Detection of intracranial arterial stenosis using transcranial color-coded duplex sonography, computed tomographic angiography, and digital subtraction angiography
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
21795482
DOI
10.7863/jum.2011.30.8.1069
PII: 30/8/1069
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Stroke diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Angiography, Digital Subtraction methods MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cerebral Angiography methods MeSH
- Cerebrovascular Circulation * MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare intracranial arterial stenosis in patients with stroke using 3 different methods: transcranial color-coded duplex sonography, computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in a common clinical practice. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients (47 male and 20 female; age range, 23-79 years; mean age ± SD, 62.0 ± 9.5 years) were enrolled in this study over 40 months. All patients underwent examinations of the intracranial arteries using transcranial color-coded sonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Findings were divided into 4 groups: normal, mild stenosis (<50%), severe stenosis (50%-99%), and occlusion. RESULTS: Because of technical reasons or an insufficient bone window, 465 of 536 arterial segments in 67 patients were evaluated; 12 stenotic and 15 occluded segments were detected using digital subtraction angiography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of transcranial color-coded sonography and CT angiography in comparison with digital subtraction angiography as a reference standard were 88.9%, 94.8%, 51.1%, and 99.3% and 81.5%, 98.7%, 78.6%, and 98.6%, respectively. The agreement between transcranial color-coded sonography and CT angiography was 93.8% (κ = 0.559); between transcranial color-coded sonography and digital subtraction angiography, it was 93.9% (κ = 0.588); and between CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography, it was 96.6% (κ = 0.697). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found between CT angiography, transcranial color-coded sonography, and digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of intracranial stenosis. Computed tomographic angiography and digital subtraction angiography are sufficient for assessment of the diagnosis.
References provided by Crossref.org