BACKGROUND: The Moorehead-Ardelt II (MA-II) questionnaire is the most frequently applied instrument to assess quality of life (QoL) in bariatric surgery patients. Our aim was to validate the Czech, German, Italian, and Spanish version of the MA-II. METHODS: A total of 893 patients were enroled in a prospective cross-sectional European study. Two thirds of the patients(n = 591) were postsurgical cases. In addition to demographicand clinical data, QoL data was collected using the MA-II questionnaire, the EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), and the Short Form 36 Health Survery (SF-36). Statistical parameters for contingency (Cronbach's alpha), construct and criterion validity(Pearson's r), and responsiveness (standardised effect sizes) were calculated for each language version. RESULTS: In the different languages, Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.817 to 0.885 for the MA-II. These values were higher than those obtained for the SF-36 (0.418-0.607). The MA-II was well correlated to the EQ-5D (r = 0.662) and to 3 of the 8 health domains of the SF-36 (0.615, 0.548, and 0.569 for physical functioning,physical role, and general health, respectively). As expected, there was a negative correlation between the MA-II and the BMI (r = -0.404 for all patients), but no significant correlation with age was found.When comparing both the heaviest and the lightest third of the patients, mean responsiveness was higher for the MA-II (-1.138) than for the domains of the SF-36 (range -0.111 to -1.070) and the EQ-5D (-0.874). CONCLUSION: The Czech, German, Italian, and Spanish version of the MA-II questionnaire are valid instruments and should be preferred to generic questionnaires as they provide better responsiveness.

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine University of Witten Herdecke Germany

See more in PubMed

Troidl H, Kusche J, Vestweber KH, Eypasch E, Koeppen L, Bouillon B. Quality of life: an important endpoint both in surgical practice and research. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:523–528. PubMed

Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the impact of weight on quality of life-lite questionnaire (IWQOL-lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:157–171. PubMed

Nguyen N, Varela EJ, Nguyen T, Wilson SE. Quality of life assessment in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg. 2006;16:531–533. PubMed

Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinée S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, García-Caballero M, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JRT, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E. Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:879–897. PubMed

Moorehead MK, Ardelt-Gattinger E, Lechner H, Oria HE. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13:684–692. PubMed

Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) Obes Surg. 1998;8:487–499. PubMed

Wolf AM, Falcone AR, Kortner B, Kuhlmann HW. BAROS: an effective system to evaluate the results of patients after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2000;10:445–450. PubMed

Le Pen C, Lévy E, Loos F, Banzet MN, Basdevant A. 'Specific' scale compared with 'generic' scale: a double measurement of the quality of life in a French community sample of obese subjects. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:445–450. PubMed PMC

Weiner S, Sauerland S, Fein M, Blanco R, Pomhoff I, Weiner RA. The Bariatric Quality of Life (BQL) index: a measure of well-being in obesity surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:538–545. PubMed

Sauerland S, Weiner S, Dolezalova K, Angrisani L, Masdevall Noguera C, García-Caballero M, Rupprecht F, Immenroth M. Mapping utility scores from a disease-specific quality-of-life measure in bariatric surgery patients. Value Health. 2008 [epub ahead of print] PubMed

Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193–205. PubMed

Greiner W, Claes C, Busschbach JJ, Graf von der Schulenburg JM. Validating the EQ-5D with time trade off for the German population. Eur J Health Econ. 2005;6:124–130. PubMed

Rebollo P, Moris J, Ortega T, Valdes C, Ortega F. Estimating utility values for health status using the Spanish version of the SF-36. Validity of the SF-6D index vs. EQ-5D [Article in Spanish]. Med Clin (Barc) 2007;128:536–537. PubMed

Greiner W, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, Oppe S, Badia X, Busschbach J, Buxton M, Dolan P, Kind P, Krabbe P, Ohinmaa A, Parkin D, Roset M, Sintonen H, Tsuchiya A, de Charro F, A single European currency for EQ-5D health states Results from a six-country study. Eur J Health Econ. 2003;4:222–231. PubMed

Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bech P, Brazier J, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M, The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1159–1165. PubMed

Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42:851–859. PubMed

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. PubMed

Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459–468. PubMed

Duval K, Marceau P, Lescelleur O, Hould FS, Marceau S, Biron S, Lebel S, Perusse L, Lacasse Y. Health-related quality of life in morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2006;16:574–579. PubMed

De Zwaan M, Mitchell JE, Howell LM, Monson N, Swan-Kremeier L, Roerig JL, Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Two measures of health-related quality of life in morbid obesity. Obes Res. 2002;10:1143–1151. PubMed

Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, Williams GR. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:102–111. PubMed

Duval K, Marceau P, Perusse L, Lacasse Y. An overview of obesity-specific quality of life questionnaires. Obes Rev. 2006;7:347–360. PubMed

Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinée S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82:216–222. PubMed

Hassan MK, Joshi AV, Madhavan SS, Amonkar MM. Obesity and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional analysis of the US population. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27:1227–1232. PubMed

Yancy WS Jr, Olsen MK, Westman EC, Bosworth HB, Edelman D. Relationship between obesity and health-related quality of life in men. Obes Res. 2002;10:1057–1064. PubMed

Sach TH, Barton GR, Doherty M, Muir KR, Jenkinson C, Avery AJ. The relationship between body mass index and health-related quality of life: comparing the EQ-5D, EuroQol VAS and SF-6D. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007;31:189–196. PubMed

Sanchez-Santos R, Del Barrio MJ, Gonzalez C, Madico C, Terrado I, Gordillo ML, Pujol J, Moreno P, Masdevall C. Long-term health-related quality of life following gastric bypass: influence of depression. Obes Surg. 2006;16:580–585. PubMed

Marchesini G, Solaroli E, Baraldi L, Natale S, Migliorini S, Visani F, Forlani G, Melchionda N. Health-related quality of life in obesity: the role of eating behaviour. Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2000;13:156–164. PubMed

EQ-5D in Central and Eastern Europe: 2000-2015