High versus standard-volume haemofiltration in hyperdynamic porcine peritonitis: effects beyond haemodynamics?
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- energetický metabolismus MeSH
- hemodynamika fyziologie MeSH
- hemofiltrace metody MeSH
- mikrocirkulace fyziologie MeSH
- náhodné rozdělení MeSH
- oxidační stres fyziologie MeSH
- peritonitida komplikace patofyziologie MeSH
- prasata MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- septický šok etiologie terapie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The role of haemofiltration as an adjunctive treatment of sepsis remains a contentious issue. To address the role of dose and to explore the biological effects of haemofiltration we compared the effects of standard and high-volume haemofiltration (HVHF) in a peritonitis-induced model of porcine septic shock. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized, controlled experimental study. SUBJECTS: Twenty-one anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. INTERVENTIONS: After 12 h of hyperdynamic peritonitis, animals were randomized to receive either supportive treatment (Control, n = 7) or standard haemofiltration (HF 35 ml/kg per h, n = 7) or HVHF (100 ml/kg per hour, n = 7). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Systemic and hepatosplanchnic haemodynamics, oxygen exchange, energy metabolism (lactate/pyruvate, ketone body ratios), ileal and renal cortex microcirculation and systemic inflammation (TNF-alpha, IL-6), nitrosative/oxidative stress (TBARS, nitrates, GSH/GSSG) and endothelial/coagulation dysfunction (von Willebrand factor, asymmetric dimethylarginine, platelet count) were assessed before, 12, 18, and 22 h of peritonitis. Although fewer haemofiltration-treated animals required noradrenaline support (86, 43 and 29% animals in the control, HF and HVHF groups, respectively), neither of haemofiltration doses reversed hyperdynamic circulation, lung dysfunction and ameliorated alterations in gut and kidney microvascular perfusion. Both HF and HVHF failed to attenuate sepsis-induced alterations in surrogate markers of cellular energetics, nitrosative/oxidative stress, endothelial injury or systemic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: In this porcine model of septic shock early HVHF proved superior in preventing the development of septic hypotension. However, neither of haemofiltration doses was capable of reversing the progressive disturbances in microvascular, metabolic, endothelial and lung function, at least within the timeframe of the study and severity of the model.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Chest. 2004 Jan;125(1):243-8 PubMed
Crit Care. 2007;11(5):R101 PubMed
Artif Organs. 2003 Sep;27(9):792-801 PubMed
Am J Kidney Dis. 1997 Nov;30(5 Suppl 4):S38-43 PubMed
J Leukoc Biol. 2008 Mar;83(3):536-45 PubMed
Shock. 2007 Jan;27(1):61-8 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 31;346(5):305-10 PubMed
Am J Physiol. 1988 Jan;254(1 Pt 2):H20-7 PubMed
J Crit Care. 2007 Mar;22(1):1-12 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7 Suppl):S21-7 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 23;345(8):588-95 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2002 May;30(5 Suppl):S302-12 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Aug;25(8):814-21 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Sep;25(9):890-2 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 3;359(1):7-20 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2002 Apr;30(4):894-9 PubMed
Int J Artif Organs. 2006 Jul;29(7):649-59 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jun;27(6):978-86 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1423-30 PubMed
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Dec;35(6):911-9 PubMed
Anesthesiology. 2003 Apr;98(4):928-34 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Apr;27(4):757-66 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;31(1):237-45 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 1999 Sep;27(9):1848-55 PubMed
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):R294-302 PubMed
Lancet. 2000 Jul 1;356(9223):26-30 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):896-7 PubMed
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):88-98, 98.e1-2 PubMed
Anesthesiology. 2001 Aug;95(2):428-36 PubMed
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Mar;19(3):623-30 PubMed
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1429-36 PubMed
FEBS Lett. 2000 Mar 24;470(2):151-5 PubMed
Int J Artif Organs. 2005 May;28(5):450-8 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 1996 Dec;22(12):1360-7 PubMed
ASAIO J. 2004 Jan-Feb;50(1):102-9 PubMed
Anesthesiology. 2006 Jun;104(6):1216-22 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 1999 Jul;25(7):733-43 PubMed
Int J Artif Organs. 2007 Oct;30(10):855-7 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2000 Nov;28(11):3581-7 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11 Suppl):S562-70 PubMed
Kidney Int. 2002 Nov;62(5):1806-18 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug;34(8):2244-6 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan;30(1):100-6 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):80-6 PubMed
Kidney Int. 2006 Oct;70(7):1312-7 PubMed
Contrib Nephrol. 2007;156:387-95 PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(4):235-40 PubMed
Ren Fail. 2006;28(2):107-18 PubMed
Shock. 2004 May;21(5):458-65 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2005 May;33(5):1057-63 PubMed
Crit Care Clin. 2006 Jan;22(1):131-49, vii-viii PubMed
Intensive Care Med. 2006 May;32(5):713-22 PubMed
Searching for mechanisms that matter in early septic acute kidney injury: an experimental study