Measurement of body condition in a common carabid beetle, Poecilus cupreus: a comparison of fresh weight, dry weight, and fat content
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
23879296
PubMed Central
PMC3735054
DOI
10.1673/031.013.0601
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- brouci chemie fyziologie MeSH
- tělesná hmotnost * MeSH
- tuková tkáň MeSH
- tuky analýza MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- tuky MeSH
Because of its direct consequences on reproductive success, body condition is an often-studied individual trait in insects. Various studies on insects use disparate methods to assess "body condition." However, it is doubtful that the results obtained by disparate methods are comparable. In this study, the body conditions of Poecilus cupreus (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from eight sites were compared based on the following commonly used variables: (i) fresh weight, (ii) dry weight, and (iii) fat content. All of these variables were corrected for structural body size. Moreover, the effects of using the following ways of assessing structural body size were examined: (a) one size measurement (length of elytron, which is commonly used in beetles), and (b) three size measurements (length of elytron, width of pronotum and length of hind femur). The results obtained using the various estimations of body condition (i, ii, iii) varied significantly. Therefore, studies employing distinct body measurements to assess body condition are not comparable to each other. Using multiple structural size measurements in body condition analyses is better than the common practice of using only one size measurement. However, in the present study, results provided by both methods differ only slightly. A recommendation on the use of terminology in studies on body condition is introduced.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Arrese EL, Soulages JL. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annual Review of Entomology. 2010;55:207–225. PubMed PMC
Barone M, Frank T. Habitat age increases reproduction and nutritional condition in a generalist arthropod predator. Oecologia. 2003;135:78–83. PubMed
Bennett VA, Sformo T, Walters K, Toien O, Jeannet K, Hochstrasser R, Pan QF, Serianni AS, Barnes BM, Duman JG. Comparative overwintering physiology of Alaska and Indiana populations of the beetle Cucujus clavipes (Fabricius): roles of antifreeze proteins, polyols, dehydration and diapause. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2005;208:4467–4477. PubMed
Blanckenhorn WU, Hosken DJ. Heritability of three condition surrogates in the yellow dung fly. Behavioral Ecology. 2003;14:612–618.
Block W, Convey P. Seasonal and longterm variation in body-water content of an Antarctic springtail - a response to climate change? Polar Biology. 2001;24:764–770.
Bommarco R. Reproduction and energy reserves of a predatory carabid beetle relative to agroecosystem complexity. Ecological Applications. 1998a;8:846–853.
Bommarco R. Stage sensitivity to food limitation for a generalist arthropod predator, Pterostichus cupreus (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Environmental Entomology. 1998b;27:863–869.
Chaabane K, Loreau M, Josens G. Growth and egg production in Abax ater (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Pedobiologia. 1997;41:385–396.
Cloudsley-Thompson JL. Thermal and water relations of desert beetles. Naturwissenschaften. 2001;88:447–460. PubMed
Colinet H, Hance T, Vernon P. Water relations, fat reserves, survival, and longevity of a cold-exposed parasitic wasp Aphidius colemani (Hymenoptera: Aphidiinae). Environmental Entomology. 2006;35:228–236.
Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Current Biology. 2006;16:R755–R765. PubMed
Forsythe TG. Locomotion in ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae): an interpretation of leg structure in functional terms. Journal of Zoology. 1983;200:493–507.
Frank T, Kehrli P, Germann C. Density and nutritional condition of carabid beetles in wildflower areas of different age. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2007;120:377–383.
Freckleton RP. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2002;71:542–545.
Garcia-Berthou E. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: testing regression residuals vs. the analysis of covariance. Journal of Animal Ecology. 2001;70:708–711.
Giglio A, Brandmayr P, Dalpozzo R, Sindona G, Tagarelli A, Talarico F, Zetto T, Ferrero E. The defensive secretion of Carabus lefebvrei Dejean 1826 pupa (Coleoptera, Carabidae): gland ultrastructure and chemical identification. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2009;72:351–361. PubMed
AJ Green. Mass/length residuals: Measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology. 2001;82:1473–1483.
Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal. 2008;50:346–363. PubMed
Hurka A. Carabidae of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Carabidae České a Slovenské republiky. Kabourek: 1996.
Jakob EM, Marshall SD, Uetz GW. Estimating fitness: A comparison of body condition indices. Oikos. 1996;77:61–67.
Knapp M. Preservative fluid and storage conditions alter body mass estimation in a terrestrial insect. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2012;143:185–190.
Kumano N, Kuriwada T, Shiromoto K, Haraguchi D, Kohama T. Effect of body size and sex ratio on male alternative mating tactics of the West Indian sweetpotato weevil, Euscepes postfasciatus. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 2010;135:154–161.
Lease H, Wolf B. Lipid content of terrestrial arthropods in relation to body size, phylogeny, ontogeny and sex. Physiological Entomology. 2011;36:29–35.
Lövei GL, Sunderland KD. The ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annual Review of Entomology. 1996;41:241–256. PubMed
Moya-Larano J. Senescence and food limitation in a slowly ageing spider. Functional Ecology. 2002;16:734–741.
Moya-Larano J, Macias-Ordonez R, Blanckenhorn WU, Fernandez-Montraveta C. Analysing body condition: mass, volume or density? Journal of Animal Ecology. 2008;77:1099–1108. PubMed
Nedved O, Windsor D. Supercooling ability, fat and water contents in a diapausing tropical beetle, Stenotarsus rotundus (Coleoptera, Endomychidae). European Journal of Entomology. 1994;91:307–312.
Öberg S. Influence of landscape structure and farming practice on body condition and fecundity of wolf spiders. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2009;10:614–621.
Östman O. Asynchronous temporal variation among sites in condition of two carabid species. Ecological Entomology. 2005;30:63–69.
Peig J, Green AJ. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos. 2009;118:1883–1891.
Petersen MK. Capacity of Bembidion lampros and Tachyporus hypnorum to survive periods of starvation in early spring. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 1999;90:207–214.
R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. 2010. Available online: http://www.R-project.org.
Rolff J, Joop G. Estimating condition: pitfalls of using weight as a fitness correlate. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 2002;4:931–935.
Thiele HU. Carabid Beetles in Their Environments. Springer-Verlag: 1977.
Wallin H. Habitat choice of some fieldinhabiting carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) studied by recapture of marked individuals. Ecological Entomology. 1986;11:457–466.