The intriguing complexity of parthenogenesis inheritance in Pilosella rubra (Asteraceae, Lactuceae)
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- apomixie genetika fyziologie MeSH
- Asteraceae genetika fyziologie MeSH
- chromozomy rostlin genetika MeSH
- genom rostlinný genetika MeSH
- hybridizace genetická MeSH
- partenogeneze genetika fyziologie MeSH
- polyploidie MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie MeSH
- rozmnožování MeSH
- typy dědičnosti MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Neither the genetic basis nor the inheritance of apomixis is fully understood in plants. The present study is focused on the inheritance of parthenogenesis, one of the basic elements of apomixis, in Pilosella (Asteraceae). A complex pattern of inheritance was recorded in the segregating F(1) progeny recovered from reciprocal crosses between the facultatively apomictic hexaploid P. rubra and the sexual tetraploid P. officinarum. Although both female and male reduced gametes of P. rubra transmitted parthenogenesis at the same rate in the reciprocal crosses, the resulting segregating F(1) progeny inherited parthenogenesis at different rates. The actual transmission rates of parthenogenesis were significantly correlated with the mode of origin of the respective F(1) progeny class. The inheritance of parthenogenesis was significantly reduced in F(1) n + n hybrid progeny from the cross where parthenogenesis was transmitted by female gametes. In F(1) n + 0 polyhaploid progeny from the same cross, however, the transmission rate of parthenogenesis was high; all fertile polyhaploids were parthenogenetic. It appeared that reduced female gametes transmitting parthenogenesis preferentially developed parthenogenetically and only rarely were fertilized in P. rubra. The fact that the determinant for parthenogenesis acts gametophytically in Pilosella and the precocious embryogenesis in parthenogenesis-transmitting megagametophytes was suggested as the most probable explanations for this observation. Furthermore, we observed the different expression of complete apomixis in the non-segregating F(1) 2n + n hybrids as compared to their apomictic maternal parent P. rubra. We suggest that this difference is a result of unspecified interactions between the parental genomes.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Hereditas. 2003;138(1):11-20 PubMed
Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1425-1437 PubMed
J Exp Bot. 2011 Mar;62(5):1699-707 PubMed
Heredity (Edinb). 2000 Feb;84 ( Pt 2):228-37 PubMed
Ann Bot. 2007 Dec;100(6):1323-35 PubMed
Theor Appl Genet. 1986 Apr;72(1):33-6 PubMed
Heredity (Edinb). 1998 Jan;80 ( Pt 1):40-7 PubMed
Evolution. 1968 Jun;22(2):394-397 PubMed
Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:509-37 PubMed
Plant Physiol. 2011 Nov;157(3):1327-41 PubMed
Sex Plant Reprod. 2011 Mar;24(1):63-74 PubMed
Plant Cell. 2004;16 Suppl:S228-45 PubMed
Plant Physiol. 1995 Aug;108(4):1345-1352 PubMed
Evolution. 1982 May;36(3):596-600 PubMed
Mutat Res. 1964 May;106:2-9 PubMed
Methods Cell Biol. 1990;33:105-10 PubMed
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 5;103(49):18650-5 PubMed
Hereditas. 2004;141(1):19-30 PubMed
Plant J. 2011 Jun;66(5):890-902 PubMed
Plant Cell. 2001 Jul;13(7):1491-8 PubMed