Combined biodifferentiating and antiangiogenic oral metronomic therapy is feasible and effective in relapsed solid tumors in children: single-center pilot study
Language English Country Switzerland Media print-electronic
Document type Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
16874014
DOI
10.1159/000093474
PII: 93474
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Administration, Oral MeSH
- Celecoxib MeSH
- Dacarbazine administration & dosage analogs & derivatives MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Etoposide administration & dosage MeSH
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors administration & dosage MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy prevention & control MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Neoplasms drug therapy MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage MeSH
- Pyrazoles administration & dosage MeSH
- Drug Administration Schedule MeSH
- Feasibility Studies MeSH
- Sulfonamides administration & dosage MeSH
- Temozolomide MeSH
- Tretinoin administration & dosage MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Controlled Clinical Trial MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Celecoxib MeSH
- Dacarbazine MeSH
- Etoposide MeSH
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors MeSH
- Pyrazoles MeSH
- Sulfonamides MeSH
- Temozolomide MeSH
- Tretinoin MeSH
BACKGROUND: To outline an outpatient-based treatment for children with relapsed solid tumors, who already have been extensively pretreated, we defined a 4-drug protocol named COMBAT (combined oral maintenance biodifferentiating and antiangiogenic therapy). Using this protocol, we performed a pilot study to determine its feasibility in children with relapsed and/or high-risk pediatric solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 22 children received the COMBAT protocol. Treatment consisted of daily celecoxib administration along with daily 13-cisretinoic acid (2 weeks on / 2 weeks off) and cycles of metronomic temozolomide (90 mg/m2 for 42 days) and low-dose etoposide (21 days). The treatment was scheduled for a period of 1 year. RESULTS: 9 of the 14 patients assessable for response demonstrated evidence of treatment benefit manifested as prolonged disease stabilization or response. The protocol medication was well tolerated with very good compliance. Only minimal side effects where observed which responded to dose modification or local therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The COMBAT regimen is well tolerated by patients with intensive prior therapy including myeloablative regimens. Favorable responses observed in this cohort of patients support the further exploration of this and/or similar strategies in the treatment of pediatric solid tumors.
References provided by Crossref.org
Future paradigms for precision oncology
Lessons from the Fourth Metronomic and Anti-angiogenic Therapy Meeting, 24-25 June 2014, Milan