CA125 and HE4 levels in a Czech female population diagnosed with endometrial cancer in preoperative management
Jazyk angličtina Země Řecko Médium print
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24403483
PII: 34/1/327
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CA125, Endometrial cancer, HE4, tumor markers,
- MeSH
- antigen CA-125 krev MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- invazivní růst nádoru MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery krev MeSH
- nádory endometria krev diagnóza chirurgie MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- pilotní projekty MeSH
- předoperační péče MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- protein WFDC2 MeSH
- proteiny metabolismus MeSH
- ROC křivka MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- studie případů a kontrol MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antigen CA-125 MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
- protein WFDC2 MeSH
- proteiny MeSH
- WFDC2 protein, human MeSH Prohlížeč
AIM: The aim of the present study was to compare the use of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) biomarkers in patients with endometrial cancer for preoperative management and to particularly focus on relationship between CA125 and HE4 and disease stage in predicting myometrial invasion or intrauterine tumor spread. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and 32 healthy controls were enrolled into the pilot study in the period between May 2012 and March 2013. Blood from all the females was collected and examined for CA125 and HE4. Based on standardized ultrasound examination, including gynecological examination, the clinical disease stage was determined. RESULTS: We found a significant difference (p<0.0001) for means of serum levels of HE4: females with endometrial cancer, 75.5 pmol/l, versus healthy females, 40.0 pmol/l. A non-significant statistical difference was found for mean serum CA125 levels (p=0.4442): females with endometrial cancer 19.0 IU/l, versus healthy females, 15 IU/l. A significant correlation with histopathological disease stage was found for both biomarkers (Spearman correlation). Sensitivity and specificity, and the related cut-off for HE4 suggest that HE4 would be a more appropriate biomarker for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant states. CONCLUSION: Based on our pilot study, we found that parallel examination of HE4 and CA125 may support endometrial ultrasound finding verification prior to biopsy. This study is ongoing and we expect that results on a larger population may enable HE4 measurement to be implemented in routine practice.