Impact of diffusion-weighted MRI-measured initial cerebral infarction volume on clinical outcome in acute stroke patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion treated by thrombolysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- cévní mozková příhoda komplikace MeSH
- difuzní magnetická rezonance * MeSH
- infarkt arteria cerebri media komplikace diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- trombolytická terapie * MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may help identify acute stroke patients with a higher potential benefit from thrombolytic therapy. The aim of our study was to assess the correlation between initial cerebral infarct (CI) volume (quantified on diffusion-weighted MRI) and the resulting clinical outcome in acute stroke patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) (M(1-2) segment) occlusion detected on MRI angiography treated by intravenous/intraarterial thrombolysis. METHODS: Initial infarct volume (V(DWI-I) ) was retrospectively compared with neurological deficit evaluated using the NIH stroke scale on admission and 24 h later, and with the 90-day clinical outcome assessed using the modified Rankin scale in a series of 25 consecutive CI patients. The relationship between infarct volume and neurological deficit severity was assessed and, following the establishment of the maximum V(DWI-I) still associated with a good clinical outcome, the patients were divided into two groups (V(DWI-I) < or =70 ml and >70 ml). RESULTS: V(DWI-I) ranged from 0.7 to 321 ml. The 24-h clinical outcome improved significantly (P=0.0001) in 87% of patients with a V(DWI-I) < or =70 ml (group 1) and deteriorated significantly (P=0.0018) in all patients with a V(DWI-I) >70 ml (group 2). The 90-day mortality was 0% in group 1 and 71.5% in group 2. The 90-day clinical outcome was significantly better in group 1 than in group 2 (P=0.026). CONCLUSION: Clinical outcome could be predicted from initial infarct volume quantified by MRI-DWI in acute CI patients with MCA occlusion treated by intravenous/intraarterial thrombolysis. Patients with a V(DWI-I) < or =70 ml had a significantly better outcome.
Stroke Center Department of Neurology University Hospital IP Pavlova 6 775 20 Olomouc Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Jun-Jul;19(6):1061-6 PubMed
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(4):311-37 PubMed
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2230-7 PubMed
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):223-8 PubMed
Radiology. 2001 Oct;221(1):43-50 PubMed
Stroke. 2004 Nov;35(11 Suppl 1):2671-4 PubMed
Neurology. 1999 Jun 10;52(9):1784-92 PubMed
Ann Neurol. 2002 Jan;51(1):28-37 PubMed
Stroke. 2001 May;32(5):1147-53 PubMed
Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):353-60 PubMed
Neurology. 1992 Sep;42(9):1717-23 PubMed
Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):575-83 PubMed
Neuroradiology. 2001 Aug;43(8):628-32 PubMed
Neurology. 1998 Aug;51(2):418-26 PubMed
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37 PubMed
Neurology. 1999 Apr 12;52(6):1125-32 PubMed
Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):932-7 PubMed
Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1318-28 PubMed
Ann Neurol. 2000 May;47(5):559-70 PubMed
Stroke. 1999 Aug;30(8):1591-7 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 30;337(18):1309-10; discussion 1313 PubMed
J Neurol Sci. 2004 Oct 15;225(1-2):3-9 PubMed
Radiology. 1992 Jan;182(1):41-7 PubMed
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1993 May-Jun;14(3):721-9 PubMed
Radiology. 1999 Feb;210(2):519-27 PubMed
Ann Neurol. 2001 Apr;49(4):460-9 PubMed
Neuroradiology. 2000 Aug;42(8):602-7 PubMed
Stroke. 2002 Oct;33(10):2438-45 PubMed
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004 Jun-Jul;25(6):951-7 PubMed
Neurology. 2004 Jun 22;62(12):2187-92 PubMed
Stroke. 2002 Aug;33(8):2047-52 PubMed
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Aug;21(7):1184-9 PubMed
Stroke. 2000 Sep;31(9):2175-81 PubMed
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998 Jun;18(6):583-609 PubMed
Ann Neurol. 2000 Apr;47(4):462-9 PubMed
Stroke. 2003 Feb;34(2):458-63 PubMed
Is atrial fibrillation associated with poor outcome after thrombolysis?