Haemosporidian parasites of a European passerine wintering in South Asia: diversity, mixed infections and effect on host condition

. 2013 Apr ; 112 (4) : 1667-77. [epub] 20130206

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid23385972

We studied haemosporidian parasites in the scarlet rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus in a small isolated semicolony during an eight-year period using molecular methods of parasite detection. The scarlet rosefinch is an interesting model of parasite host species. It winters in South Asia which represents a rare exception among European passerines. Males express yellow to red carotenoid-based plumage ornament which is a good predictor of male reproductive success. In 240 blood samples originating from 199 adult individuals, the total parasite prevalence reached 60%. Prevalence varied among years from 36 to 81% in Haemoproteus, 8 to 22% in Plasmodium, and 0 to 14% in Leucocytozoon. Twenty parasite lineages were detected (Haemoproteus: 5 lineages, Plasmodium: 10 lineages, and Leucocytozoon: 5 lineages). Among them, the Haemoproteus ROFI2 lineage, which is a host-specific parasite lineage of the scarlet rosefinch, was the most frequently found. Parasite lineages showed varying degree of lineage specificity. While Haemoproteus lineages detected in the scarlet rosefinch have relatively narrow host breadth restricted mainly to Fringillidae family, Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium lineages generally showed wider host range. The presence of some parasite lineages hitherto detected in sedentary European passerines (SISKIN1, CCF3, BT2) or in Culicoides biting midges at the same locality (ROFI1) suggest local transmission. On the contrary, lineages LK05 and FANTAIL1 that were previously reported exclusively from Asian hosts imply parasite transmission at the scarlet rosefinch wintering sites in South Asia. Mixed infections were found in 17% of infected samples and comprised mainly the most frequent lineages. The pattern of concomitant infections seemed to be rather random and matched expected levels based on lineage frequencies. Between-year comparisons revealed that in a majority of the repeatedly captured individual hosts the infection status remained unchanged (individuals stayed uninfected or possessed the same parasite lineages). However, 16 gains and 8 losses of lineages were also reported. We have not found any effect of haemosporidians on male carotenoid ornament expression or host body mass.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Oecologia. 2005 Feb;142(4):541-5 PubMed

J Evol Biol. 2009 Oct;22(10):2020-30 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2008 May;102(6):1185-93 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2002 Aug;88(4):819-22 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2012 Nov;111(5):2137-42 PubMed

Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2840-9 PubMed

Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Jan;97(1):19-28 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):885-92 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2009 Oct;95(5):1171-6 PubMed

J Anim Ecol. 2007 Jan;76(1):112-22 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2011 Mar;20(5):1062-76 PubMed

Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):258-65 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2008 Oct;103(5):1213-28 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2007 Sep;101(4):1153-6 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(6):1281-90 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2002 Aug;11(8):1545-54 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 22;272(1571):1511-8 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2007 Aug;16(15):3263-73 PubMed

J Evol Biol. 2010 Mar;23(3):557-69 PubMed

PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21905 PubMed

Evolution. 2004 Jul;58(7):1617-21 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2009 Apr;104(5):1061-77 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2009 Jan;39(2):257-66 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 7;267(1452):1583-9 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 7;273(1604):2935-44 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2006 Dec;92(6):1319-24 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2006 Oct;92(5):1043-9 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2006 Oct;92(5):1123-5 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2003 Oct;89(5):1044-7 PubMed

Exp Parasitol. 2008 May;119(1):99-110 PubMed

PLoS One. 2007 Feb 21;2(2):e235 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Sep;36(3):669-81 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2011 Aug;20(15):3084-6 PubMed

J Evol Biol. 2008 Jul;21(4):979-87 PubMed

Parasitology. 2006 Dec;133(Pt 6):685-92 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2507-10 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2013 Feb;112(2):839-45 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2009 Dec;95(6):1512-5 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2012 Jun;98(3):657-65 PubMed

Oecologia. 2001 Jan;126(2):166-173 PubMed

Exp Parasitol. 2008 Dec;120(4):372-80 PubMed

J Wildl Dis. 2005 Jul;41(3):532-41 PubMed

Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Sep;9(5):1353-8 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2004 Aug;90(4):797-802 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2006 Mar;15(3):753-63 PubMed

Exp Parasitol. 2011 Feb;127(2):527-33 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace