A novel diagnostic index combining HE4, CA125 and age may improve triage of women with suspected ovarian cancer - An international multicenter study in women with an ovarian mass
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Multicenter Study
PubMed
26086566
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.06.021
PII: S0090-8258(15)30041-X
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Age, Biomarkers, CA125, CPH-I, Copenhagen Index, HE4, Ovarian cancer, Tumor markers,
- MeSH
- Algorithms MeSH
- CA-125 Antigen blood MeSH
- Diagnosis, Differential MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Membrane Proteins blood MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Multivariate Analysis MeSH
- Biomarkers, Tumor blood MeSH
- Ovarian Neoplasms blood diagnosis pathology MeSH
- Ovarian Diseases blood diagnosis pathology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2 MeSH
- Proteins metabolism MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Models, Statistical MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Age Factors MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Names of Substances
- CA-125 Antigen MeSH
- Membrane Proteins MeSH
- MUC16 protein, human MeSH Browser
- Biomarkers, Tumor MeSH
- WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2 MeSH
- Proteins MeSH
- WFDC2 protein, human MeSH Browser
AIM: To develop and validate a biomarker-based index to optimize referral and diagnosis of patients with suspected ovarian cancer. Furthermore, to compare this new index with the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) and Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A training study, consisting of patients with benign ovarian disease (n=809) and ovarian cancer (n=246), was used to develop the Copenhagen Index (CPH-I) utilizing the variables serum HE4, serum CA125 and patient age. Eight international studies provided the validation population; comprising 1060 patients with benign ovarian masses and 550 patients with ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Overall, 2665 patients were included. CPH-I was highly significant in discriminating benign from malignant ovarian disease. At the defined cut-off of 0.070 for CPH-I the sensitivity and specificity were 95.0% and 78.4% respectively in the training cohort and 82.0% and 88.4% in the validation cohort. Comparison of CPH-I, ROMA and RMI demonstrated area-under-curve (AUC) at 0.960, 0.954 and 0.959 respectively in the training study and 0.951, 0.953 and 0.935 respectively in the validation study. Using a sensitivity of 95.0%, the specificities for CPH-I, ROMA and RMI in the training cohort were 78.4%, 71.7% and 81.5% respectively, and in the validation cohort 67.3%, 70.7% and 69.5% respectively. CONCLUSION: All three indices perform well at the clinically relevant sensitivity of 95%, but CPH-I, unlike RMI and ROMA, is independent of ultrasound and menopausal status, and may provide a simple index to optimize referral of women with suspected ovarian cancer.
Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute Li Ka Shing Centre Robinson Way Cambridge UK
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Gynecology Rigshospitalet University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Laboratory Medicine Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Brno Czech Republic
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology MCU FDT Medical Foundation Philippines
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden
Gynecologic Oncology Unit La Paz University Hospital Madrid Spain
References provided by Crossref.org