Blood pressure changes after renal denervation at 10 European expert centers
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
294713
European Research Council - International
PubMed
24067345
PubMed Central
PMC3932403
DOI
10.1038/jhh.2013.88
PII: jhh201388
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory MeSH
- Antihypertensive Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Denervation * MeSH
- Essential Hypertension MeSH
- Hypertension drug therapy surgery MeSH
- Combined Modality Therapy MeSH
- Kidney innervation MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Antihypertensive Agents MeSH
We did a subject-level meta-analysis of the changes (Δ) in blood pressure (BP) observed 3 and 6 months after renal denervation (RDN) at 10 European centers. Recruited patients (n=109; 46.8% women; mean age 58.2 years) had essential hypertension confirmed by ambulatory BP. From baseline to 6 months, treatment score declined slightly from 4.7 to 4.4 drugs per day. Systolic/diastolic BP fell by 17.6/7.1 mm Hg for office BP, and by 5.9/3.5, 6.2/3.4, and 4.4/2.5 mm Hg for 24-h, daytime and nighttime BP (P0.03 for all). In 47 patients with 3- and 6-month ambulatory measurements, systolic BP did not change between these two time points (P0.08). Normalization was a systolic BP of <140 mm Hg on office measurement or <130 mm Hg on 24-h monitoring and improvement was a fall of 10 mm Hg, irrespective of measurement technique. For office BP, at 6 months, normalization, improvement or no decrease occurred in 22.9, 59.6 and 22.9% of patients, respectively; for 24-h BP, these proportions were 14.7, 31.2 and 34.9%, respectively. Higher baseline BP predicted greater BP fall at follow-up; higher baseline serum creatinine was associated with lower probability of improvement of 24-h BP (odds ratio for 20-μmol l(-1) increase, 0.60; P=0.05) and higher probability of experiencing no BP decrease (OR, 1.66; P=0.01). In conclusion, BP responses to RDN include regression-to-the-mean and remain to be consolidated in randomized trials based on ambulatory BP monitoring. For now, RDN should remain the last resort in patients in whom all other ways to control BP failed, and it must be cautiously used in patients with renal impairment.
3rd Department of Internal Medicine General Faculty Hospital Prague Czech Republic
BHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
Department of Cardiology Isala Klinieken Zwolle The Netherlands
Department of Cardiology Sahlgrenska University Hospital Gothenburg Sweden
Department of Cardiology Ullevål University Hospital University of Oslo Oslo Norway
Faculté de Médecine Université Paris Descartes Paris France
Hypertension Unit Geneva University Hospital Geneva Switzerland
Service of Nephrology Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne Switzerland
See more in PubMed
Staessen JA, Kuznetsova T, Stolarz K. Hypertension prevalence and stroke mortality across populations. JAMA. 2003;289:2420–2422. PubMed
Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, Sobotka PA, Sadowski J, Bartus K, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet. 2009;373:1275–1281. PubMed
Esler MD, Krum H, Sobotka PA, Schlaich MP, Schmieder RE, Böhm M, Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1903–1909. PubMed
Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension. Durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011;57:911–917. PubMed
Azizi M, Steichen O, Frank M, Bobrie G, Plouin PF, Sapoval M. Catheter-based radiofrequency renal ablation in patients with resistant hypertension. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43:293–299. PubMed
Persu A, Renkin J, Thijs L, Staessen JA. Renal denervation — Ultima ratio or standard in treatment-resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2012;60:596–606. PubMed PMC
Persu A, Renkin J, Asayama K, O'Brien E, Staessen JA. Renal denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension: the need for restraint and more and better evidence. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013;11:739–749. PubMed
Stamatakis E, Weiler R, Ioannidis JPA. Undue industry influences that distort healtcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice: a review. Eur J Clin Invest. 2013;43:469–475. PubMed
Staessen JA, Fagard R, Thijs L, Celis H, Arabidze GG, Birkenhäger WH, et al. Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Lancet. 1997;350:757–764. PubMed
Staessen J, Amery A, Fagard R. Editorial review. Isolated systolic hypertension in the elderly. J Hypertens. 1990;8:393–405. PubMed
Pisoni R, Ahmed MI, Calhoun DA. Characterization and treatment of resitant hypertension. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2009;11:407–413. PubMed PMC
Schmieder RE, Redon J, Grassi G, Kjeldsen JE, Mancia G, Narkiewicz K, et al. ESH position paper: renal denervation – an interventional therapy of resistant hypertension. J Hypertens. 2012;30:387–841. PubMed
Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470. PubMed
Pathak A, Girerd X, Azizi M, Benamer H, Halimi JM, Lantelme P, et al. Expert consensus: Renal denervation for the treatment of hypertension. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012;93:386–394. PubMed
Staessen JA, Thijs L, Clement D, Davidson C, Fagard R, Lehtonen A, et al. Ambulatory pressure decreases in long-term placebo treatment in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertens. 1994;12:1035–1039. PubMed
O'Brien E, Mee F, Tan S, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Training and assessment of observers for blood pressure measurement in hypertension research. J Hum Hypertens. 1991;5:7–10. PubMed
O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K. Technical aspects of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the elderly. Cardiol Elderly. 1993;1:464–469.
O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mancia G, Mengden T, et al. Practice guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2005;23:697–701. PubMed
Fagard R, Brguljan J, Thijs L, Staessen J. Prediction of the actual awake and asleep blood pressures by various methods of 24 h pressure analysis. J Hypertens. 1996;14:557–563. PubMed
Davis MI, Filion KB, Zhang D, Eisenberg MJ, Afilalo J, Schiffrin EL, et al. Effectiveness of renal denervation therapy for resistant hypertension: a systematic reveiw and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:231–241. PubMed
Brinkmann J, Heusser K, Schmidt BM, Menne J, Klein G, Bauersachs J, et al. Catheter-based renal nerve ablation and centrally generated sympathetic activity in difficult-to-control hypertensive patients: prospective case series. Hypertension. 2012;60:1485–1490. PubMed
Witkowski A, Prejbisz A, Florczak E, Kadziela J, Sliwinsky P, Bielen P, et al. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on blood pressure, sleep apnea course, and glycemic control in patients with resistant hypertension and sleep apnea. Hypertension. 2011;58:559–565. PubMed
Hering D, Mahfoud F, Walton AS, Krum H, Lambert GW, Lambert EA, et al. Renal denervation in moderate to severe CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1250–1257. PubMed PMC
Zuern CS, Rizas KD, Eick C, Stoleriu C, Bunk L, Barthel P, et al. Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on 24-hour blood pressure variability. Front Physiol. 2012;3:1–8. PubMed PMC
Fadl-Elmula FE, Hoffmann P, Fossum E, Brekke M, Gjønnæss E, Hjørnholm U, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in patients with treatment resistant hypertension following witnessed intake of medication prior to qualifying ambulatory blood pressure. Hypertension. 2013;62:526–532. PubMed
Verloop WL, Vink EE, Voskuil M, Vonken EJ, Rookmaker MB, Bots ML, et al. Eligibility for percutaneous renal denervation: the importance of a systematic screening. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1662–1668. PubMed
Staessen JA, Thijs L, Bijttebier G, Clement D, O'Brien ET, Palatini P, et al. Determining the trough-to-peak ratio in parallel-group trials. Hypertension. 1997;29:659–667. PubMed
Staessen JA, Byttebier G, Buntinx F, Celis H, O'Brien ET, Fagard R, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1997;278:1065–1072. PubMed
Staessen JA, Den Hond E, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Vandenhoven G, et al. Antihypertensive treatment based on blood pressure measurement at home or in the physician's office. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;291:955–964. PubMed
Mancia G, Parati G. Office compared with ambulatory blood pressure in assessing response to antihypertensive treatment: a meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2004;22:435–445. PubMed
Staessen JA, Thijs L, Fagard R, O'Brien ET, Clement D, de Leeuw PW, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional and ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. JAMA. 1999;282:539–546. PubMed
Salles GF, Cardoso CR, Muxfeldt ES. Prognostic influence of office and ambulatory blood pressures in resistant hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2340–2346. PubMed
Hansen TW, Kikuya M, Thijs L, Björklund-Bodegård K, Kuznetsova T, Ohkubo T, et al. Prognostic superiority of daytime ambulatory over conventional blood pressure in four populatios: a meta-analasis of 7030 individuals. J Hypertens. 2007;25:1554–1564. PubMed
Boggia J, Thijs L, Hansen TW, Li Y, Kikuya M, Björklund-Bodegård K, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 9357 subjects from 11 populations highlights missed opportunities for cardiovascular prevention in women. Hypertension. 2011;57:397–405. PubMed PMC
Doumas M, Anyfanti P, Bakris G. Should ambulatory blood pressure monitoring be mandatory for future studies in resistant hypertension: a perspective. J Hypertens. 2012;30:874–876. PubMed
Tsioufis C, Kordalis A, Flessas D, Anastasopoulos I, Tsiachris D, Papademetriou V, et al. Pathophysiology of resistant hypertension: role of the sympathetic nervous system. Int J Hypertens. 2011;20:642416. PubMed PMC
Kandzari DE, Bhatt DL, Sobotka PA, O'Neill WW, Esler M, Flack JM, et al. Catheter-based renal denervation for resistant hypertension: rational and design of the SYMPLICITY HTN-3 trial. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35:528–535. PubMed PMC
Chinushi M, Izumi D, Iijima K, Suzuki K, Furushima H, Saitoh O, et al. Blood pressure and autonomic responses to electrical stimulation of the renal arterial nerves before and after ablation of the renal artery. Hypertension. 2013;61:450–456. PubMed
Savard S, Frank M, Bobrie G, Plouin PF, Sapoval M, Azizi M. Eligibility for renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension: when enthusiasm meets reality in real-life patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2422–2424. PubMed
Vonend O, Antoch G, Rump LC, Blondin D. Secondary rise in blood pressure after renal denervation. Lancet. 2012;380:778. PubMed
Kaltenbach B, Id D, Franke JC, Sievert H, Hennersdorf M, Maier J, et al. Renal artery stenosis after renal sympathetic denervation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2694–2695. PubMed
Templin C, Jaguszewski M, Ghadri JR, Sudano I, Gaehwiler R, Hellermann JP, et al. Vascular lesions induced by renal nerve ablation as assessed by optical coherence tomography: pre-and post-procedural comparison with the Simplicity catheter system and the EnligHTN™ multi-electrode renal denervation catheter. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2141–2148. PubMed PMC