section (CS) rates show significant variation, with national and regional averages differing widely. As a common surgical procedure, this variation affects a large number of people and may have major consequences for maternal and newborn health. Comparable health indicators are essential to analyse CS rates and understand the reasons for this variability. A review of data on CS rates in Europe in international databases, such as those maintained by Eurostat, OECD and WHO, confirmed wide variation in CS rates in Europe, from 16% to over 50%, but showed very limited data available to understand these differences. In contrast, many European countries collect a wide array of data in national health information systems which can be used to investigate variations in CS, including on the timing and indication of the CS, and key population and health system characteristics that affect risks of CS. Based on the published literature, work in the Euro-Peristat network and within the EBCOG advisory board, we propose a list of data items that should be available at the national and international levels to allow comprehensive international surveillance and evaluation of CS practices.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a císařský řez $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D002585
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
651    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Durox, Melanie $u Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research for Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-UMR1153), Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Lifecourse Epidemiology (OPPaLE), F-75014 Paris, France
700    1_
$a Zeitlin, Jennifer $u Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research for Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS-UMR1153), Obstetrical, Perinatal and Pediatric Lifecourse Epidemiology (OPPaLE), F-75014 Paris, France. Electronic address: jennifer.zeitlin@inserm.fr
700    1_
$a Mahmood, Tahir $u Spire Murrayfield Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Chair EBCOG Standing Committee on Standards of Care and Position Statements, United Kingdom
710    2_
$a Euro-Peristat Research Group
773    0_
$w MED00001632 $t European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $x 1872-7654 $g Roč. 309 (20250226), s. 168-174
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40157224 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731091319 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366607 $s 1253012
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 309 $c - $d 168-174 $e 20250226 $i 1872-7654 $m European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $n Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol $x MED00001632
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...