Comparison of glucose variability assessed by a continuous glucose-monitoring system in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus switched from NPH insulin to insulin glargine: the COBIN2 study
Language English Country Austria Media print-electronic
Document type Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 blood diagnosis drug therapy MeSH
- Insulin, Long-Acting administration & dosage MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hypoglycemic Agents administration & dosage MeSH
- Insulin Glargine MeSH
- Blood Glucose analysis MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Drug Monitoring methods MeSH
- Drug Substitution MeSH
- Insulin, Isophane administration & dosage MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Controlled Clinical Trial MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Insulin, Long-Acting MeSH
- Hypoglycemic Agents MeSH
- Insulin Glargine MeSH
- Blood Glucose MeSH
- Insulin, Isophane MeSH
BACKGROUND: Glucose variability combined with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) assessments more reliably represents the level of glycemic control. The study was aimed to compare blood glucose variability with insulin glargine vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a continuous glucose-monitoring system (CGMS), in patients treated with basal insulin using stable dose of oral antidiabetic agents and HbA1c in the range of 4.5-8.0 % International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) units. [6.2-9.4 % Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) units]. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients (N = 116) treated for ≥ 2 months with NPH and metformin combined with sulfonylurea or glinide. Glucose variability was measured after a 4-week NPH treatment phase and after a subsequent 12-week glargine treatment phase using CGMS. Based on 72-hour CGMS, glucose variability was assessed by area under the curve [AUC (mmol/L · h)]. Differences (glargine-NPH) in AUC within 24 h in the glucose ranges of ≤ 3.3, ≤ 3.9, 7.5-3.9 (margins excluding), ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L were evaluated. Circadian fluctuation of glucose was assessed by M-value (log-transformation of the deviation from an arbitrary standard). RESULTS: AUCs of glucose in the lowest ranges (≤ 3.3 and ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) did not change significantly after treatment with glargine. Those in the higher ranges (≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L) were significantly lower (p < 0.001 for all ranges), whereas AUC of glucose in the normal range (3.9-7.5 mmol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) at the end of glargine treatment phase. Circadian fluctuation of glucose assessed by M-value showed a significant decrease after glargine treatment (p < 0.003). No significant differences in hypoglycemia confirmed by glucose value ≤ 3.3 mmol/L were found between treatment phases. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00659477. CONCLUSIONS: As monitored by CGMS, switching from NPH to glargine with active titration shifted glucose from abnormally high to normal levels with reduced fluctuation and without increased risk of hypoglycemia.
See more in PubMed
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009 Jul;25(5):393-402 PubMed
Diabetes. 2003 Nov;52(11):2795-804 PubMed
Am Heart J. 2006 Jul;152(1):27-38 PubMed
Diabetes Care. 2000 Aug;23(8):1130-6 PubMed
Diabetes Care. 2000 Jun;23(6):813-9 PubMed
Vasc Med. 2005 Aug;10(3):191-8 PubMed
Diabetes Care. 2008 Jun;31(6):1160-4 PubMed
Diabetes. 2000 Dec;49(12):2142-8 PubMed
Diabetologia. 1996 Dec;39(12):1577-83 PubMed
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53 PubMed
Diabet Med. 2010 Aug;27(8):872-8 PubMed
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 May;17 Suppl 1:S15-9 PubMed
J Lab Clin Med. 2003 Apr;141(4):242-9 PubMed
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008 Jul-Aug;24(5):353-63 PubMed
J Diabetes Complications. 2005 May-Jun;19(3):178-81 PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT00659477