Expressivity of apomixis in 2n + n hybrids from an apomictic and a sexual parent: insights into variation detected in Pilosella (Asteraceae: Lactuceae)

. 2011 Mar ; 24 (1) : 63-74. [epub] 20101027

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid20978805

Reproductive variation was studied in the tetraploid Pilosella aurantiaca, hexaploid P. rubra (both species with facultative autonomous apospory) and in their 2n + n hybrids, which were obtained by crossing with a sexual pollen parent (tetraploid P. officinarum). The different DNA content in P. aurantiaca and P. officinarum demonstrated the actual 2n + n origin, both spontaneous from the field and through experimental crosses, of their hexaploid hybrids. The octoploid 2n + n progeny were recovered from an experimental cross of P. rubra and P. officinarum. The reproductive pathways operating in two maternal facultatively apomictic species and in the hybrids were quantified using a flow cytometric analysis of seeds obtained from either open-pollinated or emasculated plants. Whereas both maternal species displayed a high penetrance of apomixis, the level of apomixis among the majority of 2n + n hybrids was much lower and variable. Some of the hexaploid hybrids had a reduced seed set. Compared to the respective maternal parents, the decrease in apomixis due to haploid parthenogenesis and/or n + n mating was evident in almost all unreduced hybrids, irrespective of their field/experimental origin and ploidy. Hence, the reproductive behaviour in the apomictic maternal parent was profoundly different from that of the 2n + n hybrids with a sexual parent in spite of the preservation of the complete maternal genome in the hybrids. The regulatory interactions in hybrid genomes, such as effects of modifiers, heterochrony, and epigenetic control, may be consistent with the different expressivity of apomixis observed under different genetic backgrounds.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Plant Mol Biol. 2004 Dec;56(6):879-94 PubMed

Genetics. 2003 Nov;165(3):1521-31 PubMed

Trends Genet. 2001 Oct;17(10):597-604 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2010 Mar;22(3):655-71 PubMed

Heredity (Edinb). 2006 Apr;96(4):322-34 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2005 Jan;17(1):13-24 PubMed

Heredity (Edinb). 2000 Feb;84 ( Pt 2):228-37 PubMed

Methods Cell Biol. 1990;33:105-10 PubMed

Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1323-35 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2008 Sep;20(9):2372-86 PubMed

Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:509-37 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2003 Jul;15(7):1524-37 PubMed

Hereditas. 2003;138(1):11-20 PubMed

Plant J. 2000 Jan;21(1):97-108 PubMed

Ann Bot. 2008 Jan;101(1):59-71 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2004;16 Suppl:S228-45 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Jun 29;358(1434):1095-103 PubMed

Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:547-74 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 5;103(49):18650-5 PubMed

Plant J. 2009 Jun;58(5):870-82 PubMed

Hereditas. 2004;141(1):19-30 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...