Haemosporidian parasites of a European passerine wintering in South Asia: diversity, mixed infections and effect on host condition
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- Haemosporida izolace a purifikace MeSH
- koinfekce epidemiologie parazitologie veterinární MeSH
- krev parazitologie MeSH
- nemoci ptáků epidemiologie parazitologie MeSH
- Passeriformes MeSH
- prevalence MeSH
- protozoální infekce zvířat epidemiologie parazitologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Asie MeSH
- Evropa MeSH
We studied haemosporidian parasites in the scarlet rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus in a small isolated semicolony during an eight-year period using molecular methods of parasite detection. The scarlet rosefinch is an interesting model of parasite host species. It winters in South Asia which represents a rare exception among European passerines. Males express yellow to red carotenoid-based plumage ornament which is a good predictor of male reproductive success. In 240 blood samples originating from 199 adult individuals, the total parasite prevalence reached 60%. Prevalence varied among years from 36 to 81% in Haemoproteus, 8 to 22% in Plasmodium, and 0 to 14% in Leucocytozoon. Twenty parasite lineages were detected (Haemoproteus: 5 lineages, Plasmodium: 10 lineages, and Leucocytozoon: 5 lineages). Among them, the Haemoproteus ROFI2 lineage, which is a host-specific parasite lineage of the scarlet rosefinch, was the most frequently found. Parasite lineages showed varying degree of lineage specificity. While Haemoproteus lineages detected in the scarlet rosefinch have relatively narrow host breadth restricted mainly to Fringillidae family, Leucocytozoon and Plasmodium lineages generally showed wider host range. The presence of some parasite lineages hitherto detected in sedentary European passerines (SISKIN1, CCF3, BT2) or in Culicoides biting midges at the same locality (ROFI1) suggest local transmission. On the contrary, lineages LK05 and FANTAIL1 that were previously reported exclusively from Asian hosts imply parasite transmission at the scarlet rosefinch wintering sites in South Asia. Mixed infections were found in 17% of infected samples and comprised mainly the most frequent lineages. The pattern of concomitant infections seemed to be rather random and matched expected levels based on lineage frequencies. Between-year comparisons revealed that in a majority of the repeatedly captured individual hosts the infection status remained unchanged (individuals stayed uninfected or possessed the same parasite lineages). However, 16 gains and 8 losses of lineages were also reported. We have not found any effect of haemosporidians on male carotenoid ornament expression or host body mass.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Oecologia. 2005 Feb;142(4):541-5 PubMed
J Evol Biol. 2009 Oct;22(10):2020-30 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2008 May;102(6):1185-93 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2002 Aug;88(4):819-22 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2012 Nov;111(5):2137-42 PubMed
Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2840-9 PubMed
Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Jan;97(1):19-28 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):885-92 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2009 Oct;95(5):1171-6 PubMed
J Anim Ecol. 2007 Jan;76(1):112-22 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2011 Mar;20(5):1062-76 PubMed
Ecol Lett. 2008 Mar;11(3):258-65 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2008 Oct;103(5):1213-28 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2007 Sep;101(4):1153-6 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2007 Mar;16(6):1281-90 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2002 Aug;11(8):1545-54 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 22;272(1571):1511-8 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2007 Aug;16(15):3263-73 PubMed
J Evol Biol. 2010 Mar;23(3):557-69 PubMed
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21905 PubMed
Evolution. 2004 Jul;58(7):1617-21 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2009 Apr;104(5):1061-77 PubMed
Int J Parasitol. 2009 Jan;39(2):257-66 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 7;267(1452):1583-9 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 7;273(1604):2935-44 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2006 Dec;92(6):1319-24 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2006 Oct;92(5):1043-9 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2006 Oct;92(5):1123-5 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2003 Oct;89(5):1044-7 PubMed
Exp Parasitol. 2008 May;119(1):99-110 PubMed
PLoS One. 2007 Feb 21;2(2):e235 PubMed
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Sep;36(3):669-81 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2011 Aug;20(15):3084-6 PubMed
J Evol Biol. 2008 Jul;21(4):979-87 PubMed
Parasitology. 2006 Dec;133(Pt 6):685-92 PubMed
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2507-10 PubMed
Parasitol Res. 2013 Feb;112(2):839-45 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2009 Dec;95(6):1512-5 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2012 Jun;98(3):657-65 PubMed
Oecologia. 2001 Jan;126(2):166-173 PubMed
Exp Parasitol. 2008 Dec;120(4):372-80 PubMed
J Wildl Dis. 2005 Jul;41(3):532-41 PubMed
Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Sep;9(5):1353-8 PubMed
J Parasitol. 2004 Aug;90(4):797-802 PubMed
Mol Ecol. 2006 Mar;15(3):753-63 PubMed
Exp Parasitol. 2011 Feb;127(2):527-33 PubMed
Blood parasites in northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) with an emphasis to Leucocytozoon toddi