Evidence-based strategies for the optimization of pharmacotherapy in older people
Language English Country New Zealand Media print
Document type Journal Article, Review
PubMed
22642782
DOI
10.2165/11632400-000000000-00000
PII: 8
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Drug Therapy methods standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Geriatrics methods standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Assessment of Medication Adherence MeSH
- Drug Prescriptions statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Evidence-Based Medicine methods standards MeSH
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions MeSH
- Self Medication statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
Geriatric pharmacotherapy represents one of the biggest achievements of modern medical interventions. However, geriatric pharmacotherapy is a complex process that encompasses not only drug prescribing but also age-appropriate drug development and manufacturing, appropriate drug testing in clinical trials, rational and safe prescribing, reliable administration and assessment of drug effects, including adherence measurement and age-appropriate outcomes monitoring. During this complex process, errors can occur at any stage, and intervention strategies to improve geriatric pharmacotherapy are targeted at improving the regulatory processes of drug testing, reducing inappropriate prescribing, preventing beneficial drug underuse and use of potentially harmful drugs, and preventing adverse drug interactions. The aim of this review is to provide an update on selected recent developments in geriatric pharmacotherapy, including age discrimination in drug trials, a new healthcare professional qualification and shared competence in geriatric drug therapy, the usefulness of information and communication technologies, and pharmacogenetics. We also review optimizing strategies aimed at medication adherence focusing on complex elderly patients. Among the current information technologies, there is sufficient evidence that computerized decision-making support systems are modestly but significantly effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing and adverse drug events across healthcare settings. The majority of interventions target physicians, for whom the scientific concept of appropriate prescribing and the acceptability of the alert system used play crucial roles in the intervention's success. For prescribing optimization, results of educational intervention strategies were inconsistent. The more promising strategies involved pharmacists or multidisciplinary teams including geriatric medicine services. However, methodological weaknesses including population and intervention heterogeneity do not allow for comprehensive meta-analyses to determine the clinical value of individual approaches. In relation to drug adherence, a recent meta-analysis of 33 randomized clinical trials in older patients found behavioural interventions had significant effects, and these interventions were more effective than educational interventions. For patients with multiple conditions and polypharmacy, successful interventions included structured medication review, medication regimen simplification, administration aids and medication reminders, but no firm conclusion in favour of any particular intervention could be made. Interventions to optimize geriatric pharmacotherapy focused most commonly on pharmacological outcomes (drug appropriateness, adverse drug events, adherence), providing only limited information about clinical outcomes in terms of health status, morbidity, functionality and overall healthcare costs. Little attention was given to psychosocial and behavioural aspects of pharmacotherapy. There is sufficient potential for improvements in geriatric pharmacotherapy in terms of drug safety and effectiveness. However, just as we require evidence-based, age-specific, pharmacological information for efficient clinical decision making, we need solid evidence for strategies that consistently improve the quality of pharmacological treatments at the health system level to shape 'age-attuned' health and drug policy.
See more in PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 May;47(5):592-6 PubMed
Gerontologist. 2006 Oct;46(5):661-8 PubMed
Am Heart J. 2006 Sep;152(3):585-92 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):463-75 PubMed
BMJ. 2006 Sep 9;333(7567):522 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2010 Jun 1;27(6):507-21 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(4):307-24 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):437-52 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2011 Aug 1;28(8):667-77 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2011 May 1;28(5):391-402 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 30;351(27):2870-4 PubMed
Postgrad Med J. 2001 Nov;77(913):703-7 PubMed
JAMA. 2010 Oct 13;304(14):1592-601 PubMed
Age Ageing. 2001 Jan;30(1):33-40 PubMed
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Mar 28;171(6):550-6 PubMed
CMAJ. 2003 Sep 16;169(6):549-56 PubMed
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Feb;22(1):11-9 PubMed
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):394-401 PubMed
Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Feb;45(2):201-6 PubMed
JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2563-71 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):453-62 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jul;55(7):977-85 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2010 Oct 1;27(10):831-43 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2009;26(12):1013-28 PubMed
Gerontologist. 2009 Aug;49(4):447-62 PubMed
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jul;63(2):132-43 PubMed
Am J Med. 1996 Apr;100(4):428-37 PubMed
Clin Lab. 2011;57(11-12):887-93 PubMed
BMC Geriatr. 2009 Jul 13;9:27 PubMed
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Nov 21;145(10):749-57 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Jan;52(1):112-6 PubMed
Lancet. 2007 Jul 14;370(9582):173-184 PubMed
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jul;42(7):1026-36 PubMed
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2001 May-Jun;41(3):411-20 PubMed
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011 Feb;9(1):11-23 PubMed
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 May;51(5):367-75 PubMed
Telemed J E Health. 2009 Oct;15(8):770-6 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Jun;58(6):1202-3 PubMed
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;13(12):1067-76 PubMed
JAMA. 2005 Aug 10;294(6):716-24 PubMed
Curr Med Chem. 2010;17(6):571-84 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 1990 Apr 26;322(17):1207-14 PubMed
Patient Educ Couns. 1990 Oct;16(2):151-60 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2004;21(12):793-811 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Aug;57(8):1388-94 PubMed
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul;44(7):297-302 PubMed
JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1233-40 PubMed
Cas Lek Cesk. 2006;145(9):726-32 PubMed
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD000011 PubMed
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011 Feb;36(1):80-6 PubMed
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Dec;61(12):921-8 PubMed
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Jun;6(2):119-29 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2012 Jun 1;29(6):495-510 PubMed
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jun;22(6):864-71 PubMed
Curr Drug Metab. 2011 Sep;12(7):621-34 PubMed
JAMA. 2002 Apr 3;287(13):1690-8 PubMed
J Behav Med. 2008 Jun;31(3):213-24 PubMed
Neurology. 2009 Sep 8;73(10):761-7 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Sep;58(9):1791-6 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(12):1033-47 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(1):63-77 PubMed
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005 Dec;3(4):255-61 PubMed
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Mar-Apr;13(2):138-47 PubMed
Age Ageing. 2011 Mar;40(2):150-62 PubMed
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Sep;4(3):264-72 PubMed
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2006 Mar;4(1):62-9 PubMed
JAMA. 2010 Oct 13;304(14):1606-7 PubMed
Age Ageing. 2004 Nov;33(6):612-7 PubMed
Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010 Jun;8(3):183-200 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Aug;59(8):1540-1 PubMed
Ann Longterm Care. 2010 May;18(5):17-22 PubMed
Gastroenterology. 2007 Aug;133(2):465-71 PubMed
Ageing Res Rev. 2010 Oct;9(4):384-98 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2009 Dec;26 Suppl 1:3-13 PubMed
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Aug 9;170(15):1331-6 PubMed
J Aging Health. 2009 Jun;21(4):567-80 PubMed
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2006 Mar;61(2):P102-7 PubMed
Pharm World Sci. 2007 Oct;29(5):517-25 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2225-33 PubMed
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Feb;59(2):376-7 PubMed
J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Jan;14(1):57-61 PubMed
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Jan;35(1):29-35 PubMed
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2010;23(6):571-82 PubMed
Pharm World Sci. 2003 Oct;25(5):218-26 PubMed
Drugs Aging. 2010 Mar 1;27(3):239-54 PubMed