Enzymatic activity and catalytic hydrogen evolution in reduced and oxidized urease at mercury surfaces
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
23856228
DOI
10.1016/j.aca.2013.06.014
PII: S0003-2670(13)00837-4
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Constant-current chronopotentiometric stripping, Mercury containing electrodes, Protein denaturation at negatively charged surfaces, Protein structure at surfaces, Thiol-modified electrodes, Urease enzymatic activity,
- MeSH
- Adsorption MeSH
- Cysteine chemistry MeSH
- Protein Denaturation MeSH
- Disulfides chemistry MeSH
- Dithiothreitol chemistry MeSH
- Electrochemical Techniques MeSH
- Electrodes MeSH
- Catalysis MeSH
- Oxidation-Reduction MeSH
- Surface Properties MeSH
- Mercury chemistry MeSH
- Protein Folding MeSH
- Sulfhydryl Compounds chemistry MeSH
- Temperature MeSH
- Urease chemistry metabolism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Cysteine MeSH
- Disulfides MeSH
- Dithiothreitol MeSH
- Mercury MeSH
- Sulfhydryl Compounds MeSH
- Urease MeSH
It was originally shown [10] that urease retains its enzymatic activity when adsorbed at bare mercury and solid amalgam surfaces. However the opinion later prevailed that, when adsorbed at bare metal electrodes, proteins are irreversibly denatured. Here we confirm that urease is enzymatically active at a bare solid amalgam surface as found by Santhanam et al., and we show that this enzyme is equally active at a thiol-modified amalgam surface. We also show that it is the reduced form of urease, which is enzymatically active at Hg surfaces. Oxidation of the protein, resulting in formation of disulfide bonds, strongly decreases the enzyme activity. Using constant current chronopotentiometric stripping (CPS) we show that the exposure of surface-attached urease to negative potentials results in the protein unfolding. The extent of the unfolding depends upon the amount of time for which the protein is exposed to negative potentials, and at very short times this unfolding can be avoided. At thiol-modified Hg surfaces the protein is less vulnerable to the effects of the electric field. We conclude that the loss of enzymatic activity, resulting from a 10 min exposure of the protein to -0.58 V, is not due to reduction of the disulfide bonds as suggested by Santhanam et al. This loss is probably a result of protein reorientation, due to reduction of the Hg-S bonds (formed by accessible cysteines), followed by prolonged electric field effect on the surface-attached protein.
References provided by Crossref.org