Two populations of muscarinic binding sites in the chick heart distinguished by affinities for ligands and selective inactivation
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
7889311
PubMed Central
PMC1510540
DOI
10.1111/j.1476-5381.1994.tb17170.x
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Alcuronium pharmacokinetics MeSH
- Muscarinic Antagonists * MeSH
- Choline analogs & derivatives MeSH
- Cholinergic Agents MeSH
- Diamines pharmacokinetics MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Chickens MeSH
- Ligands MeSH
- RNA, Messenger metabolism MeSH
- Myocardium metabolism MeSH
- N-Methylscopolamine MeSH
- Parasympatholytics pharmacology MeSH
- Pirenzepine analogs & derivatives pharmacokinetics MeSH
- Rats, Wistar MeSH
- Radioligand Assay MeSH
- Receptors, Muscarinic metabolism MeSH
- Scopolamine Derivatives pharmacokinetics MeSH
- In Vitro Techniques MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Alcuronium MeSH
- Muscarinic Antagonists * MeSH
- benzilylcholine mustard MeSH Browser
- Choline MeSH
- Cholinergic Agents MeSH
- Diamines MeSH
- Ligands MeSH
- RNA, Messenger MeSH
- methoctramine MeSH Browser
- N-Methylscopolamine MeSH
- otenzepad MeSH Browser
- Parasympatholytics MeSH
- Pirenzepine MeSH
- Receptors, Muscarinic MeSH
- Scopolamine Derivatives MeSH
1. By measuring the binding of N-[3H-methyl]-scopolamine ([3H]-NMS) and of unlabelled subtype-specific muscarinic antagonists, two populations of muscarinic binding sites can be distinguished in the membranes of cardiac ventricles taken from 1-day-old chicks. One of them, corresponding to approximately 80% of [3H]-NMS binding sites, has higher affinities for AF-DX116 (pKi = 6.42) and methoctramine (pKi = 7.33); the rate of [3H]NMS dissociation from these sites is fast. The other population, corresponding to approximately 20% of [3H]-NMS binding sites, has lower affinities for AF-DX116 (pKi = 5.00) and methoctramine (pKi = 6.19); the rate of [3H]-NMS dissociation from these sites is slow. Both populations have high affinities for pirenzepine, but the affinity of the former (major) population is lower (pKi = 7.99) than that of the latter (minor) population (pKi = 10.14). 2. Since it has been shown earlier that two mRNAs for muscarinic receptors are expressed in the chick heart, one of them close to the genetically defined m2 and the other to the m4 subtype, we propose that the major population of binding sites with high affinities for AF-DX116 and methoctramine and the lower affinity for pirenzepine represents the M2-like receptors, while the minor population represents the M4-like receptors. 3. It proved possible to obtain isolated samples of either population by selectively protecting the M2-like sites with AF-DX116 and the M4-like sites with pirenzepine, and by inactivating the unprotected sites with benzilylcholine mustard. The properties of the isolated populations corresponded to those derived from the analysis of [3H]-NMS binding to the original mixed population.4 Alcuronium exerted positive allosteric action on the binding of [3H]-NMS both to the M2-like and the M4-like population and severely slowed down [3H]-NMS dissociation from them; its affinity for the M2-like sites was 3-10 times higher.
See more in PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1985 May;27(5):525-31 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1983 May;23(3):551-7 PubMed
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986 Jan;236(1):219-23 PubMed
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986 Mar;236(3):602-9 PubMed
Eur J Pharmacol. 1987 Jul 23;139(3):359-60 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1988 Feb;33(2):187-94 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 1988 Feb;93(2):357-66 PubMed
Pharmacol Ther. 1988;37(3):357-423 PubMed
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988 Nov;247(2):596-602 PubMed
J Auton Pharmacol. 1988 Sep;8(3):259-66 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1989 Apr;35(4):469-76 PubMed
Trends Neurosci. 1989 Apr;12(4):148-51 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1989 May;35(5):553-8 PubMed
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1989 Sep;340(3):279-84 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 1990 Feb 15;265(5):2828-34 PubMed
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1990;30:633-73 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1990 Aug;38(2):267-73 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1990 Nov;38(5):674-80 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1990 Dec;38(6):805-15 PubMed
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991 Feb;256(2):468-79 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 1991 Jan;102(1):246-50 PubMed
Biochem Pharmacol. 1991 Jul 5;42(2):199-205 PubMed
J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 15;266(26):17382-7 PubMed
Biochem Pharmacol. 1991 Oct 24;42(10):1927-32 PubMed
Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Jun;58(3):319-79 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1994 Apr;45(4):709-17 PubMed
Eur J Pharmacol. 1994 Mar 3;253(3):275-81 PubMed
Mol Pharmacol. 1966 Jul;2(4):284-97 PubMed
Biochem Pharmacol. 1973 Dec 1;22(23):3099-108 PubMed
Br J Pharmacol. 1976 Nov;58(3):323-31 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1977 Dec;83(2):346-56 PubMed
Anal Biochem. 1980 Sep 1;107(1):220-39 PubMed
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1985 Apr;329(2):176-81 PubMed