The intriguing complexity of parthenogenesis inheritance in Pilosella rubra (Asteraceae, Lactuceae)

. 2012 Sep ; 25 (3) : 185-96. [epub] 20120619

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid22710794

Neither the genetic basis nor the inheritance of apomixis is fully understood in plants. The present study is focused on the inheritance of parthenogenesis, one of the basic elements of apomixis, in Pilosella (Asteraceae). A complex pattern of inheritance was recorded in the segregating F(1) progeny recovered from reciprocal crosses between the facultatively apomictic hexaploid P. rubra and the sexual tetraploid P. officinarum. Although both female and male reduced gametes of P. rubra transmitted parthenogenesis at the same rate in the reciprocal crosses, the resulting segregating F(1) progeny inherited parthenogenesis at different rates. The actual transmission rates of parthenogenesis were significantly correlated with the mode of origin of the respective F(1) progeny class. The inheritance of parthenogenesis was significantly reduced in F(1) n + n hybrid progeny from the cross where parthenogenesis was transmitted by female gametes. In F(1) n + 0 polyhaploid progeny from the same cross, however, the transmission rate of parthenogenesis was high; all fertile polyhaploids were parthenogenetic. It appeared that reduced female gametes transmitting parthenogenesis preferentially developed parthenogenetically and only rarely were fertilized in P. rubra. The fact that the determinant for parthenogenesis acts gametophytically in Pilosella and the precocious embryogenesis in parthenogenesis-transmitting megagametophytes was suggested as the most probable explanations for this observation. Furthermore, we observed the different expression of complete apomixis in the non-segregating F(1) 2n + n hybrids as compared to their apomictic maternal parent P. rubra. We suggest that this difference is a result of unspecified interactions between the parental genomes.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Hereditas. 2003;138(1):11-20 PubMed

Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1425-1437 PubMed

J Exp Bot. 2011 Mar;62(5):1699-707 PubMed

Heredity (Edinb). 2000 Feb;84 ( Pt 2):228-37 PubMed

Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1323-35 PubMed

Theor Appl Genet. 1986 Apr;72(1):33-6 PubMed

Heredity (Edinb). 1998 Jan;80 ( Pt 1):40-7 PubMed

Evolution. 1968 Jun;22(2):394-397 PubMed

Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:509-37 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 2011 Nov;157(3):1327-41 PubMed

Sex Plant Reprod. 2011 Mar;24(1):63-74 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2004;16 Suppl:S228-45 PubMed

Plant Physiol. 1995 Aug;108(4):1345-1352 PubMed

Evolution. 1982 May;36(3):596-600 PubMed

Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:2-9 PubMed

Methods Cell Biol. 1990;33:105-10 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 5;103(49):18650-5 PubMed

Hereditas. 2004;141(1):19-30 PubMed

Plant J. 2011 Jun;66(5):890-902 PubMed

Plant Cell. 2001 Jul;13(7):1491-8 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...