A study to establish international diagnostic reference levels for paediatric computed tomography
Language English Country Great Britain, England Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
25836685
DOI
10.1093/rpd/ncv116
PII: ncv116
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Radiation Dosage MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Internationality MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Radiation Monitoring standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Pediatrics standards MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Health Care Surveys MeSH
- Radiation Exposure standards statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Reference Values MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Infant, Newborn MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The article reports results from the largest international dose survey in paediatric computed tomography (CT) in 32 countries and proposes international diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in terms of computed tomography dose index (CTDI vol) and dose length product (DLP). It also assesses whether mean or median values of individual facilities should be used. A total of 6115 individual patient data were recorded among four age groups: <1 y, >1-5 y, >5-10 y and >10-15 y. CTDIw, CTDI vol and DLP from the CT console were recorded in dedicated forms together with patient data and technical parameters. Statistical analysis was performed, and international DRLs were established at rounded 75th percentile values of distribution of median values from all CT facilities. The study presents evidence in favour of using median rather than mean of patient dose indices as the representative of typical local dose in a facility, and for establishing DRLs as third quartile of median values. International DRLs were established for paediatric CT examinations for routine head, chest and abdomen in the four age groups. DRLs for CTDI vol are similar to the reference values from other published reports, with some differences for chest and abdomen CT. Higher variations were observed between DLP values, based on a survey of whole multi-phase exams. It may be noted that other studies in literature were based on single phase only. DRLs reported in this article can be used in countries without sufficient medical physics support to identify non-optimised practice. Recommendations to improve the accuracy and importance of future surveys are provided.
Al Sabah Hospital Kuwait City Kuwait
Atomic Energy Commission of Syria Damascus Syria
Children Clinical University Hospital Riga Latvia
Clinical Radiology Institute University Medical Center Ljubljana Slovenia
Département de Physique Médicale Centre de Recherche Nucléaire D'Alger Algiers Algiers
Department of Radiology The National Hospital of Sri Lanka Colombo Sri Lanka
Faculty of Medicine Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand
Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital Boston USA
Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Science Kauno Klinikos Kaunas Lithuania
Institute of Nuclear Medicine and Oncology PAEC Lahore Pakistan
International Atomic Energy Agency Vienna Austria
Lebanese Atomic Eneregy Commission Beirut Lebanon
Mater Dei Hospital TalQroqq Msida Malta
Medical Education Department Dubai Health Authority Dubai UAE
Ministry of Health Malaysia Putrajaya Wilayah Persekutuan Malaysia
Ministry of Health Medical Technology and Infrastructure Administration Jerusalem Israel
National Centre of Public Health Chisinau Republic of Moldova
National Centre of Radiobiology and Radiation Protection Sofia Bulgaria
National Institute for Nuclear Research Carretera Mexico Toluca La Marquesa Ocoyoacac Mexico
National Nuclear Energy Commission Rio de Janeiro Brazil
National Radiation Protection Department Iranian Nuclear Regulatory Authority Tehran Iran
National Radiation Protection Institute Prague Czech Republic
North Estonia Medical Centre Tallinn Estonia
Pusat Kajian Radiografi dan Imajing Depok Indonesia
Radiation Protection Department Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences Belgrade Serbia
Radiologist Ministry of Health Yangon Myanmar
Research Center of Radiation Medicine and Burns Yerevan Armenia
Slovak Medical University Limbova Bratislava Slovakia
State Office for Radiological and Nuclear Safety Zagreb Croatia
Sudan Atomic Energy Commission Khartoum Sudan
Tanzania Atomic Energy Commission Arusha Tanzania
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Cidade Universitaria Recife PE Brazil
References provided by Crossref.org