High-dose immunoablation with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aggressive multiple sclerosis: a single centre 10-year experience
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
20350962
DOI
10.1177/1352458510364538
PII: 1352458510364538
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Cyclophosphamide therapeutic use MeSH
- Cytarabine MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Etoposide MeSH
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor therapeutic use MeSH
- Immunosuppression Therapy methods MeSH
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate MeSH
- Carmustine MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Melphalan MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols MeSH
- Multiple Sclerosis therapy MeSH
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation MeSH
- Age Factors MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cyclophosphamide MeSH
- Cytarabine MeSH
- Etoposide MeSH
- Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor MeSH
- Carmustine MeSH
- Melphalan MeSH
There are multiple sclerosis patients who suffer from an aggressive course of the disease with severe relapses and rapid accumulation of disability despite adequate treatment. In such cases high-dose immunoablation with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may be considered. Our objective was to report our experience with 26 multiple sclerosis patients treated with ASCT within the years 1998-2008. Twenty-six patients (Expanded Disability Status Scale 2.5-7.5 (median 6.0), multiple sclerosis duration 2-19 years (median 7)) with aggressive multiple sclerosis underwent autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Stem cells were mobilized by high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) was used for immunoablation. Patients were evaluated at baseline and every six months post ASCT for adverse events and clinical outcome. Follow-up period was 11-132 months (median 66). Progression-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan- Meier method. At 3 and 6 years of follow-up 70.8% and 29.2% of patients respectively were free of progression. Patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis course, disease duration <5 years and age <35 years had a more favourable outcome. There was no death within 100 days after ASCT. We conclude that ASCT represents a viable and effective treatment option for aggressive multiple sclerosis.
References provided by Crossref.org
Long-term Outcomes After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Sclerosis