Absence of gene flow between diploids and hexaploids of Aster amellus at multiple spatial scales
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
23169557
PubMed Central
PMC3554448
DOI
10.1038/hdy.2012.87
PII: hdy201287
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- analýza hlavních komponent MeSH
- Aster genetika MeSH
- Bayesova věta MeSH
- diploidie * MeSH
- fylogeografie MeSH
- genetická variace MeSH
- mikrosatelitní repetice MeSH
- modely genetické MeSH
- polyploidie * MeSH
- rostlinné geny MeSH
- tok genů * MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
The potential for gene exchange across ploidy levels has long been recognized, but only a few studies have explored the rate of gene flow among different cytotypes. In addition, most of the existing knowledge comes from contact zones between diploids and tetraploids. The purpose of this paper was to investigate relationships between diploid and hexaploid individuals within the Aster amellus aggregate. A. amellus is known to occur in diploid and hexaploid cytotypes in Europe, with a complex contact zone in central Europe. Patterns of genetic diversity were investigated using seven microsatellite loci at three different spatial scales: (1) in the single known mixed-ploidy population; (2) in populations at the contact zone and (3) in a wider range of populations across Europe. The results show clear separation of the cytotypes at all three spatial scales. In addition, analysis of molecular variance strongly supported a model predicting a single origin of the hexaploids, with no or very limited gene flow between the cytotypes. Some hexaploid individuals found in the mixed-ploidy population, however, fell into the diploid cluster. This could suggest recurrent polyploid formation or occasional cross-pollination between cytotypes; however, there are strong post-zygotic breeding barriers between the two cytotypes, making the latter less plausible. Overall, the results suggest that the cytotypes could represent two cryptic species. Nevertheless, their formal separation is difficult as they cannot be distinguished morphologically, occupy very similar habitat conditions and have largely overlapping distribution ranges. These results show that polyploid complexes must be treated with caution as they can hide biological diversity and can have different adaptation potentials, evolving independently.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Bruvo R, Michiels NK, D'Souza TG, Schulenburg H. A simple method for the calculation of microsatellite genotype distances irrespective of ploidy level. Mol Ecol. 2004;13:2101–2106. PubMed
Buggs RJA, Pannell JR. Ecological differentiation and diploid superiority across a moving ploidy contact zone. Evolution. 2007;61:125–140. PubMed
Castro S, Loureiro J, Procházka T, Münzbergová Z. Cytotype distribution at a diploid-hexaploid contact zone in Aster amellus L. (Asteraceae) Ann Bot. 2012;110:1047–1055. PubMed PMC
Castro S, Münzbergová Z, Raabová J, Loureiro J. Breeding barriers at a diploid–hexaploid contact zone in Aster amellus. Evol Ecol. 2011;25:795–814. PubMed
Chapman MA, Abbott RJ. Introgression of fitness genes across a ploidy barrier. New Phytol. 2010;186:63–71. PubMed
Clark LV, Jasieniuk M. POLYSAT: an R package for polyploid microsatellite analysis. Mol Ecol Res. 2011;11:562–566. PubMed
Excoffier L, Smouse P, Quattro J. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992;131:479–491. PubMed PMC
Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:574–578. PubMed PMC
Fehlberg SD, Ferguson CJ. Intraspecific cytotypic variation and complicated genetic structure in the Phlox amabilis-P. woodhousei (Polemoniaceae) complex. Am J Bot. 2012;99:865–874. PubMed
Halverson K, Heard SB, Nason JD, Stireman JO. Differential attack on diploid, tetraploid, and hexaploid Solidago altissima L. by five insect gallmakers. Oecologia. 2008;154:755–761. PubMed
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. Patterns of allozyme variation in diploid and tetraploid Centaurea jacea at different spatial scales. Evolution. 2001;55:943–954. PubMed
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes. 2002;2:618–620.
Kaeuffer R, Réale D, Coltman DW, Pontier D. Detecting population structure using STRUCTURE software: effect of background linkage disequilibrium. Heredity. 2007;99:374–80. PubMed
Kloda JM, Dean PD, Maddren C, MacDonald DW, Mayes S. Using principle component analysis to compare genetic diversity across polyploidy levels within plant complexes: an example from British Restharrows (Ononis spinosa and Ononis repens) Heredity. 2008;100:253–260. PubMed
Levin D. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon. 1975;24:35–43.
Mahy G, Bruederle LP, Connors B, Van Hofwegen M, Vorsa N. Allozyme evidence for genetic autopolyploidy and high genetic diversity in tetraploid cranberry, Vaccinium oxycoccos (Ericaceae) Am J Bot. 2000;87:1882–1889. PubMed
Mandáková T, Münzbergová Z. Distribution and ecology of cytotypes of the Aster amellus aggregates in the Czech Republic. Ann Bot. 2006;98:845–856. PubMed PMC
Mandáková T, Münzbergová Z. Morphometric and genetic differentiation of diploid and hexaploid populations of Aster amellus agg. in a contact zone. Plant Syst Evol. 2008;274:155–170.
Masterson J. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science. 1994;264:421–424. PubMed
Mayor R, Naciri Y. Identification and characterization of eight microsatellite loci in Aster amellus L. (Asteraceae) Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:233–235.
Moody ME, Mueller LD, Soltis DE. Genetic variation and random drift in autotetraploid populations. Genetics. 1993;134:649–657. PubMed PMC
Mráz P, Spaniel S, Keller A, Bowmann G, Farkas A, Singliarova B, et al. Anthropogenic disturbance as a driver of microspatial and microhabitat segregation of cytotypes of Centaurea stoebe and cytotype interactions in secondary contact zones. Ann Bot. 2012;110:615–627. PubMed PMC
Münzbergová Z, Raabová J, Castro S, Pánková H. Biological flora of central Europe: Aster amellus L. (Asteraceae) Persp Plant Ecol, Evol Syst. 2011;13:151–162.
Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6:288–295. PubMed PMC
Petit C, Bretagnolle F, Felber F. Evolutionary consequences of diploid-polyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999;14:306–311. PubMed
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly PJ. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945–959. PubMed PMC
Raabová J, Fischer M, Münzbergová Z. Niche differentiation between diploid and hexaploid Aster amellus. Oecologia. 2008;158:463–472. PubMed
Ramsey J, Robertson A, Husband BC. Rapid adaptive divergence in New World Achillea, an autopolyploid complex of ecological races. Evolution. 2008;62:639–653. PubMed
Rodriguez DJ. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants. Am Nat. 1996;147:33–46.
Ronfort J, Jenczewskia E, Bataillona T, Roussetb F. Analysis of population structure in autotetraploid species. Genetics. 1998;150:921–930. PubMed PMC
Segraves KA, Thompson JN, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Multiple origins of polyploidy and the geographic structure of Heuchera grossulariifolia. Mol Ecol. 2002;8:253–262.
Slotte T, Ceplitis A, Neuffer B, Hurka H, Lascoux M. Intrageneric phylogeny of Capsella (Brassicaceae) and the origin of the tetraploid C. bursa-pastoris based on chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Am J Bot. 2006;93:1714–1724. PubMed
Slotte T, Huang H, Lascoux M, Ceplitis A. Polyploid speciation did not confer instant reproductive isolation in Capsella (Brassicaceae) Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:1472–1481. PubMed
Soltis DE, Albert VA, Leebens-Mack J, Bell CD, Paterson AH, Zheng CF, et al. Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification. Am J Bot. 2009;96:336–348. PubMed
Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999;14:348–352. PubMed
Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Schemske DW, Hancock JF, Thompson JN, Husband BC, et al. Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: have we grossly underestimated the number of species. Taxon. 2007;56:13–30.
Stebbins GJ. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press New York; 1950.
Stebbins GJ. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Addison-Wesley London; 1971.
Symonds VV, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. Dynamics of polyploid formation in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): Recurrent formation, gene flow, and population structure. Evolution. 2010;64:1984–2003. PubMed
Trávníček P, Eliášová A, Suda J. The distribution of cytotypes of Vicia cracca in Central Europe: the changes that have occurred over the last four decades. Preslia. 2010;82:149–163.
Štorchová H, Hrdličková R, Chrtek J, Tetera M, Fitze D, Fehrer J. An improved method of DNA isolation from plants collected in the field and conserved in saturated NaCl/CTAB solution. Taxon. 2000;49:79–84.
Unmasking cryptic biodiversity in polyploids: origin and diversification of Aster amellus aggregate