-
Something wrong with this record ?
How can we reduce healthcare costs by using Enhanced Recovery After Surgery more effectively in different groups of gynaecological patients? A single-centre experience
M. Polková, P. Koliba, P. Kabele, O. Dubová, D. Hodyc, MK. Škodová, M. Zikán, P. Sládková, M. Tichá, T. Brtnický
Language English
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
NU21-03-00014
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
24-IGS02-36
Internal Project of Bulovka University Hospital
FNBul
Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization
00064211
Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization
PubMed
39420795
DOI
10.1111/jep.14196
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Length of Stay statistics & numerical data economics MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Gynecologic Surgical Procedures * economics MeSH
- Hysterectomy economics MeSH
- Diagnosis-Related Groups MeSH
- Laparoscopy economics MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Health Care Costs * statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Enhanced Recovery After Surgery * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme implementation on treatment costs at a university-type centre, using the DRG scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' data in a group of 604 individuals enroled in the study. We evaluated three groups of patients according to the ERAS clinical protocol (CP): (1) CP oncogynaecology, (2) CP simple hysterectomy, (3) CP laparoscopy. The study aimed to evaluate the impact on the length of stay (LOS), savings in bed-days, and the reduction in direct treatment costs. Three parameters-antibiotic consumption, blood derivative consumption and laboratory test costs-were chosen to compare direct treatment costs. The statistical significance of the difference in the observed parameters was tested by a two-sample unpaired t test with unequal variances at the 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: We analysed data from 604 patients. In all three groups, the length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced. The most significant reduction was observed in the CP oncogynaecology group, where the LOS was reduced from 11.1 days to 6.8 days (2022) and 7.6 days (2023) compared to 2019 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a notable reduction in inpatient bed-days, which resulted in the capacity being made available to admit additional patients. A statistically significant reduction in direct costs was observed in the group of CP hysterectomy (antibiotic use) and in the CP laparoscopy (laboratory test costs). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ERAS principles resulted in a number of significant positive economic impacts-reduction in the LOS and a corresponding increase in bed capacity for new patients. Additionally, direct treatment costs, including those related to antibiotic use or laboratory testing were reduced. The Czech Republic's acute healthcare system, like the majority of European healthcare systems, is financed by the DRG system. This flat-rate payment per patient encourages hospital management to seek cost-reduction strategies. The results of our study indicate that fast-track protocols represent a potential viable approach to reducing the cost of treatment while simultaneously meeting the recommendations of evidence-based medicine.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc25016313
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250731092820.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 250708s2025 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/jep.14196 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39420795
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a x
- 100 1_
- $a Polková, Markéta $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000945811994
- 245 10
- $a How can we reduce healthcare costs by using Enhanced Recovery After Surgery more effectively in different groups of gynaecological patients? A single-centre experience / $c M. Polková, P. Koliba, P. Kabele, O. Dubová, D. Hodyc, MK. Škodová, M. Zikán, P. Sládková, M. Tichá, T. Brtnický
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme implementation on treatment costs at a university-type centre, using the DRG scheme. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients' data in a group of 604 individuals enroled in the study. We evaluated three groups of patients according to the ERAS clinical protocol (CP): (1) CP oncogynaecology, (2) CP simple hysterectomy, (3) CP laparoscopy. The study aimed to evaluate the impact on the length of stay (LOS), savings in bed-days, and the reduction in direct treatment costs. Three parameters-antibiotic consumption, blood derivative consumption and laboratory test costs-were chosen to compare direct treatment costs. The statistical significance of the difference in the observed parameters was tested by a two-sample unpaired t test with unequal variances at the 0.05 significance level. RESULTS: We analysed data from 604 patients. In all three groups, the length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced. The most significant reduction was observed in the CP oncogynaecology group, where the LOS was reduced from 11.1 days to 6.8 days (2022) and 7.6 days (2023) compared to 2019 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a notable reduction in inpatient bed-days, which resulted in the capacity being made available to admit additional patients. A statistically significant reduction in direct costs was observed in the group of CP hysterectomy (antibiotic use) and in the CP laparoscopy (laboratory test costs). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the ERAS principles resulted in a number of significant positive economic impacts-reduction in the LOS and a corresponding increase in bed capacity for new patients. Additionally, direct treatment costs, including those related to antibiotic use or laboratory testing were reduced. The Czech Republic's acute healthcare system, like the majority of European healthcare systems, is financed by the DRG system. This flat-rate payment per patient encourages hospital management to seek cost-reduction strategies. The results of our study indicate that fast-track protocols represent a potential viable approach to reducing the cost of treatment while simultaneously meeting the recommendations of evidence-based medicine.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $x statistika a číselné údaje $x ekonomika $7 D007902
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a urychlená pooperační rehabilitace $7 D000080482
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 12
- $a náklady na zdravotní péči $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D017048
- 650 12
- $a gynekologické chirurgické výkony $x ekonomika $7 D013509
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a hysterektomie $x ekonomika $7 D007044
- 650 _2
- $a laparoskopie $x ekonomika $7 D010535
- 650 _2
- $a klasifikační systém DRG $7 D003953
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Koliba, Peter $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000322040145 $7 mzk2004265332
- 700 1_
- $a Kabele, Pavel $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0009000272953954
- 700 1_
- $a Dubová, Oľga $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000900067185550X
- 700 1_
- $a Hodyc, Daniel $u Advance Hospital Analytics, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Škodová, Magdalena Kolínková $u Advance Hospital Analytics, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zikán, Michal $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000152668895 $7 xx0096708
- 700 1_
- $a Sládková, Petra $u Physiotherapy and Medical Rehabilitation Department, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000267268154 $7 xx0138250
- 700 1_
- $a Tichá, Marie $u Physiotherapy and Medical Rehabilitation Department, Bulovka University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000900033734355X
- 700 1_
- $a Brtnický, Tomáš $u Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1st Faculty of Medicine and Bulovka University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000262041903
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006122 $t Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $x 1365-2753 $g Roč. 31, č. 3 (2025), s. e14196
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39420795 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20250708 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250731092814 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2366873 $s 1253438
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2025 $b 31 $c 3 $d e14196 $e 20241018 $i 1365-2753 $m Journal of evaluation in clinical practice $n J Eval Clin Pract $x MED00006122
- GRA __
- $a NU21-03-00014 $p Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
- GRA __
- $a 24-IGS02-36 $p Internal Project of Bulovka University Hospital
- GRA __
- $a FNBul $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization
- GRA __
- $a 00064211 $p Ministry of Health, Czech Republic - Conceptual Development of Research Organization
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20250708