Correlation between changes in ultrasound measurements and clinical curative effect of tension-free vaginal tape-SECUR* procedure
International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction | Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct
Source
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Prosthesis Implantation methods MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Statistics, Nonparametric MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress surgery MeSH
- Suburethral Slings * MeSH
- Ultrasonography MeSH
- Urethra diagnostic imaging surgery MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The hypotheses of this study were that the TVT-SECUR procedure restricts urethral mobility, which leads to a greater likelihood of curative effect, and that the restriction might change over time. METHODS: Analyses of the position of the urethra and the tape of 85 patients who underwent the TVT-S procedure were performed using perineal ultrasonography. The efficacy of the TVT-S procedure was evaluated by cough test and by the questionnaire ICIQ-UI SF. RESULTS: Objectively, 53/85 (62%) of patients had a negative cough test, and in 32/85 (38%) of patients leakage of urine persisted. The TVT-S procedure restricts urethral mobility, and a higher degree of obstruction is associated with a higher likelihood of cure. The restriction weakens within the first 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The objective cure rate of TVT-S procedure is low irrespective of placement technique. This may be due to insufficient restriction of urethral mobility.
See more in PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Nov;17(6):672-3 PubMed
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;28(2):214-20 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jul;18(7):779-86 PubMed
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1995 Mar;29(1):75-82 PubMed
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):288-308 PubMed
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;23(3):302-4 PubMed
Eur Urol. 2003 Dec;44(6):724-30 PubMed
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;26(2):175-9 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Oct;19(10):1423-7 PubMed
Prog Urol. 2001 Dec;11(6):1306-13 PubMed
Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):258-60 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Jan;18(1):19-22 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Nov;19(11):1513-7 PubMed
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007 Feb;18(2):183-7 PubMed
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;23(3):267-71 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1043-7 PubMed
J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1629 PubMed
Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261-74 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1125-31 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Sep;17(5):466-71 PubMed
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;27(6):687-92 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1049-54 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004 Jul-Aug;15(4):227-32 PubMed
What is the optimal length for single-incision tape?
Variation of distances from mid-urethra to the obturator foramen: an MRI study
TVT-S for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: prospective trial, 1-year follow-up