The impact of growth conditions on biofilm formation and the cell surface hydrophobicity in fluconazole susceptible and tolerant Candida albicans
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- antifungální látky farmakologie MeSH
- biofilmy účinky léků MeSH
- Candida albicans chemie účinky léků růst a vývoj metabolismus MeSH
- flukonazol farmakologie MeSH
- glukosa metabolismus MeSH
- hydrofobní a hydrofilní interakce MeSH
- kultivační média chemie metabolismus MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- povrchové vlastnosti účinky léků MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antifungální látky MeSH
- flukonazol MeSH
- glukosa MeSH
- kultivační média MeSH
The influence of acidic (5.6) and neutral (7.0) pH and glucose concentrations (0.9 and 2 %) was determined in in vitro biofilm formation and the cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) in fluconazole (FLC) susceptible and tolerant yeasts of Candida albicans. The determination of biofilm viability using tetrazolium salt XTT showed that both FLC-tolerant C. albicans 1173 and FLC-sensitive C. albicans SC 5314 formed more robust biofilm in the YNB medium at pH 7.0 in the absence of FLC than that at acidic pH. Tested glucose concentrations did not show any direct effect on formation of biofilm under all conditions. However, determination of biofilm dry mass that contains also extracellular matrix suggested some effect of 2 % D-glucose. An increase in CSH (for about 10 %) was estimated in C. albicans SC 5314 in the presence of FLC, while the FLC-tolerant isolate proved a weak increase of CSH only in the YNB media containing 2 % D-glucose. Additionally, strain C. albicans SC 5314 strongly flocculated at neutral pH in the absence of FLC, but this phenomenon was not observed in the presence of FLC. Subinhibitory concentration of FLC influenced biofilm cells and CSH, but FLC susceptibility versus tolerance of C. albicans tested strains did not directly affect biofilm formation and/or CSH.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2008 Dec;57(Pt 12):1466-1472 PubMed
Eukaryot Cell. 2004 Apr;3(2):536-45 PubMed
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007 Jun;71(2):348-76 PubMed
Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Apr;14(4):1460-7 PubMed
Can J Microbiol. 2009 May;55(5):605-10 PubMed
Mycoses. 2010 May;53(3):221-6 PubMed
Mol Biol Cell. 2009 Nov;20(22):4845-55 PubMed
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33705 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1994 Mar;62(3):915-21 PubMed
Mycoses. 2010 Nov;53(6):475-80 PubMed
Can J Microbiol. 2008 Sep;54(9):718-24 PubMed
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004 Jul;2(7):533-40 PubMed
Mol Gen Genet. 1984;198(2):179-82 PubMed
Biol Pharm Bull. 2006 May;29(5):923-6 PubMed
Proteomics. 2004 Aug;4(8):2425-36 PubMed
Fungal Genet Biol. 2009 Feb;46(2):126-36 PubMed
FEMS Yeast Res. 2006 Nov;6(7):979-86 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2013 May;58(3):235-43 PubMed
Curr Microbiol. 2005 Aug;51(2):100-4 PubMed
Mol Biol Cell. 2008 Oct;19(10):4393-403 PubMed
Cell Microbiol. 2012 Sep;14(9):1319-35 PubMed
Eukaryot Cell. 2007 Oct;6(10):1736-44 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2007 Jul;56(Pt 7):1003-1004 PubMed
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32467 PubMed
Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2011 Mar;56(2):116-21 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 2012 Sep;158(Pt 9):2272-2282 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2011 Sep;60(Pt 9):1261-1269 PubMed
Nature. 2009 Jul 9;460(7252):220-4 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 2006 Apr;60(1):5-15 PubMed
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Jun;75(11):3663-72 PubMed
J Med Microbiol. 2008 Oct;57(Pt 10):1277-1281 PubMed
Curr Opin Microbiol. 1998 Dec;1(6):687-92 PubMed
J Dent. 2012 Aug;40(8):686-92 PubMed
Mycoses. 2009 Mar;52(2):118-28 PubMed
Infect Immun. 1985 Oct;50(1):97-101 PubMed
Pharmazie. 2004 Jul;59(7):573-4 PubMed
Eukaryot Cell. 2009 Sep;8(9):1314-20 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 2002 Dec;46(5):1345-51 PubMed
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Mar;59(3):441-50 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 2003 Feb;149(Pt 2):353-362 PubMed
Microbiology (Reading). 2007 Oct;153(Pt 10):3211-3217 PubMed
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000 Feb 1;183(1):89-94 PubMed
Mol Microbiol. 2008 May;68(3):535-7 PubMed
Eukaryot Cell. 2011 Oct;10(10):1370-4 PubMed
Fungal Genet Biol. 2008 Apr;45(4):485-97 PubMed
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39812 PubMed