• Something wrong with this record ?

How can we reduce healthcare costs by using Enhanced Recovery After Surgery more effectively in different groups of gynaecological patients? A single-centre experience

M. Polková, P. Koliba, P. Kabele, O. Dubová, D. Hodyc, MK. Škodová, M. Zikán, P. Sládková, M. Tichá, T. Brtnický

. 2025 ; 31 (3) : e14196. [pub] 20241018

Language English

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
NU21-03-00014 Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
24-IGS02-36 Internal Project of Bulovka University Hospital
FNBul Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization
00064211 Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme implementation on treatment costs at a university-type centre, using the DRG scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' data in a group of 604 individuals enroled in the study. We evaluated three groups of patients according to the ERAS clinical protocol (CP): (1) CP oncogynaecology, (2) CP simple hysterectomy, (3) CP laparoscopy. The study aimed to evaluate the impact on the length of stay (LOS), savings in bed-days, and the reduction in direct treatment costs. Three parameters-antibiotic consumption, blood derivative consumption and laboratory test costs-were chosen to compare direct treatment costs. The statistical significance of the difference in the observed parameters was tested by a two-sample unpaired t test with unequal variances at the 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: We analysed data from 604 patients. In all three groups, the length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced. The most significant reduction was observed in the CP oncogynaecology group, where the LOS was reduced from 11.1 days to 6.8 days (2022) and 7.6 days (2023) compared to 2019 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a notable reduction in inpatient bed-days, which resulted in the capacity being made available to admit additional patients. A statistically significant reduction in direct costs was observed in the group of CP hysterectomy (antibiotic use) and in the CP laparoscopy (laboratory test costs). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ERAS principles resulted in a number of significant positive economic impacts-reduction in the LOS and a corresponding increase in bed capacity for new patients. Additionally, direct treatment costs, including those related to antibiotic use or laboratory testing were reduced. The Czech Republic's acute healthcare system, like the majority of European healthcare systems, is financed by the DRG system. This flat-rate payment per patient encourages hospital management to seek cost-reduction strategies. The results of our study indicate that fast-track protocols represent a potential viable approach to reducing the cost of treatment while simultaneously meeting the recommendations of evidence-based medicine.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc25016313
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250731092820.0
007      
ta
008      
250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jep.14196 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39420795
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a x
100    1_
$a Polková, Markéta $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000945811994
245    10
$a How can we reduce healthcare costs by using Enhanced Recovery After Surgery more effectively in different groups of gynaecological patients? A single-centre experience / $c M. Polková, P. Koliba, P. Kabele, O. Dubová, D. Hodyc, MK. Škodová, M. Zikán, P. Sládková, M. Tichá, T. Brtnický
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme implementation on treatment costs at a university-type centre, using the DRG scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' data in a group of 604 individuals enroled in the study. We evaluated three groups of patients according to the ERAS clinical protocol (CP): (1) CP oncogynaecology, (2) CP simple hysterectomy, (3) CP laparoscopy. The study aimed to evaluate the impact on the length of stay (LOS), savings in bed-days, and the reduction in direct treatment costs. Three parameters-antibiotic consumption, blood derivative consumption and laboratory test costs-were chosen to compare direct treatment costs. The statistical significance of the difference in the observed parameters was tested by a two-sample unpaired t test with unequal variances at the 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: We analysed data from 604 patients. In all three groups, the length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced. The most significant reduction was observed in the CP oncogynaecology group, where the LOS was reduced from 11.1 days to 6.8 days (2022) and 7.6 days (2023) compared to 2019 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a notable reduction in inpatient bed-days, which resulted in the capacity being made available to admit additional patients. A statistically significant reduction in direct costs was observed in the group of CP hysterectomy (antibiotic use) and in the CP laparoscopy (laboratory test costs). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ERAS principles resulted in a number of significant positive economic impacts-reduction in the LOS and a corresponding increase in bed capacity for new patients. Additionally, direct treatment costs, including those related to antibiotic use or laboratory testing were reduced. The Czech Republic's acute healthcare system, like the majority of European healthcare systems, is financed by the DRG system. This flat-rate payment per patient encourages hospital management to seek cost-reduction strategies. The results of our study indicate that fast-track protocols represent a potential viable approach to reducing the cost of treatment while simultaneously meeting the recommendations of evidence-based medicine.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a délka pobytu $x statistika a číselné údaje $x ekonomika $7 D007902
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a urychlená pooperační rehabilitace $7 D000080482
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    12
$a náklady na zdravotní péči $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D017048
650    12
$a gynekologické chirurgické výkony $x ekonomika $7 D013509
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a hysterektomie $x ekonomika $7 D007044
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $x ekonomika $7 D010535
650    _2
$a klasifikační systém DRG $7 D003953
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Koliba, Peter $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000322040145 $7 mzk2004265332
700    1_
$a Kabele, Pavel $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000272953954
700    1_
$a Dubová, Oľga $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000900067185550X
700    1_
$a Hodyc, Daniel $u Advance Hospital Analytics, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Škodová, Magdalena Kolínková $u Advance Hospital Analytics, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zikán, Michal $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152668895 $7 xx0096708
700    1_
$a Sládková, Petra $u Physiotherapy and Medical Rehabilitation Department, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000267268154 $7 xx0138250
700    1_
$a Tichá, Marie $u Physiotherapy and Medical Rehabilitation Department, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000900033734355X
700    1_
$a Brtnický, Tomáš $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000262041903
773    0_
$w MED00006122 $t Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $x 1365-2753 $g Roč. 31, č. 3 (2025), s. e14196
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39420795 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20250708 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250731092814 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2366873 $s 1253438
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2025 $b 31 $c 3 $d e14196 $e 20241018 $i 1365-2753 $m Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $n J Eval Clin Pract $x MED00006122
GRA    __
$a NU21-03-00014 $p Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
GRA    __
$a 24-IGS02-36 $p Internal Project of Bulovka University Hospital
GRA    __
$a FNBul $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization
GRA    __
$a 00064211 $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20250708

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...