• This record comes from PubMed

Age estimation based on a combined arteriosclerotic index

. 2012 Mar ; 126 (2) : 321-6. [epub] 20111213

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

This study introduces a new quantity, the combined arteriosclerotic index (CAI), which is defined as the ratio between the diameter and the longitudinal prestrain of an artery. The longitudinal prestrain has been adopted as the ratio between the in situ length and the excised length of the abdominal aorta, and is a measure of arterial elasticity. During ageing, arteriosclerosis is manifested by the loss of pretension and by enlargement of the diameter of the artery. CAI combines these two effects. A sample of 61 female and 194 male autopsy measurements of human abdominal aortas shows that CAI correlates significantly with chronological age (R = 0.916/0.921; female/male). The sample had the following parameters: age 53 ± 19/48 ± 16 years; diameter of the abdominal aorta 12.4 ± 2.2/13.4 ± 2.1 mm; and longitudinal prestrain 1.13 ± 0.10/1.15 ± 0.10 (mean ± sample standard deviation; female/male). The resulting CAI was 11.2 ± 2.7/11.9 ± 2.6 mm. The classical linear regression model was employed for age estimation by CAI. The model gave a residual standard deviation of 7.6/6.3 years and a 95% prediction interval range of ± 15.4/12.5 years (female/male). A two-sample t-test confirmed that there are significant differences between the female and male population during ageing, reflected by CAI, unlike longitudinal prestrain. It was concluded that CAI is a suitable predictor of age at time of death and is easily obtainable in the autopsy room.

See more in PubMed

Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Feb 25;195(1-3):58-62 PubMed

Vasc Med. 2007 Nov;12(4):329-41 PubMed

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jul 3;50(1):1-13 PubMed

Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Jul 15;200(1-3):148-52 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2007 Mar;121(2):158-62 PubMed

Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Jun;282(6):H2427-40 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2012 Jan;126(1):145-55 PubMed

Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Dec 15;193(1-3):1-13 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2000;114(1-2):83-6 PubMed

Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Dec 15;203(1-3):34-43 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2009 Jul;123(4):277-83 PubMed

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Nov;4(8):2128-32 PubMed

Circ Res. 1966 Mar;18(3):278-92 PubMed

Leg Med (Tokyo). 2011 May;13(3):120-33 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2008 Jan;122(1):51-4 PubMed

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Nov;105(5):1643-51 PubMed

Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jan 10;214(1-3):18-22 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2000;113(3):129-36 PubMed

J Biomech Eng. 2003 Jun;125(3):395-406 PubMed

J R Soc Interface. 2006 Dec 22;3(11):719-40 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2003 Apr;117(2):96-101 PubMed

Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2007 Jul;34(7):665-71 PubMed

Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1981 Oct;59(10):1050-7 PubMed

J Pathol. 2007 Jan;211(2):157-72 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2004 Feb;118(1):5-8 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 2010 Jul;124(4):269-75 PubMed

Int J Legal Med. 1993;105(5):289-93 PubMed

J Biomech. 2003 May;36(5):661-70 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...