• This record comes from PubMed

Avidity of anti-neurocytoskeletal antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid and serum

. 2012 Sep ; 57 (5) : 415-9. [epub] 20120508

Language English Country United States Media print-electronic

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Antibodies have different avidities that can be evaluated using modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. We determined levels and avidities of antibodies to light (NFL) and medium (NFM) subunits of neurofilaments and tau protein in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 26 patients and anti-tau antibody levels and their avidities in 20 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 20 age- and sex-matched controls. Each sample was analyzed using both standard ELISA and also using a similar ELISA protocol with the addition of urea. The avidities of anti-neurocytoskeletal antibodies were higher in the CSF than those in serum (anti-NFL, p < 0.0001; anti-tau, p < 0.01; anti-NFM, n.s.). There was no relationship between avidities in serum and CSF for individual anti-neurocytoskeletal antibodies. We did not observe the relationship among the avidities of various anti-neurocytoskeletal antibodies. The avidities of anti-tau antibodies in the CSF were significantly higher in the MS patients than those in the controls (p < 0.0001). The study demonstrates the differences in avidities of CSF or serum neurocytoskeletal antibodies measured as the urea resistance by ELISA method. Avidity determination of anti-neurocytoskeletal antibodies could contribute to the evaluation of the immunological status of patients.

See more in PubMed

Folia Biol (Praha). 2009;55(1):23-6 PubMed

Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227-31 PubMed

Neurol Sci. 2003 Dec;24 Suppl 5:S279-82 PubMed

Neurosci Lett. 2004 Jun 3;363(1):14-7 PubMed

J Neurol. 2007 Jan;254(1):20-5 PubMed

N Engl J Med. 2003 Jul 10;349(2):139-45 PubMed

Lab Invest. 2008 Aug;88(8):796-807 PubMed

J Neuroimmunol. 2006 Nov;180(1-2):29-32 PubMed

Acta Neurol Scand. 2007 Aug;116(2):100-7 PubMed

Acta Neurol Scand. 2005 Feb;111(2):114-7 PubMed

J Med Virol. 1997 Jul;52(3):275-9 PubMed

Mol Immunol. 1993 Aug;30(12):1133-42 PubMed

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006 Jul-Sep;20(3):127-32 PubMed

Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):907-11 PubMed

Eur J Neurol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1329-33 PubMed

Clin Immunol. 2005 Jul;116(1):77-82 PubMed

Neurosci Lett. 2006 Dec 20;410(2):90-3 PubMed

Mult Scler. 2005 Oct;11(5):532-6 PubMed

Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52 PubMed

Ann Neurol. 2001 Jul;50(1):121-7 PubMed

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004 Jul;11(4):669-74 PubMed

J Neuroimmunol. 2003 Jun;139(1-2):76-80 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Jun;43(6):2793-7 PubMed

Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996 Mar;3(2):211-5 PubMed

J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Nov;43(11):5784-6 PubMed

Neurosci Lett. 2001 Mar 9;300(2):95-8 PubMed

Eur J Neurol. 2008 Nov;15(11):1173-9 PubMed

Brain Res Bull. 2006 Jan 15;68(4):213-6 PubMed

J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2007 Apr;66(4):295-304 PubMed

Neurology. 2002 May 14;58(9):1372-81 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...