The atrial fibrillation ablation pilot study: a European Survey on Methodology and results of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation conducted by the European Heart Rhythm Association
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, pozorovací studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24487524
DOI
10.1093/eurheartj/ehu001
PII: ehu001
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Atrial fibrillation, Catheter ablation, Outcomes, Registry, Survey,
- MeSH
- antiarytmika terapeutické užití MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- fibrilace síní diagnóza mortalita chirurgie MeSH
- Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
- katetrizační ablace metody mortalita MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pilotní projekty MeSH
- pooperační péče metody mortalita MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- znovupřijetí pacienta statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- pozorovací studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antiarytmika MeSH
AIMS: The Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Pilot Study is a prospective registry designed to describe the clinical epidemiology of patients undergoing an atrial fibrillation (AFib) ablation, and the diagnostic/therapeutic processes applied across Europe. The aims of the 1-year follow-up were to analyse how centres assess in routine clinical practice the success of the procedure and to evaluate the success rate and long-term safety/complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-two centres in 10 European countries were asked to enrol 20 consecutive patients undergoing a first AFib ablation procedure. A web-based case report form captured information on pre-procedural, procedural, and 1-year follow-up data. Between October 2010 and May 2011, 1410 patients were included and 1391 underwent an AFib ablation (98.7%). A total of 1300 patients (93.5%) completed a follow-up control 367 ± 42 days after the procedure. Arrhythmia documentation was done by an electrocardiogram in 76%, Holter-monitoring in 52%, transtelephonic monitoring in 8%, and/or implanted systems in 4.5%. Over 50% became asymptomatic. Twenty-one per cent were re-admitted due to post-ablation arrhythmias. Success without antiarrhythmic drugs was achieved in 40.7% of patients (43.7% in paroxysmal AF; 30.2% in persistent AF; 36.7% in long-lasting persistent AF). A second ablation was required in 18% of the cases and 43.4% were under antiarrhythmic treatment. Thirty-three patients (2.5%) suffered an adverse event, 272 (21%) experienced a left atrial tachycardia, and 4 patients died (1 haemorrhagic stroke, 1 ventricular fibrillation in a patient with ischaemic heart disease, 1 cancer, and 1 of unknown cause). CONCLUSION: The AFib Ablation Pilot Study provided crucial information on the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of catheter ablation of AFib in a real-world setting. The methods used to assess the success of the procedure appeared at least suboptimal. Even in this context, the 12-month success rate appears to be somewhat lower to the one reported clinical trials.
AF Study Group Department of Cardiology Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
Cliniques du Sud Luxembourg Vivalia Arlon Belgium
Department of Cardiology Heraklion University Hospital Crete Greece
Department of Cardiology Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Department of Cardiology Isar Heart Centre Muenchen Germany
Department of Cardiology Leiden University Medical Centre Leiden The Netherlands
Department of Cardiology Silesian Academy of Medicine Zabrze Poland
EURObservational Research Programme European Society of Cardiology Sophia Antipolis France
GVM Care and Research E S Health Science Foundation Maria Cecilia Hospital Cotignola Italy
Heart Center University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany
Henry Dunant Hospital Errikos Dynan Hospital Athens Greece
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque Bordeaux Pessac France
Hospital Clinico San Carlos Madrid Spain
Internal Cardiology Department Faculty Hospital Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
Ospedale Maggiore Di Crema Crema Italy
Service De Cardiologie Hôpital Charles Nicolle Rouen Cedex France
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org