Intergeneric hybrids of fescues (Festuca spp.) and ryegrasses (Lolium spp.) are unique for the ability of their chromosomes to pair essentially freely in meiotic metaphase I (MI). At the same time, their chromosomes can be readily recognized by genomic in-situ hybridization (GISH). Past genome-wide observations suggested that this homoeologous pairing was not completely random. In this study we extend the analysis to all seven individual chromosomes of F. pratensis introgressed into autotetraploid L. multiflorum and show that for any F. pratensis chromosome the choice of an MI pairing partner depends on the identity of the remaining chromosomes present in the quadruplet. In monosomic introgressions, the choice of a homologous or homoeologous partner was completely random; in disomics there was a slight preference for homologous pairing. Pairing preference was similar for each chromosome, suggesting that pairing affinity of all chromosomes is essentially the same and no structural rearrangements differentiate the two genera. Homoeologous crossover rates for individual chromosomes were similar and they were consistently lower than expected on the basis of the MI pairing. High homoeologous MI pairing in these hybrids may be due to a very permissive system of chromosome pairing control that overlooks differences between the parental chromosomes. Given the ease of genome discrimination by GISH in the Lolium-Festuca hybrids, the differences in repetitive DNA sequences must be substantial. On the other hand, it appears just as likely that while the DNA repeats diverged markedly during evolution, the sequences involved in chromosome pairing have been conserved enough to facilitate regular pairing partner recognition and crossing-over.

Laboratory of Molecular Cytogenetics and Cytometry Institute of Experimental Botany Sokolovská 6 77200 Olomouc Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1155-60 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Oct;82(5):577-86 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1985 Dec;71(2):185-92 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 May;31(2):517-41 PubMed

Genome. 1990 Dec;33(6):759-78 PubMed

Genome. 1997 Jun;40(3):406-10 PubMed

Nucleic Acids Res. 1979 Dec 11;7(7):1869-85 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2;94(18):9757-62 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Jul;91(2):282-8 PubMed

Genomics. 1992 Aug;13(4):1334-6 PubMed

Chromosome Res. 2002;10(5):349-57 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1980 May;58(3-4):137-43 PubMed

Genome. 1994 Feb;37(1):105-11 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1994 Sep;88(8):909-13 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Feb;85(6-7):673-80 PubMed

Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):307-14 PubMed

Genome. 1994 Apr;37(2):181-9 PubMed

Genetics. 1986 Mar;112(3):441-57 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 2006 Aug;113(4):731-42 PubMed

Genome Dominance in Allium Hybrids (A. cepa × A. roylei)

Direct evidence for crossover and chromatid interference in meiosis of two plant hybrids (Lolium multiflorum×Festuca pratensis and Allium cepa×A. roylei)

Chromosome Pairing in Polyploid Grasses

Exploiting repetitive sequences and BAC clones in Festuca pratensis karyotyping

Flow sorting and sequencing meadow fescue chromosome 4F

Development and mapping of DArT markers within the Festuca - Lolium complex