Hedonic ratings of odors and olfactory preferences are influenced by a number of modulating factors, such as prior experience and knowledge about an odor's identity. The present study addresses the relationship between knowledge about an odor's identity due to prior experience, assessed by means of a test of cued odor identification, and odor pleasantness ratings in children who exhibit ongoing olfactory learning. Ninety-one children aged 8-11 years rated the pleasantness of odors in the Sniffin' Sticks test and, subsequently, took the odor identification test. A positive association between odor identification and pleasantness was found for two unpleasant food odors (garlic and fish): higher pleasantness ratings were exhibited by those participants who correctly identified these odors compared to those who failed to correctly identify them. However, we did not find a similar effect for any of the more pleasant odors. The results of this study suggest that pleasantness ratings of some odors may be modulated by the knowledge of their identity due to prior experience and that this relationship might be more evident in unpleasant odors.

Department of Anthropology Faculty of Humanities Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Anthropology Faculty of Humanities Charles University Prague Czech Republic ; Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic

School of Natural Sciences University of Stirling Stirling UK

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Ayabe-Kanamura S., Kikuchi T., Saito S. (1997). Effect of verbal cues on recognition memory and pleasantness evaluation of unfamiliar odors. Percept. Mot. Skill 85 275–285 10.2466/pms.1997.85.1.275 PubMed DOI

Ayabe-Kanamura S., Schicker I., Laska M., Hudson R., Distel H., Kobayakawa T., et al. (1998). Differences in perception of everyday odors: a Japanese-German cross-cultural study. Chem. Senses 23 31–38 10.1093/chemse/23.1.31 PubMed DOI

Bensafi M., Rinck F., Schaal B., Rouby C. (2007). Verbal cues modulate hedonic perception of odors in 5-year-old children as well as in adults. Chem. Senses 32 855–862 10.1093/chemse/bjm055 PubMed DOI

Bensafi M., Rouby C., Farget V., Bertrand B., Vigouroux M., Holley A. (2002). Autonomic nervous system responses to odours: the role of pleasantness and arousal. Chem. Senses 27 703–709 10.1093/chemse/27.8.703 PubMed DOI

Berman S., Friedman D., Hamberger M., Snodgrass J. G. (1989). Developmental picture norms: relationships between name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity for child and adult ratings of two sets of line drawings. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 21 371–382 10.3758/BF03202800 DOI

Boesveldt S., Frasnelli J., Gordon A. R., Lundstrom J. N. (2010). The fish is bad: negative food odors elicit faster and more accurate reactions than other odors. Biol. Psychol. 84 313–317 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.006 PubMed DOI

Boesveldt S., Verbaan D., Knol D. L., van Hilten J. J., Berendse H. W. (2008). Odour identification and discrimination in Dutch adults over 45 years. Rhinology 46 131–136. PubMed

Bonett D. G., Price R. M. (2002). Statistical inference for a linear function of medians: confidence intervals, hypothesis testing, and sample size requirements. Psychol. Methods 7 370–383 10.1037/1082-989X.7.3.370 PubMed DOI

Brand G., Millot J. L. (2001). Sex differences in human olfaction: between evidence and enigma. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 54 259–270 10.1080/02724990143000045 PubMed DOI

Cain W. S. (1979). To know with the nose – keys to odor identification. Science 203 467–470 10.1126/science.760202 PubMed DOI

Cain W. S., de Wijk R., Lulejian C., Schiet F., See L. C. (1998). Odor identification: perceptual and semantic dimensions. Chem. Senses 23 309–326 10.1093/chemse/23.3.309 PubMed DOI

Catana I., Negoias S., Maniu A., Porojan M., Cosgarea M. (2012). A modified version of the “Sniffin’ Sticks” odor identification test: the Romanian cultural adaptation. Clujul Med. 85 218–223.

Chambers C. T., Johnston C. (2002). Developmental differences in children’s use of rating scales. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 27 27–36 10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.27 PubMed DOI

Degel J., Piper D., Koster E. P. (2001). Implicit learning and implicit memory for odors: the influence of odor identification and retention time. Chem. Senses 26 267–280 10.1093/chemse/26.3.267 PubMed DOI

Delplanque S., Grandjean D., Chrea C., Aymard L., Cayeux I., Le Calve B., et al. (2008). Emotional processing of odors: evidence for a nonlinear relation between pleasantness and familiarity evaluations. Chem. Senses 33 469–479 10.1093/chemse/bjn014 PubMed DOI

Distel H., Ayabe-Kanamura S., Martinez-Gomez M., Schicker I., Kobayakawa T., Saito S., et al. (1999). Perception of everyday odors – correlation between intensity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem. Senses 24 191–199 10.1093/chemse/24.2.191 PubMed DOI

Doty R. L., Cameron E. L. (2009). Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol. Behav. 97 213–228 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.032 PubMed DOI PMC

Doty R. L., Cometto-Muñiz J. E. (2003). “Trigeminal chemosensation,” in Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation ed. Doty R. L. (New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc.) 981–999 10.1201/9780203911457 DOI

Dudova I., Vodicka J., Havlovicova M., Sedlacek Z., Urbanek T., Hrdlicka M. (2011). Odor detection threshold, but not odor identification, is impaired in children with autism. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 20 333–340 10.1007/s00787-011-0177-1 PubMed DOI

Duffey K. J., Huybrechts I., Mouratidou T., Libuda L., Kersting M., De Vriendt T., et al. (2012). Beverage consumption among European adolescents in the HELENA study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 66 244–252 10.1038/ejcn.2011.166 PubMed DOI PMC

Eibenstein A., Fioretti A., Lena C., Rosati N., Ottaviano I., Fusetti M. (2005). Olfactory screening test: experience in 102 Italian subjects. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 25 18–22. PubMed PMC

Ferdenzi C., Mustonen S., Tuorila H., Schaal B. (2008). Children’s awareness and uses of odor cues in everyday life: a Finland-France comparison. Chemosens. Percept. 1 190–198 10.1007/s12078-008-9020-6 DOI

Ferdenzi C., Roberts S. C., Schirmer A., Delplanque S., Cekic S., Porcherot C., et al. (2013). Variability of affective responses to odors: culture, gender, and olfactory knowledge. Chem. Senses 38 175–186 10.1093/chemse/bjs083 PubMed DOI

Field A. P. (2005). “Exploring data,” in Discovering Statistics using SPSS eds Breakwell G., de Leeuw J., O’Muircheartaigh C. (London: Sage Publications) 63–106.

Haehner A., Mayer A. M., Landis B. N., Pournaras I., Lill K., Gudziol V., et al. (2009). High test-retest reliability of the extended version of the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test. Chem. Senses 34 705–711 10.1093/chemse/bjp057 PubMed DOI

Herz R. S. (2003). The effect of verbal context on olfactory perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132 595–606 10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.595 PubMed DOI

Herz R. S. (2006). “I know what i like: understanding odor preferences,” in The Smell Culture Reader ed. Drobnick J. (Oxford: Berg Publishers) 190–203.

Hrdlicka M., Vodicka J., Havlovicova M., Urbanek T., Blatny M., Dudova I. (2011). Significant differences in perceived odor pleasantness found in children with ASD. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 41 524–527 10.1007/s10803-010-1084-x PubMed DOI

Hummel T., Bensafi M., Nikolaus J., Knecht M., Laing D. G., Schaal B. (2007a). Olfactory function in children assessed with psychophysical and electrophysiological techniques. Behav. Brain Res. 180 133–138 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.02.040 PubMed DOI

Hummel T., Kobal G., Gudziol H., Mackay-Sim A. (2007b). Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3000 subjects. Eur. Arch. Otorhingol. 264 237–243 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0 PubMed DOI

Hummel T., Sekinger B., Wolf S. R., Pauli E., Kobal G. (1997). ‘Sniffin’ Sticks’: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem. Senses 22 39–52 10.1093/chemse/22.1.39 PubMed DOI

IBM SPSS. (2012). Two Step Cluster Analysis, Software Tutorial, Version 21. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation.

Khan R. M., Luk C. H., Flinker A., Aggarwal A., Lapid H., Haddad R., et al. (2007). Predicting odor pleasantness from odorant structure: pleasantness as a reflection of the physical world. J. Neurosci. 27 10015–10023 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1158-07.2007 PubMed DOI PMC

Knaapila A., Keskitalo K., Kallela M., Wessman M., Sammalisto S., Hiekkalinna T., et al. (2007). Genetic component of identification, intensity and pleasantness of odours: a Finnish family study. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 15 596–602 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201804 PubMed DOI

Konstantinidis I., Hummel T., Larsson M. (2006). Identification of unpleasant odors is independent of age. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 21 615–621 10.1016/j.acn.2006.05.006 PubMed DOI

Konstantinidis I., Printza A., Genetzaki S., Mamali K., Kekes G., Constantinidis J. (2008). Cultural adaptation of an olfactory identification test: the Greek version of Sniffin’ Sticks. Rhinology 46 292–296. PubMed

Liem D. G., Zandstra L., Thomas A. (2010). Prediction of children’s flavour preferences. Effect of age and stability in reported preferences. Appetite 55 69–75 10.1016/j.appet.2010.04.002 PubMed DOI

Mandairon N., Poncelet J., Bensafi M., Didier A. (2009). Humans and mice express similar olfactory preferences. PLoS ONE 4:e4209 10.1371/journal.pone.0004209 PubMed DOI PMC

Marlier L., Schaal B., Soussignan R. (1998). Bottle-fed neonates prefer an odor experienced in utero to an odor experienced postnatally in the feeding context. Dev. Psychobiol. 33 133–145 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2302(199809)33:2<133::AID-DEV4>3.0.CO;2-K PubMed DOI

Meltzer H. M., Fotland T. Ø., Alexander J., Elind E., Hallström H., Lam H. R., et al. (2008). Risk Assessment of Caffeine among Children and Adolescents in the Nordic Countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.

Mennella J. A., Forestell C. A. (2008). Children’s hedonic responses to the odors of alcoholic beverages: a window to emotions. Alcohol 42 249–260 10.1016/j.alcohol.2008.03.129 PubMed DOI PMC

Monnery-Patris S., Rouby C., Nicklaus S., Issanchou S. (2009). Development of olfactory ability in children: sensitivity and identification. Dev. Psychobiol. 51 268–276 10.1002/dev.20363 PubMed DOI

Newcombe R. G., Altman D. G. (2000). “Proportions and their differences,” in Statistics with Confidence eds Altman D. G., Machin D., Bryant T. N., Gardner M. J. (London: British Medical Journal) 45–56.

Ng S. W., Mhurchu C. N., Jebb S. A., Popkin B. M. (2012). Patterns and trends of beverage consumption among children and adults in Great Britain, 1986-2009. Br. J. Nutr. 108 536–551 10.1017/S0007114511006465 PubMed DOI PMC

Orhan K. S., Karabulut B., Keles N., Deger K. (2012). Evaluation of factors concerning the olfaction using the Sniffin’ Sticks test. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 146 240–246 10.1177/0194599811425019 PubMed DOI

Poncelet J., Rinck F., Ziessel A., Joussain P., Thevenet M., Rouby C., et al. (2010). Semantic knowledge influences prewired hedonic responses to odors. PLoS ONE 5:e13878 10.1371/journal.pone.0013878 PubMed DOI PMC

Renner B., Mueller C. A., Dreier J., Faulhaber S., Rascher W., Kobal G. (2009). The candy smell test: a new test for retronasal olfactory performance. Laryngoscope 119 487–495 10.1002/lary.20123 PubMed DOI

Richman R. A., Sheehe P. R., Wallace K., Hyde J. M., Coplan J. (1995). Olfactory performance during childhood. II. Developing a discrimination task for children. J. Pediatr. 127 421–426 10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70074-9 PubMed DOI

Robin O., Alaoui-Ismaili O., Dittmar A., Vernet-Maury E. (1998). Emotional responses evoked by dental odors: an evaluation from autonomic parameters. J. Dent. Res. 77 1638–1646 10.1177/00220345980770081201 PubMed DOI

Robin O., Alaoui-Ismaili O., Dittmar A., Vernet-Maury E. (1999). Basic emotions evoked by eugenol odor differ according to the dental experience. A neurovegetative analysis. Chem. Senses 24 327–335 10.1093/chemse/24.3.327 PubMed DOI

Rouby C., Pouliot S., Bensafi M. (2009). Odor hedonics and their modulators. Food Qual. Prefer. 20 545–549 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.004 DOI

Royet J. P., Koenig O., Gregoire M. C., Cinotti L., Lavenne F., Le Bars D., et al. (1999). Functional anatomy of perceptual and semantic processing for odors. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11 94–109 10.1162/089892999563166 PubMed DOI

Savic I., Berglund H. (2000). Right-nostril dominance in discrimination of unfamiliar, but not familiar, odours. Chem. Senses 25 517–523 10.1093/chemse/25.5.517 PubMed DOI

Saxton T., Martinec Nováková L., Jash R., Šandová A., Plotěná D., Havlíček J. (2014). Sex differences in olfactory behavior in Namibian and Czech children. Chemosens. Percept. 7 117–125 10.1007/s12078-014-9172-5 DOI

Scherer K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inform. 44 695–729 10.1177/0539018405058216 DOI

Soussignan R., Schaal B., Marlier L., Jiang T. (1997). Facial and autonomic responses to biological and artificial olfactory stimuli in human neonates: re-examining early hedonic discrimination of odors. Physiol. Behav. 62 745–758 10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00187-X PubMed DOI

Stevenson R. J. (2010). An initial evaluation of the functions of human olfaction. Chem. Senses 35 3–20 10.1093/chemse/bjp083 PubMed DOI

Sulmont C., Issanchou S., Koster E. P. (2002). Selection of odorants for memory tests on the basis of familiarity, perceived complexity, pleasantness, similarity and identification. Chem. Senses 27 307–317 10.1093/chemse/27.4.307 PubMed DOI

Wilcox R. R. (2010). Fundamentals of Modern Statistical Methods: Substantially Improving Power and Accuracy. New York, NY: Springer; 29–46 10.1007/978-1-4419-5525-8_3 DOI

Effects of diversity in olfactory environment on children's sense of smell