We studied the appearance of broadband oscillatory changes (ranging 2-45 Hz) induced by a cognitive task with two levels of complexity. The event-related de/synchronizations (ERD/S) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) were evaluated in an executive function test. Four epilepsy surgery candidates with intracerebral electrodes implanted in the ACC and three Parkinson's disease patients with externalized deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted in the STN participated in the study. A Flanker test (FT) with visual stimuli (arrows) was performed. Subjects reacted to four types of stimuli presented on the monitor by pushing the right or left button: congruent arrows to the right or left side (simple task) and incongruent arrows to the right or left side (more difficult complex task). We explored the activation of STN and the activation of the ACC while processing the FT. Both conditions, i.e. congruent and incongruent, induced oscillatory changes in the ACC and also STN with significantly higher activation during incongruent trial. At variance with the ACC, in the STN not only the ERD beta but also the ERD alpha activity was significantly more activated by the incongruent condition. In line with our earlier studies, the STN appears to be involved in activities linked with increased cognitive load. The specificity and complexity of task-related activation of the STN might indicate the involvement of the STN in processes controlling human behaviour, e.g. in the selection and inhibition of competing alternatives.

Department of Child Neurology University Hospital Medical School of Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Feb;28(1):30-5 PubMed

Ann Neurol. 2009 Dec;66(6):817-24 PubMed

Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 05;2:204 PubMed

Psychophysiology. 1996 May;33(3):282-94 PubMed

Psychophysiology. 2001 Sep;38(5):752-60 PubMed

Brain. 1998 Jan;121 ( Pt 1):167-77 PubMed

J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13396-401 PubMed

J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15815-26 PubMed

Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Jul;114(7):1226-36 PubMed

Annu Rev Neurosci. 1986;9:357-81 PubMed

Int J Psychophysiol. 2003 Jan;47(1):65-74 PubMed

J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):120-31 PubMed

J Neurosci. 2003 May 15;23(10):4308-14 PubMed

Psychophysiology. 2001 Jan;38(1):143-52 PubMed

Hum Brain Mapp. 2005 Oct;26(2):148-55 PubMed

Neurology. 2009 Jan 6;72(1):42-9 PubMed

J Neurosci. 2011 Jan 19;31(3):878-82 PubMed

Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1257-60 PubMed

Brain. 2011 Jan;134(Pt 1):36-49 PubMed

Brain. 2012 Dec;135(Pt 12):3721-34 PubMed

Mov Disord. 2008 Mar 15;23(4):553-7 PubMed

J Neurol Sci. 2011 Nov 15;310(1-2):96-9 PubMed

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011 Aug;118(8):1235-45 PubMed

Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):215-222 PubMed

Neurology. 2005 Sep 13;65(5):707-13 PubMed

Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Dec;8(12):539-46 PubMed

J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2006 Oct;113(10):1449-62 PubMed

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Mar;37(3):358-73 PubMed

Neuroscience. 2009 Jul 21;161(4):1027-36 PubMed

Neuroscience. 2011 Dec 15;198:193-204 PubMed

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2009 Dec;15 Suppl 3:S83-6 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 19;104(25):10661-6 PubMed

Trends Neurosci. 2011 Dec;34(12):611-8 PubMed

Exp Brain Res. 2010 Jun;203(2):317-27 PubMed