Echocardiographic assessment of global longitudinal right ventricular function in patients with an acute inferior ST elevation myocardial infarction and proximal right coronary artery occlusion
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Time Factors MeSH
- Echocardiography, Doppler * MeSH
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Right diagnostic imaging etiology pathology physiopathology MeSH
- Ventricular Function, Right * MeSH
- Hypotension etiology physiopathology MeSH
- Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction diagnostic imaging etiology pathology physiopathology MeSH
- Myocardial Contraction * MeSH
- Coronary Occlusion complications diagnostic imaging pathology physiopathology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging MeSH
- Myocardium pathology MeSH
- Recovery of Function MeSH
- Area Under Curve MeSH
- Predictive Value of Tests MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- ROC Curve MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Right ventricular (RV) myocardial infarction (MI) is a frequent concomitant of an acute inferior MI. We set out to determine the diagnostic value of speckle tracking echocardiography in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for RV stunning and scar prediction. 55 patients (66 ± 11 years) with an acute inferior ST elevation MI who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of an occlusion in the proximal right coronary artery were prospectively enrolled. An echocardiography was done on the day of presentation and on the 5th day thereafter. A CMR was subsequently performed 1 month after the MI. The CMR was used to differentiate between the group with RV scar (n = 26) and without RV scar (n = 29). RV peak systolic longitudinal strain (RV-LS) at presentation determined RV scar (-21.1 ± 5.1% vs. -9.9 ± 4.6%, p < 0.0001). The RV-LS correlated with the scar extent (r = 0.83, p < 0.0001). RV-LS > -15.8% had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 83% in RV scar prediction (AUC 0.93). RV-LS was superior to TAPSE and TDI in determining the presence of RV scar. According to RV-LS values at presentation and on the 5th day, 3 subgroups were defined: G1-normal deformation (RV-LS <-20%), G2-RV stunning (baseline RV-LS >-20%, 5th day RV-LS <-20%) and G3-persistent RV dysfunction (unchanged RV-LS > -20%). In G1, there was neither RV scar nor clinically relevant hypotension. In G2, 58% of patients developed RV scar and 36% had hypotension. In the G3, 83% developed RV scar and 55% had hypotension. The myocardial deformation analysis could provide an early prediction of RV scar. It allowed the patients to be divided into subgroups with normal RV function, stunning and persistent RV dysfunction.
See more in PubMed
Am J Cardiol. 1978 Dec;42(6):885-94 PubMed
Ital Heart J. 2002 Apr;3(4):241-7 PubMed
N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 28;330(17):1211-7 PubMed
Am Heart J. 2000 Apr;139(4):710-5 PubMed
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009 Jul;22(7):776-92; quiz 861-2 PubMed
Eur Heart J. 2001 Feb;22(4):340-8 PubMed
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23 (7):685-713; quiz 786-8 PubMed
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1998 Jan-Feb;40(4):325-41 PubMed
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Mar;194(3):592-8 PubMed
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Mar;21(3):275-83 PubMed
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):2023-33 PubMed
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Oct;14 (10 ):1002-9 PubMed
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Dec;10(6):1223-32 PubMed
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jan;37(1):37-43 PubMed
Postgrad Med J. 2010 Dec;86(1022):719-28 PubMed
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2006 Mar;7(2):79-108 PubMed
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Nov 15;114(10):1490-6 PubMed
Echocardiography. 2010 Feb;27(2):139-45 PubMed
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Sep 15;110(6):784-9 PubMed
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Nov 21;48(10):1969-76 PubMed
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45 PubMed
Clin Cardiol. 2010 Mar;33(3):E43-8 PubMed
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;114(2):243-9 PubMed
Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):219-26 PubMed
J Card Fail. 2012 Mar;18(3):208-15 PubMed
J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Jan;30(1):71-83 PubMed
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Aug;23 (8):823-31 PubMed
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep;2(3):226-34 PubMed
Circ J. 2013;77(3):756-63 PubMed
