Effects of diversity in olfactory environment on children's sense of smell
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
29440654
PubMed Central
PMC5811485
DOI
10.1038/s41598-018-20236-0
PII: 10.1038/s41598-018-20236-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- analýza rozptylu MeSH
- čichová percepce * MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- odoranty MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- rodiče MeSH
- životní prostředí * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Diversity in children's everyday olfactory environment may affect the development of their olfactory abilities and odor awareness. To test this, we collected data on olfactory abilities using the Sniffin' Sticks and odor awareness with Children's Olfactory Behaviors in Everyday Life Questionnaire in 153 preschool children and retested them one and a half year later. Parents completed an inventory on children's exposure to a variety of odors and on their own odor awareness using the Odor Awareness Scale. We controlled for the effects of age and verbal fluency on the children's performance. We found that the children's odor identification and discrimination scores differed as a function of parental odor awareness. Although these effects were rather small, they were commensurate in size with those of gender and age. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to present evidence that diversity in children's olfactory environment affects variation in their olfactory abilities and odor awareness. We suggest that future studies consider the long-term impact of perceptual learning out of the laboratory and its consequences for olfactory development.
Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 44 Prague 2 Czech Republic
National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A. Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:237–243. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0. PubMed DOI
Dematte ML, et al. Individual variability in the awareness of odors: Demographic parameters and odor identification ability. Chemosens. Percept. 2011;4:175–185. doi: 10.1007/s12078-011-9103-7. DOI
Hawkes, C. H. & Doty, R. L. In The Neurology of Olfaction 1–58 (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
Doty RL, Kamath V. The influences of age on olfaction: a review. Front. Psychol. 2014;5:20. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00020. PubMed DOI PMC
Monnery-Patris S, Rouby C, Nicklaus S, Issanchou S. Development of olfactory ability in children: sensitivity and identification. Dev. Psychobiol. 2009;51:268–276. doi: 10.1002/dev.20363. PubMed DOI
Stevenson RJ, Mahmut M, Sundqvist N. Age-related changes in odor discrimination. Dev. Psychol. 2007;43:253–260. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.253. PubMed DOI
Larjola K, von Wright J. Memory of odors: Developmental data. Percept. Mot. Skills. 1976;42:1138–1138. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.42.3c.1138. DOI
Hvastja L, Zanuttini L. Odor memory and odor hedonics in children. Perception. 1989;18:391–396. doi: 10.1068/p180391. PubMed DOI
Frank RA, Brearton M, Rybalsky K, Cessna T, Howe S. Consistent flavor naming predicts recognition memory in children and young adults. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011;22:173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.009. DOI
Mennella JA, Beauchamp GK. Developmental changes in nasal airflow patterns. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 1992;112:1025–1031. doi: 10.3109/00016489209137505. PubMed DOI
Cohen-Kettenis, P. T. & Pfäfflin, F. Transgenderism and intersexuality in childhood and adolescence: Making choices. (Sage, 2003).
Eckert, L. Intersexualization: The clinic and the colony. 248 (Routledge, 2017).
Brand G, Millot JL. Sex differences in human olfaction: Between evidence and enigma. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B. 2001;54:259–270. doi: 10.1080/02724990143000045. PubMed DOI
Knaapila A, et al. Genetic component of identification, intensity and pleasantness of odours: a Finnish family study. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2007;15:596–602. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201804. PubMed DOI
Damm M, et al. Intranasal volume and olfactory function. Chem. Senses. 2002;27:831–839. doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.9.831. PubMed DOI
Seubert J, Freiherr J, Frasnelli J, Hummel T, Lundström JN. Orbitofrontal cortex and olfactory bulb volume predict distinct aspects of olfactory performance in healthy subjects. Cereb. Cortex. 2013;23:2448–2456. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs230. PubMed DOI
Zhao, K. & Frye, R. E. In Handbook of Olfaction and Gustation (ed. R. L. Doty) Ch. 16, 355–374 (John Wiley & Sons, 2015).
Doty RL, Cameron EL. Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiol. Behav. 2009;97:213–228. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.032. PubMed DOI PMC
Hedner M, Larsson M, Arnold N, Zucco GM, Hummel T. Cognitive factors in odor detection, odor discrimination, and odor identification tasks. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsychol. 2010;32:1062–1067. doi: 10.1080/13803391003683070. PubMed DOI
Gottfried JA, Dolan RJ. The nose smells what the eye sees: Crossmodal visual facilitation of human olfactory perception. Neuron. 2003;39:375–386. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00392-1. PubMed DOI
Ayabe Kanamura S, et al. Differences in perception of everyday odors: a Japanese- German cross-cultural study. Chem. Senses. 1998;23:31–38. doi: 10.1093/chemse/23.1.31. PubMed DOI
Engen, T. In Perfumery: The Psychology and Biology of Fragrance (ed S. Van Toller, Dodd, G. H.) 79–90 (Chapman & Hall, 1988).
Cain WS, Johnson F. Lability of odor pleasantness: influence of mere exposure. Perception. 1978;7:459–465. doi: 10.1068/p070459. PubMed DOI
Ferdenzi C, Mustonen S, Tuorila H, Schaal B. Children’s awareness and uses of odor cues in everyday life: A Finland-France comparison. Chemosens. Percept. 2008;1:190–198. doi: 10.1007/s12078-008-9020-6. DOI
Ferdenzi C, et al. Variability of affective responses to odors: Culture, gender, and olfactory knowledge. Chem. Senses. 2013;38:175–186. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs083. PubMed DOI
Sorokowska A, Sorokowski P, Hummel T, Huanca T. Olfaction and environment: Tsimane’ of bolivian rainforest have lower threshold of odor detection than industrialized German people. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069203. PubMed DOI PMC
Seo HS, et al. Attitudes toward olfaction: A cross-regional study. Chem. Senses. 2011;36:177–187. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjq112. PubMed DOI
Saxton TK, et al. Sex differences in olfactory behavior in Namibian and Czech children. Chemosens. Percept. 2014;7:117–125. doi: 10.1007/s12078-014-9172-5. DOI
Fahle, M. & Poggio, T. Perceptual Learning. (MIT Press, 2002).
Gilbert CD, Sigman M, Crist RE. The neural basis of perceptual learning. Neuron. 2001;31:681–697. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00424-X. PubMed DOI
Goldstone RL. Perceptual learning. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1998;49:585–612. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.585. PubMed DOI
Gawel R. The use of language by trained and untrained experienced wine tasters. J. Sens. Stud. 1997;12:267–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1997.tb00067.x. DOI
Royet J-P, Plailly J, Saive A-L, Veyrac A, Delon-Martin C. The impact of expertise in olfaction. Front. Psychol. 2013;4:928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00928. PubMed DOI PMC
Bende M, Nordin S. Perceptual learning in olfaction: Professional wine tasters versus controls. Physiol. Behav. 1997;62:1065–1070. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00251-5. PubMed DOI
Parr WV, Heatherbell D, White KG. Demystifying wine expertise: Olfactory threshold, perceptual skill and semantic memory in expert and novice wine judges. Chem. Senses. 2002;27:747–755. doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.8.747. PubMed DOI
Brand G, Brisson R. Lateralization in wine olfactory threshold detection: Comparison between experts and novices. Laterality. 2012;17:583–596. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2011.595955. PubMed DOI
Rabin MD, Cain WS. Determinants of measured olfactory sensitivity. Percept. Psychophys. 1986;39:281–286. doi: 10.3758/BF03204936. PubMed DOI
Dalton P, Doolittle N, Breslin PAS. Gender-specific induction of enhanced sensitivity to odors. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5:199–200. doi: 10.1038/nn803. PubMed DOI
Wysocki CJ, Dorries KM, Beauchamp GK. Ability to perceive androstenone can be acquired by ostensibly anosmic people. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;86:7976–7978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.20.7976. PubMed DOI PMC
Mainland JD, et al. Olfactory plasticity - One nostril knows what the other learns. Nature. 2002;419:802–802. doi: 10.1038/419802a. PubMed DOI
Arshamian A, Willander J, Larsson M. Olfactory awareness is positively associated to odour memory. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2011;23:220–226. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.483226. DOI
Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. Two distinct neuronal networks mediate the awareness of environment and of self. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011;23:570–578. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21488. PubMed DOI
Gilbert AN, Crouch M, Kemp SE. Olfactory and visual mental imagery. J. Ment. Imagery. 1998;22:137–146.
Nováková L, Valentova JV, Havlíček J. Engagement in olfaction-related activities is associated with the ability of odor identification and odor awareness. Chemosens. Percept. 2014;7:56–67. doi: 10.1007/s12078-014-9167-2. DOI
Martinec Nováková L, Vojtušová Mrzílková R. Children’s exposure to odors in everyday contexts predicts their odor awareness. Chemosens. Percept. 2016;9:56–68. doi: 10.1007/s12078-016-9205-3. DOI
Calderon-Garciduenas L, et al. Urban air pollution: Influences on olfactory function and pathology in exposed children and young adults. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2010;62:91–102. doi: 10.1016/j.etp.2009.02.117. PubMed DOI PMC
Philpott C, Goodenough P, Passant C, Robertson A, Murty G. The effect of temperature, humidity and peak inspiratory nasal flow on olfactory thresholds. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2004;29:24–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00760.x. PubMed DOI
Katotomichelakis M, et al. The effect of smoking on the olfactory function. Rhinology. 2007;45:273–280. PubMed
Rupp CI, et al. Reduced olfactory sensitivity, discrimination, and identification in patients with alcohol dependence. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2003;27:432–439. doi: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000057945.57330.2C. PubMed DOI
Islam, M. A. et al. Olfaction in eating disorders and abnormal eating behavior: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 6, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01431 (2015). PubMed PMC
Gobba F. Olfactory toxicity: long-term effects of occupational exposures. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 2006;79:322–331. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0043-x. PubMed DOI
Kuhn P, Astruc D, Messer J, Marlier L. Exploring the olfactory environment of premature newborns: a French survey of health care and cleaning products used in neonatal units. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:334–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.02076.x. PubMed DOI
Bridges B. Fragrance: emerging health and environmental concerns. Flavour and Frag. J. 2002;17:361–371. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1106. DOI
Ponthiere G. Mortality, family and lifestyles. J. Fam. Econ. Issues. 2011;32:175–190. doi: 10.1007/s10834-010-9229-9. DOI
Bohacek J, Mansuy IM. Molecular insights into transgenerational non-genetic inheritance of acquired behaviours. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015;16:641–652. doi: 10.1038/nrg3964. PubMed DOI
Lane M, Robker RL, Robertson SA. Parenting from before conception. Science. 2014;345:756–760. doi: 10.1126/science.1254400. PubMed DOI
Horstman, K. & Smand, C. In Genetics from the laboratory to society: societal learning as an alternative to regulation (eds de Vries, G. & Horstman, K.) 90–117 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
Mennella, J. A. & Ventura, A. K. In Early nutrition: Impact on short- and long-term health Vol. 68 (eds van Goudoever, H., Guandalini, S. & Kleinman, R. E.) 153–168 (Karger, 2011). PubMed
Rozin P, Singh L. The moralization of cigarette smoking in the United States. J. Consum. Psychol. 1999;8:321–337. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0803_07. DOI
Soo MLM, Stevenson RJ. The moralisation of body odor. Mankind Quart. 2007;47:25–56.
Cameron EL, Doty RL. Odor identification testing in children and young adults using the smell wheel. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:346–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.11.022. PubMed DOI
Ferdenzi C, Coureaud G, Camos V, Schaal B. Human awareness and uses of odor cues in everyday life: Results from a questionnaire study in children. International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2008;32:422–431. doi: 10.1177/0165025408093661. DOI
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2 edn, (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1988).
Murphy, K. R., Myors, B. & Wolach, A. Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests. 4 edn, (Routledge, 2014).
Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: A Guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 2009;40:532–538. doi: 10.1037/a0015808. DOI
Cumming G. The New Statistics: Why and How. Psychol. Sci. 2014;25:7–29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. PubMed DOI
Smeets MAM, Schifferstein HNJ, Boelema SR, Lensvelt-Mulders G. The Odor Awareness Scale: A new scale for measuring positive and negative odor awareness. Chem. Senses. 2008;33:725–734. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjn038. PubMed DOI
Greenleaf EA. Measuring extreme response style. Public Opin. Q. 1992;56:328–351. doi: 10.1086/269326. DOI
Merrens M. Generality and stability of extreme response style. Psychol. Rep. 1970;27:802–802. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1970.27.3.802. DOI
Cliff K, Millei Z. Biopower and the “civilisation” of children’s bodies in a preschool bathroom: An Australian case study. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 2011;62:351–362. doi: 10.1111/issj.12005. DOI
Simes MR, Berg DH. Surreptitious learning: Menarche and menstrual product advertisements. Health Care Women Int. 2001;22:455–469. doi: 10.1080/073993301317094281. PubMed DOI
Addessi E, Galloway AT, Visalberghi E, Birch LL. Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2-5-year-old children. Appetite. 2005;45:264–271. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2005.07.007. PubMed DOI
Rabin MD. Experience facilitates olfactory quality discrimination. Percept. Psychophys. 1988;44:532–540. doi: 10.3758/BF03207487. PubMed DOI
Jehl C, Royet JP, Holley A. Odor discrimination and recognition memory as a function of familiarization. Percept. Psychophys. 1995;57:1002–1011. doi: 10.3758/BF03205459. PubMed DOI
Cain WS. Odor identification by males and females: predictions versus performance. Chem. Senses. 1982;7:129–142. doi: 10.1093/chemse/7.2.129. DOI
Zucco GM, Carassai A, Baroni MR, Stevenson RJ. Labeling, identification, and recognition of wine-relevant odorants in expert sommeliers, intermediates, and untrained wine drinkers. Perception. 2011;40:598–607. doi: 10.1068/p6972. PubMed DOI
Buschhüter D, et al. Correlation between olfactory bulb volume and olfactory function. Neuroimage. 2008;42:498–502. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.004. PubMed DOI
Hummel T, et al. Correlation between olfactory bulb volume and olfactory function in children and adolescents. Exp. Brain Res. 2011;214:285–291. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2832-7. PubMed DOI
Frasnelli J, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of olfactory performance. Exp. Brain Res. 2010;201:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1999-7. PubMed DOI
Li W, Howard JD, Parrish TB, Gottfried JA. Aversive learning enhances perceptual and cortical discrimination of indiscriminable odor cues. Science. 2008;319:1842–1845. doi: 10.1126/science.1152837. PubMed DOI PMC
Li W, Luxenberg E, Parrish T, Gottfried JA. Learning to smell the roses: Experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices. Neuron. 2006;52:1097–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.026. PubMed DOI PMC
Castriota-Scanderbeg A, et al. The appreciation of wine by sommeliers: a functional magnetic resonance study of sensory integration. Neuroimage. 2005;25:570–578. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.045. PubMed DOI
Plailly J, Delon-Martin C, Royet JP. Experience induces functional reorganization in brain regions involved in odor imagery in perfumers. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012;33:224–234. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21207. PubMed DOI PMC
Delon-Martin C, Plailly J, Fonlupt P, Veyrac A, Royet JP. Perfumers’ expertise induces structural reorganization in olfactory brain regions. Neuroimage. 2013;68:55–62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.044. PubMed DOI
Rochefort C, Gheusi G, Vincent JD, Lledo PM. Enriched odor exposure increases the number of newborn neurons in the adult olfactory bulb and improves odor memory. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:2679–2689. PubMed PMC
Mandairon N, Stack C, Kiselycznyk C, Linster C. Enrichment to odors improves olfactory discrimination in adult rats. Behav. Neurosci. 2006;120:173–179. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.1.173. PubMed DOI
Hummel T, Roudnitzky N, Kempter W. Intranasal trigeminal function in children. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2007;49:849–853. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00849.x. PubMed DOI
Gottfried, A. E. In Handbook ofmotivation at school (eds Wentzel, K. R. & Wigfield, A.) Ch. 21, 463–475 (Routledge, 2009).
MacPhee, M. Deodorized Culture: Anthropology of Smell in America. Arizona Anthropologist8, 89–102 (1992).
Renner B, et al. The Candy Smell Test: A new test for retronasal olfactory performance. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:487–495. doi: 10.1002/lary.20123. PubMed DOI
Richman RA, Post EM, Sheehe PR, Wright HN. Olfactory performance during childhood. I. Development of an odorant identification test for children. J. Pediatr. 1992;121:908–911. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)80337-3. PubMed DOI
Stevenson RJ, Sundqvist N, Mahmut M. Age-related changes in discrimination of unfamiliar odors. Percept. Psychophys. 2007;69:185–192. doi: 10.3758/BF03193741. PubMed DOI
van Spronsen E, Ebbens FA, Fokkens WJ. Olfactory function in healthy children: Normative data for odor identification. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy. 2013;27:197–201. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3865. PubMed DOI
Martinec Nováková L, Vojtušová Mrzílková R. Temperamental influences on children’s olfactory performance: The role of self-regulation. Chemosens. Percept. 2016;9:153–173. doi: 10.1007/s12078-016-9216-0. DOI
Sorokowska A, et al. Changes of olfactory abilities in relation to age: odor identification in more than 1400 people aged 4 to 80 years. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:1937–1944. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3263-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Richman RA, Sheehe PR, Wallace K, Hyde JM, Coplan J. Olfactory performance during childhood. II. Developing a discrimination task for children. J. Pediatr. 1995;127:421–426. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70074-9. PubMed DOI
Schriever VA, et al. The “Sniffin’ Kids” Test - A 14-item odor identification test for children. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e101086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101086. PubMed DOI PMC
Dzaman K, Zielnik-Jurkiewicz B, Jurkiewicz D, Molinska-Glura M. Test for screening olfactory function in children. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;77:418–423. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.12.001. PubMed DOI
Karkazis, K. Fixing sex: Intersex, medical authority, and lived experience. 380 (Duke University Press, 2008).
Zderic, S. A., Canning, D. A., Carr, M. C. & Snyder III, H. M. Pediatric gender assignment: A critical reappraisal. (Springer Science+Business Media, 2002).
Fausto-Sterling, A. Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. (Routledge, 2012).
Nováková L, Valentova JV, Havlíček J. Olfactory performance is predicted by individual sex-atypicality, but not sexual orientation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e80234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080234. PubMed DOI PMC
Richman RA, Wallace K, Sheehe PR. Assessment of an abbreviated odorant identification task for children: a rapid screening device for schools and clinics. Acta Paediatr. 1995;84:434–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13666.x. PubMed DOI
Öberg C, Larsson M, Backman L. Differential sex effects in olfactory functioning: The role of verbal processing. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2002;8:691–698. doi: 10.1017/S1355617702801424. PubMed DOI
Ahadi, S. A. & Rothbart, M. K. In Thedevelopingstructure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (eds Halverson Jr, C. F., Kohnstamm, G. A. & Martin, R. P.) 189–208 (Psychology Press, 2014).
Martinec Nováková, L., Vojtušová Mrzílková, R. & Kernerová, A. Gender differences in influences of temperament on olfactory reactivity and awareness. Sci. Rep.7, 8920, 10.1038/s41598-017-09231-z (2017). PubMed PMC
Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf SR, Pauli E, Kobal G. ‘Sniffin’ Sticks’: Olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold. Chem. Senses. 1997;22:39–52. doi: 10.1093/chemse/22.1.39. PubMed DOI
Martinec Nováková, L., Plotěná, D., Roberts, S. C. & Havlíček, J. Positive relationship between odor identification and affective responses of negatively valenced odors. Front. Psychol. 6, 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00607 (2015). PubMed PMC
Preiss M. Verbální fluence, metoda vyšetření poškození mozku u dětí a dospělých. Cesk. Psychol. 1997;41:244–249.
Ferdenzi, C. Variations interindividuelles des comportements olfactifs chez les enfants de 6–12 ans, Université de Bourgogne, (2007).
Stevens, J. P. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. (Routledge, 2009).
IBM Corp., IBM Knowledge Center (2017).
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows v. 24 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, 2016).
R Development Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing, (2008).
Field, A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. (SAGE Publications, 2005).
Cumming, G. Understanding The New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis. (Routledge, 2012).
missForest: Nonparametric Missing Value Imputation using Random Forest v. 1.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013).
Starkweather, J. A new recommended way of dealing with multiple missing values: Using missForest for all your imputation needs. Benchmarks RSS MattersJuly 2014 (2014).
Waljee, A. K. et al. Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicine. BMJ Open3, 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002847 (2013). PubMed PMC
Package ‘missForest’: Nonparametric Missing Value Imputation using Random Forest (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zürich, Switzerland, 2013).
Rosnow RL, Rosenthal R. Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people’s published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychol. Methods. 1996;1:331–340. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.331. DOI
IBM Support. Effect Size: Relationship between partial Eta-squared, Cohen’s f, and Cohen’s d, http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21476421 (2016).