Srovnání výsledků lécby miniinvazivní a otevrené osteosyntézy pri poranĕní proximálního radia v dĕtském vĕku
[Comparison of the results of minimally invasive and open osteosynthesis in treatment of injuries of the proximal radius in children]
Language Czech Country Czech Republic Media print
Document type Comparative Study, English Abstract, Journal Article
PubMed
10746059
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Radius Fractures surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures * methods MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Internal * methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- English Abstract MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
The authors present their experience with treatment of injuries of the proximal radius in children. During the period between 1994 and 1998 they treated on account of this injury a total of 59 patients. Ten times they used the open method, 15 times percutaneous fixation and 34 times a conservative approach. They compare the therapeutic results of both surgical methods and demonstrate better results when the miniinvasive approach--percutaneous fixation--is used. The authors recommend this procedure in dislocated injuries type II and III and emphasize the necessity of high standard technical equipment and experience of the working team.
