• This record comes from PubMed

Dual-phase dual-energy CT in patients with lung cancer: assessment of the additional value of iodine quantification in lymph node therapy response

. 2014 Aug ; 24 (8) : 1981-8. [epub] 20140604

Language English Country Germany Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the potential contribution of iodine uptake calculation from dual-phase dual-energy CT (DE-CT) for lymph node staging and therapy response monitoring in lung cancer patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 27 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), who underwent dual-phase DE-CT before and after chemotherapy, was performed. Iodine uptake (mg/mL) and total iodine uptake (mg) were calculated using prototype software in the early (arterial) and late (venous) post-contrast circulatory phase in 110 mediastinal lymph nodes. The arterial enhancement fraction (AEF) was calculated and compared with lymph node size and response to chemotherapy. RESULTS: A significant difference of AEF was observed between enlarged (90.4%; 32.3-238.5%) and non-enlarged (72.7%; -37.5-237.5%) lymph nodes (p = 0.044) before treatment onset. A significantly different change of AEF in responding (decrease of 26.3%; p = 0.022) and non-responding (increase of 43.0%; p = 0.031) lymph nodes was demonstrated. A higher value of AEF before treatment was observed in lymph nodes with subsequent favourable response (88.6% vs. 77.7%; p = 0.122), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The dual-phase DE-CT examination with quantification of ratio of early and late post-contrast iodine uptake is a feasible and promising method for the functional evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes including therapy response assessment. KEY POINTS: • Dual-phase DE-CT is beneficial for mediastinal lymph node assessment in NSCLC. • Arterial to venous iodine uptake ratio was higher in enlarged lymph nodes. • Change of arterial enhancement fraction correlated to therapy response.

See more in PubMed

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Jan;33(1):22-8 PubMed

Cancer Biol Ther. 2010 Jan;9(1):15-9 PubMed

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jul;199(1):W54-64 PubMed

Korean J Radiol. 2012 Nov-Dec;13(6):702-10 PubMed

J Nucl Med. 2012 Apr;53(4):521-9 PubMed

Cancer Imaging. 2013 Jul 22;13(3):306-13 PubMed

Eur Radiol. 2013 Aug;23(8):2127-36 PubMed

Eur J Radiol. 2011 Dec;80(3):e278-83 PubMed

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):1766-75 PubMed

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):e398-405 PubMed

Radiology. 2009 Feb;250(2):425-434 PubMed

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Jan;30(1):78-84 PubMed

Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):532-9 PubMed

Histopathology. 2001 May;38(5):466-70 PubMed

Chest. 2007 Jul;132(1):193-9 PubMed

Eur Radiol. 2007 Jan;17(1):23-32 PubMed

J Thorac Imaging. 2009 May;24(2):152-9 PubMed

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):318-25 PubMed

Eur Radiol. 2012 Jan;22(1):93-103 PubMed

Radiology. 1997 Oct;205(1):49-53 PubMed

Cancer Imaging. 2012 Jun 29;12:187-93 PubMed

Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):1456-67 PubMed

Br J Radiol. 2012 May;85(1013):606-12 PubMed

Eur Radiol. 2014 Mar;24(3):574-80 PubMed

J Cell Biochem. 2014 Mar;115(3):457-63 PubMed

J Thorac Dis. 2013 Oct;5 Suppl 5:S579-92 PubMed

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan;200(1):8-19 PubMed

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...