Irresistible bouquet of death--how are burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorus) attracted by carcasses
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- brouci fyziologie MeSH
- chování zvířat MeSH
- chromatografie plynová MeSH
- ekosystém MeSH
- hmotnostní spektrometrie MeSH
- kladení vajíček MeSH
- krmivo pro zvířata * MeSH
- larva fyziologie MeSH
- myši MeSH
- odoranty MeSH
- posmrtné změny MeSH
- smrt MeSH
- sulfidy analýza MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- myši MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- dimethyl sulfide MeSH Prohlížeč
- sulfidy MeSH
Chemical composition of volatiles emitted from fresh mouse carcasses (laboratory mice, Mus musculus) was studied using solid sample injection technique (solid-phase micro-extraction), two-dimensional gas chromatography with time of flight mass spectrometric detection and gas chromatography with electroantennographic detection. Electroantennography (EAG) and laboratory olfactometric behavioural observations were used to study the antennal sensitivity to identified infochemicals and their attractiveness for burying beetles Nicrophorus vespillo and Nicrophorus vespilloides (Silphidae: Nicrophorinae). Chemical analysis showed that immediately after death, emitted volatiles did not differ from those emitted by a living organism. However, in the course of time, sulphur-containing chemicals, specifically methanethiol, methyl thiolacetate, dimethyl sulphide, dimethyl disulphide and dimethyl trisulphide appear. EAG measurements revealed antennal sensitivity to these compounds. Behavioural tests in laboratory olfactometer showed that dimethyl sulphide, dimethyl disulphide and dimethyl trisulphide are highly attractive to both studied species. The data suggest that sulphur-containing chemicals are involved in mediating the fresh carcass attractiveness for N. vespillo and N. vespilloides.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
New Phytol. 2006;172(3):382-5 PubMed
New Phytol. 2006;172(3):452-68 PubMed
J Bacteriol. 1969 Jun;98(3):908-13 PubMed
J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jul;170(6):677-85 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 2008 Jan;34(1):94-8 PubMed
Annu Rev Entomol. 1998;43:595-618 PubMed
J Med Entomol. 2004 May;41(3):511-23 PubMed
J Chromatogr A. 2005 Aug 12;1083(1-2):161-72 PubMed
Nature. 2002 Dec 12;420(6916):625-6 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 1989 Apr;15(4):1391-8 PubMed
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Mar 20;122(3):321-7 PubMed
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Aug;7(4):434-40 PubMed
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1972;26:127-38 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 1989 Jun;15(6):1847-54 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 1993 Apr;19(4):735-50 PubMed
J Chem Ecol. 2001 Jul;27(7):1315-31 PubMed
J Med Entomol. 2005 Mar;42(2):193-203 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 Aug;38(2):332-4 PubMed
Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1972;132(1):95-106 PubMed
J Insect Physiol. 2003 Mar;49(3):271-80 PubMed
J Appl Bacteriol. 1981 Dec;51(3):529-34 PubMed
Army ant middens - Home and nursery of a diverse beetle fauna