Influence of fiber on glycemic index of enteral nutrition
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
17947605
DOI
10.1177/0148607107031006491
PII: 31/6/491
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- diabetes mellitus metabolismus terapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- enterální výživa * MeSH
- glykemický index MeSH
- hyperglykemie metabolismus prevence a kontrola MeSH
- hyperinzulinismus metabolismus prevence a kontrola MeSH
- inzulin krev MeSH
- klinické křížové studie MeSH
- krevní glukóza metabolismus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- plocha pod křivkou MeSH
- podvýživa terapie MeSH
- postprandiální období MeSH
- potrava speciální analýza MeSH
- potravní vláknina metabolismus farmakologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- inzulin MeSH
- krevní glukóza MeSH
- potravní vláknina MeSH
BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition is indicated in patients with malnutrition due to inadequate peroral intake. A number of these patients have diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of fiber-enriched enteral nutrition on postprandial glycemia and insulinemia. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers consumed the following solutions: A. 50 g of glucose, B. enteral formula containing 50 g of saccharides, and C. enteral formula containing 50 g of saccharides enriched with 2.3 g of fiber/100 mL. Postprandial glycemia and insulinemia were measured in time period after administration of specified nutrition. Time courses of glycemia and insulinemia were used for calculation of areas under the curve (AUC). The glycemic (GlyI) and insulinemic (InsI) indices of the nutrition were subsequently derived from AUC. Every measurement was performed 3 times for given type of nutrition. RESULTS: Results are presented as median and interquartile range. GlyI of enteral nutrition was 85.76 (82.71-87.82), GlyI of enteral nutrition with fiber was 84.61 (80.31-94.39). InsI of enteral nutrition was 114.15 (106.55-137.71); InsI of enteral nutrition with fiber was 104.10 (96.71-127.96). The GlyI and InsI results did not differ significantly. Addition of fiber into enteral nutrition did not influence postprandial glycemia in comparison with common enteral nutrition. CONCLUSIONS: Added fiber in polymerous enteral nutrition does not influence postprandial glycemia compared with polymerous enteral nutrition without fiber.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org