Blood parasites in northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) with an emphasis to Leucocytozoon toddi

. 2016 Jan ; 115 (1) : 263-70. [epub] 20150914

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid26365666
Odkazy

PubMed 26365666
DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4743-1
PII: 10.1007/s00436-015-4743-1
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

Haemosporidians and trypanosomes of the northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis) population in the Czech Republic were studied by morphological and molecular methods. Despite the wide distribution of these medium-large birds of prey, virtually nothing is known about their blood parasites. During a 5-year period, altogether 88 nestlings and 15 adults were screened for haemosporidians and trypanosomes by microscopic examination of blood smears and by nested PCR. Both methods revealed consistently higher prevalence of blood protists in adults, Leucocytozoon (80.0 % in adults vs. 13.6 % in nestlings), Haemoproteus (60.0 vs. 2.3 %), Plasmodium (6.7 vs. 0 %), and Trypanosoma (60.0 vs. 2.3 %). Altogether, five haemosporidian lineages were detected by cytochrome b sequencing. Two broadly distributed and host nonspecific lineages, Plasmodium (TURDUS1) and Leucocytozoon (BT2), were detected only sporadically, while three newly described northern goshawk host-specific Leucocytozoon lineages (ACGE01-03) represent the absolute majority of the haemosporidians identified by molecular methods. Our findings support evidences that in falconiform birds the Leucocytozoon toddi group is formed by several host-specific clusters, with Leucocytozoon buteonis in buzzards and Leucocytozoon mathisi in hawks. Between-year comparisons revealed that the infection status of adults remained predominantly unchanged and individuals stayed uninfected or possessed the same parasite lineages; however, two gains and one loss of blood parasite taxa were also recorded.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Syst Parasitol. 2014 Feb;87(2):135-51 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2006 Apr;92(2):375-9 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2002 Oct;88(5):972-8 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2007 Aug;93(4):889-96 PubMed

Evolution. 2012 Mar;66(3):740-51 PubMed

Parasit Vectors. 2015 Mar 31;8:189 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2015 Feb;114(2):551-60 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2013 Apr;112(4):1667-77 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2008 Jun;94(3):709-15 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2009 Apr;104(5):1061-77 PubMed

Parasitol Res. 2013 Feb;112(2):839-45 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2010 Feb;96(1):170-7 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 31;8(12):e81607 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2009 Oct;95(5):1171-6 PubMed

Folia Parasitol (Praha). 1981;28(4):303-12 PubMed

Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Apr;47(1):261-73 PubMed

J Evol Biol. 2008 Jul;21(4):979-87 PubMed

Int J Parasitol. 2014 Apr;44(5):329-38 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2014 Jul;23 (13):3322-9 PubMed

J Parasitol. 2004 Aug;90(4):797-802 PubMed

Mol Ecol. 2015 Mar;24(6):1355-63 PubMed

Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Sep;9(5):1353-8 PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...