Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
24664277
DOI
10.1161/circulationaha.113.006987
PII: CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- cardiac, pacemaker,
- MeSH
- design vybavení * MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- kardiostimulátor * MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- pooperační komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srdeční arytmie terapie MeSH
- studie proveditelnosti MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Conventional cardiac pacemakers are associated with several potential short- and long-term complications related to either the transvenous lead or subcutaneous pulse generator. We tested the safety and clinical performance of a novel, completely self-contained leadless cardiac pacemaker. METHODS AND RESULTS: The primary safety end point was freedom from complications at 90 days. Secondary performance end points included implant success rate, implant time, and measures of device performance (pacing/sensing thresholds and rate-responsive performance). The mean age of the patient cohort (n=33) was 77±8 years, and 67% of the patients were male (n=22/33). The most common indication for cardiac pacing was permanent atrial fibrillation with atrioventricular block (n=22, 67%). The implant success rate was 97% (n=32). Five patients (15%) required the use of >1 leadless cardiac pacemaker during the procedure. One patient developed right ventricular perforation and cardiac tamponade during the implant procedure, and eventually died as the result of a stroke. The overall complication-free rate was 94% (31/33). After 3 months of follow-up, the measures of pacing performance (sensing, impedance, and pacing threshold) either improved or were stable within the accepted range. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective nonrandomized study, a completely self-contained, single-chamber leadless cardiac pacemaker has shown to be safe and feasible. The absence of a transvenous lead and subcutaneous pulse generator could represent a paradigm shift in cardiac pacing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01700244.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
European experience with a first totally leadless cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker system
The learning curve associated with the implantation of the Nanostim leadless pacemaker
Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Pacing Paradigm Change
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01700244