Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
27037563
DOI
10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x
PII: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Ajust™, Single incision midurethral sling, Stress urinary incontinence, Surgical treatment, TVT-O,
- MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kvalita života MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- pooperační bolest MeSH
- předoperační péče MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- stresová inkontinence moči chirurgie MeSH
- suburetrální pásky * MeSH
- urologické chirurgické výkony metody MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a randomized two-arm study with a 1-year follow-up. METHODS: This single-centre randomized trial compared the objective and subjective cure rates of TVT-O and Ajust using objective criteria (cough test) and subjective criteria (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire short form, ICIQ-UI SF). The objective cure rate was defined as the number of patients with a negative cough stress test. Subjective cure was defined as no stress leakage of urine after surgery based on the ICIQ-UI SF. The primary outcome was to establish differences in objective and subjective cure rates between the TVT-O and Ajust groups. We also compared postoperative pain profiles using a visual analogue scale (VAS), improvement in quality of life using the ICIQ- UI SF and the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire, and overall satisfaction with the surgical procedure using a VAS and a five-item Likert scale. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years, signed informed consent, and urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. Following a power calculation, 50 patients were enrolled into each group (Ajust and TVT-O). RESULTS: The mean follow-up after surgery was 445 days (SD 157.6 days) in the TVT-O group and 451.8 days (SD 127.6 days) in the Ajust group (p = 76.6 %). At 1 year, 47 patients were evaluated in the TVT-O group and 49 in the Ajust group. No differences in subjective cure rates or objective cure rates were observed. In the Ajust and TVT-O groups, the rates for no subjective stress leakage were 89.8 % and 91.5 %, respectively (p = 1.0, OR 1.22, 95 % CI 0.24 - 6.58), and the rates for a negative stress test were 89.8 % and 87.2 %, respectively (p = 0.76, OR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.17 - 3.32). In the Ajust group two patients reported de novo pain during sexual intercourse. CONCLUSIONS: After a 1-year-follow-up, no significant differences were found with regard to subjective and objective outcomes between the single-incision tape Ajust and TVT-O.
1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
Faculty of Sciences Charles University Prague Prague Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Urology. 2013 Sep;82(3):552-9 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Oct;23(10):1403-12 PubMed
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Jan;81(1):72-7 PubMed
Eur Urol. 2003 Dec;44(6):724-30 PubMed
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(1):46-52 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26 PubMed
Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23(4):322-30 PubMed
Urology. 1999 Jan;53(1):71-6 PubMed
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):27-34 PubMed
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul;175(1):10-7 PubMed
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):321-7 PubMed
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jun;168(2):231-5 PubMed
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1995 Mar;29(1):75-82 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jul;21(7):779-85 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jun;20(6):681-8 PubMed
Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):843-51 PubMed
BJU Int. 2012 Mar;109(6):880-6 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2066-76 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Dec;24(12):2119-23 PubMed
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Oct;170(2):563-6 PubMed
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Nov;165(1):115-21 PubMed
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Dec;111(3):233-6 PubMed
Eur Urol. 2007 Sep;52(3):663-78 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Feb;22(2):241-6 PubMed
Pain. 1983 Sep;17(1):45-56 PubMed
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Feb;26(2):303-5 PubMed
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):402-27 PubMed
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):288-308 PubMed
Prog Urol. 2001 Dec;11(6):1306-13 PubMed
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;104(5 Pt 1):989-94 PubMed
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;101(5 Pt 1):929-32 PubMed
What is the optimal length for single-incision tape?