Effect of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on reaction time, clinical features and cognitive functions in patients with Parkinson's disease
Jazyk angličtina Země Rakousko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- analýza rozptylu MeSH
- biofyzika metody MeSH
- elektrická stimulace MeSH
- kognitivní poruchy etiologie patologie MeSH
- krátkodobá paměť fyziologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mozková kůra patologie patofyziologie MeSH
- neuropsychologické testy MeSH
- Parkinsonova nemoc komplikace MeSH
- pozornost fyziologie MeSH
- psychomotorický výkon fyziologie MeSH
- reakční čas fyziologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- transkraniální magnetická stimulace metody MeSH
- výběrové chování fyziologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of one session of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the left dorsal premotor cortex (PMd) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on choice reaction time in a noise-compatibility task, and cognitive functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Clinical motor symptoms of PD were assessed as well. Ten patients with PD entered a randomized, placebo-controlled study with a crossover design. Each patient received 10 Hz stimulation over the left PMd and DLPFC (active stimulation sites) and the occipital cortex (OCC; a control stimulation site) in the OFF motor state, i.e. at least after 12 h of dopaminergic drugs withdrawal. Frameless stereotaxy was used to target the optimal position of the coil. For the evaluation of reaction time, we used a noise-compatibility paradigm. A short battery of neuropsychological tests was performed to evaluate executive functions, working memory, and psychomotor speed. Clinical assessment included a clinical motor evaluation using part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of rTMS applied over the left PMd and/or DLPFC in patients with PD in any of the measured parameters. In this study, we did not observe any effect of one session of high frequency rTMS applied over the left PMd and/or DLPFC on choice reaction time in a noise-compatibility task, cognitive functions, or motor features in patients with PD. rTMS applied over all three stimulated areas was well tolerated and safe in terms of the cognitive and motor effects.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;113(2):265-9 PubMed
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007 Mar;7(1):1-17 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 1;90(3):878-82 PubMed
Exp Brain Res. 2003 Jan;148(1):1-16 PubMed
Neurology. 2009 Jan 6;72(1):42-9 PubMed
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jan;118(1):131-9 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Feb;37(2):207-17 PubMed
Lancet. 1999 Jun 26;353(9171):2209 PubMed
Brain. 1998 Aug;121 ( Pt 8):1533-44 PubMed
J Comp Neurol. 1993 Dec 1;338(1):114-40 PubMed
Behav Brain Res. 1985 Dec;18(3):269-77 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(13):1781-7 PubMed
Neurology. 1994 May;44(5):892-8 PubMed
Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20 Suppl 1:S89-100 PubMed
Mov Disord. 2005 Sep;20(9):1178-84 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(3):357-70 PubMed
Brain. 1988 Apr;111 ( Pt 2):299-321 PubMed
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Jun;51(6):745-52 PubMed
Mov Disord. 2007 Jul 30;22(10):1518-1519 PubMed
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):436-47 PubMed
Brain. 2004 Dec;127(Pt 12):2732-46 PubMed
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;75(8):1171-4 PubMed
J Neurosci. 1997 May 1;17(9):3178-84 PubMed
Nature. 1993 Jun 17;363(6430):623-5 PubMed
Brain. 1996 Dec;119 ( Pt 6):2121-32 PubMed
BMC Psychiatry. 2002;2:1 PubMed
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004 Jun;29(6):1172-89 PubMed
Brain. 1997 Jun;120 ( Pt 6):963-76 PubMed
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9 PubMed
Mov Disord. 2006 Mar;21(3):325-31 PubMed
J Comp Neurol. 1993 Oct 8;336(2):211-28 PubMed
Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Jun 1;45(11):1440-6 PubMed
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2189-94 PubMed
Brain. 1998 Jan;121 ( Pt 1):167-77 PubMed
Mov Disord. 2009 Apr 15;24(5):672-6 PubMed
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Jun;16(6):827-34 PubMed
Brain. 1998 May;121 ( Pt 5):785-99 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):876-82 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):1071-83 PubMed
J ECT. 2001 Dec;17(4):259-63 PubMed
Mov Disord. 2009 Feb 15;24(3):357-63 PubMed
J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 1;21(15):RC157 PubMed
Brain. 1998 Nov;121 ( Pt 11):2135-43 PubMed
Neuroreport. 2005 Apr 25;16(6):615-9 PubMed
J Comp Neurol. 1987 Feb 8;256(2):211-28 PubMed
Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):342-5 PubMed
Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Jul;25(3):328-35 PubMed
Neuroreport. 2001 Sep 17;12(13):2915-8 PubMed
Neurology. 2002 Apr 23;58(8):1288-90 PubMed
J Neuroimaging. 1997 Jul;7(3):145-51 PubMed
Eur J Neurosci. 1999 Mar;11(3):1011-36 PubMed
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Aug;133(4):425-30 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 1991;29(12):1137-48 PubMed
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Apr;89(2):120-30 PubMed
Brain. 1988 Apr;111 ( Pt 2):323-45 PubMed
J Neurol Sci. 2000 Sep 15;178(2):91-4 PubMed
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Apr;77(4):2164-74 PubMed
J Neurosci. 1985 Mar;5(3):776-94 PubMed
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1556-73 PubMed
J Neurol Sci. 2005 Mar 15;229-230:157-61 PubMed
Neurosci Res. 2006 Feb;54(2):73-84 PubMed
Biol Psychiatry. 2006 May 15;59(10):898-907 PubMed
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006 Jun;64(2B):407-11 PubMed
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2003 Mar;9(3):419-28 PubMed
Neuropsychologia. 1999 Feb;37(2):219-24 PubMed
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Jun;9(3):339-42 PubMed
Neuroreport. 1999 Nov 26;10(17):3671-4 PubMed
Neurology. 2002 Sep 10;59(5):720-3 PubMed
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003 Jul;17(2):212-22 PubMed