Lantibiotics biosynthesis genes and bacteriocinogenic activity of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from raw milk and cheese

. 2012 May ; 57 (3) : 183-90. [epub] 20120324

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid22447149

Lactobacillus species are usually used as starters for the production of fermented products, and some strains are capable of producing antimicrobial substances, such as bacteriocins. Because these characteristics are highly desirable, research are continually being performed for novel Lactobacillus strains with bacteriocinogenic potential for use by food industries. The aim of this study was to characterise the bacteriocinogenic potential and activity of Lactobacillus isolates. From a lactic acid bacteria culture collection obtained from raw milk and cheese, 27 isolates were identified by 16S rDNA as Lactobacillus spp. and selected for the detection of lantibiotics biosynthesis genes, bacteriocin production, antimicrobial spectra, and ideal incubation conditions for bacteriocin production. Based on the obtained results, 21 isolates presented at least one of the three lantibiotics biosynthesis genes (lanB, lanC or lamM), and 23 isolates also produced antimicrobial substances with sensitivity to at least one proteinase, indicating their bacteriocinogenic activity. In general, the isolates had broad inhibitory activity, mainly against Listeria spp. and Staphylococcus spp. strains, and the best antimicrobial performance of the isolates occurred when they were cultivated at 25 °C for 24 or 48 h or at 35 °C for 12 h. The present study identified the bacteriocinogenic potential of Lactobacillus isolates obtained from raw milk and cheese, suggesting their potential use as biopreservatives in foods.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Oct;3(10):777-88 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Jan 1;113(1):67-74 PubMed

J Biotechnol. 2005 Jun 29;117(4):343-54 PubMed

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2000 Jul;31(1):68-72 PubMed

Zoonoses Public Health. 2008 Aug;55(6):299-305 PubMed

Meat Sci. 2007 Aug;76(4):591-6 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Dec 15;97(2):147-56 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Mar 15;107(2):207-11 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2001 Feb 28;64(1-2):193-8 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):439-45 PubMed

Food Microbiol. 2010 Sep;27(6):691-7 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Nov 15;252(2):235-41 PubMed

Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2010 Apr;21(2):142-8 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 Jun 30;42(1-2):119-26 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Feb;72(2):1148-56 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994 Jun;60(6):2158-63 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1996;41(2):130-6 PubMed

Food Microbiol. 2010 Jun;27(4):447-52 PubMed

J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(1):77-84 PubMed

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1993 Sep;12(1-3):39-85 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Apr 15;130(3):251-7 PubMed

Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2008;53(5):378-94 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Aug 15;95(1):11-8 PubMed

Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2010 Feb;7(2):175-80 PubMed

Meat Sci. 2003 Jul;64(3):265-71 PubMed

Int J Food Microbiol. 2009 Nov 30;136(1):75-82 PubMed

J Dairy Sci. 2010 Jul;93(7):2880-6 PubMed

Vet Microbiol. 2009 Mar 30;135(3-4):346-57 PubMed

Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Jun;57(6):1683-8 PubMed

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2004 Apr;85(3):191-8 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace