The aim of the study was to find out whether the changes in nutritional status induced by different litter size during early postnatal development can influence quantitative and qualitative protein remodeling and contractile performance of the myocardium. Male Wistar rats born at the same day were pooled together at 2 days postbirth and assigned by random selection to dams in groups of 4, 8 or 16 rats/litter. The animals were investigated at the age of 4 and 16 weeks. The results revealed that the early postnatal nutritional modification altered weight parameters: whereas lower heart weight persisted in slow-growing rats until 16 weeks, higher body weight of fast-growing rats returned to the control level at the age of 16 weeks. Altered nutritional status influenced also protein remodeling of the myocardium: the concentration of all noncollagenous proteins (fractions of metabolic and contractile proteins) significantly increased in slow-growing rats, on the other hand, the concentration of collagenous proteins (pepsin-soluble and -insoluble fractions) was higher in fast-growing animals. The changes were, however, only transitional: three months after the end of the weaning period most protein changes returned to the control level. However, higher concentration of total blood lipids and triglycerides in fast-growing rats persisted until adulthood. Nutritional changes had, however, only minor effect on ventricular performance. No differences among groups were observed in basal values of the left ventricular pressure, while the maximum pressure attained after an acute ventricular loading and the contractile reserve were significantly decreased in slow-growing 4 week old rats. The functional consequence of altered nutritional status during weaning was only transitional, in agreement with the transient character of most structural and biochemical markers of myocardial remodeling.

Institute of Physiology Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mech Ageing Dev. 1984 Jun;25(3):307-21 PubMed

Circ Res. 1978 Feb;42(2):212-8 PubMed

Physiol Rev. 1986 Jul;66(3):710-71 PubMed

Pflugers Arch. 1992 May;421(1):26-31 PubMed

Am J Physiol. 1985 Oct;249(4 Pt 2):H763-9 PubMed

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(8):1591-608 PubMed

Mol Cell Biochem. 1995 Jun 7-21;147(1-2):43-9 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 May;7(5):1140-9 PubMed

Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1993;3(2):137-54 PubMed

Growth Dev Aging. 1990 Fall;54(3):125-9 PubMed

Anat Rec. 1990 Feb;226(2):207-12 PubMed

J Nutr. 1966 Jul;89(3):300-6 PubMed

Physiol Res. 1995;44(1):53-60 PubMed

Mol Cell Biochem. 1993 Dec 22;129(2):121-31 PubMed

Mol Cell Biochem. 1996 Oct-Nov;163-164:137-43 PubMed

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(8):1737-46 PubMed

Int J Dev Biol. 1992 Jun;36(2):339-42 PubMed

Circulation. 1991 Jan;83(1):13-25 PubMed

Am J Physiol. 1984 Dec;247(6 Pt 2):H967-72 PubMed

Mol Cell Biochem. 1996 Oct-Nov;163-164:67-76 PubMed

Physiol Rev. 1992 Apr;72(2):507-62 PubMed

Mol Cell Biochem. 1993 Dec 22;129(2):101-20 PubMed

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1993 Jun;25(6):733-40 PubMed

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1977 Aug;9(8):651-60 PubMed

Mol Cell Biochem. 1996 Jun 7;159(1):55-63 PubMed

Biochemistry. 1991 Jan 22;30(3):707-12 PubMed

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1996 Oct;28(10):2203-15 PubMed

Am J Physiol. 1984 Mar;246(3 Pt 2):H332-8 PubMed

Cardiovasc Res. 1992 Sep;26(9):845-50 PubMed