Sex classification using the three-dimensional tibia form or shape including population specificity approach
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Historical Article, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- Keywords
- computed tomography-derived models, forensic science, geometric morphometrics, optical scanning, sexual dimorphism, tibia,
- MeSH
- Principal Component Analysis MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Discriminant Analysis MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Forensic Anthropology MeSH
- Tibia anatomy & histology diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Sex Determination by Skeleton methods MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional MeSH
- Check Tag
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Historical Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
The aims of this study were to enable geometric morphometric sex classification using tibial proximal and distal sexual dimorphism and to evaluate the secular trend of tibial shape/form from the early 20th century to the present day. The study samples consisted of 61 adult tibias from an early 20th-century Czech population and 57 three-dimensional tibias from a 21st-century population. Discriminant function analysis with cross-validation was carried out to assess the accuracy of sex classification. Shape analysis revealed significant sex differences in both tibial extremities of the 21st-century sample and in the proximal tibia of the 20th-century population. Sex-based divergence varied between the analyzed samples, raising the issues of population specificity and diachronic change. Classification using tibial form was more successful than using tibial shape. The highest values of correct assignment (91.80% and 88.52%) were found using the form from the early 20th Czech population.
References provided by Crossref.org
Disregarding population specificity: its influence on the sex assessment methods from the tibia