Automated versus Manual Oxygen Control with Different Saturation Targets and Modes of Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
PubMed
26144575
DOI
10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.012
PII: S0022-3476(15)00595-8
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- jednotky intenzivní péče o novorozence MeSH
- klinické křížové studie MeSH
- kyslík krev terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec nedonošený MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- oxymetrie metody MeSH
- umělé dýchání metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
- Kanada MeSH
- Názvy látek
- kyslík MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of automated adjustment of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) in maintaining arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) within a higher (91%-95%) and a lower (89%-93%) target range in preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty preterm infants (gestational age [median]: 26 weeks, age [median] 18 days) on noninvasive (n = 50) and invasive (n = 30) respiratory support with supplemental oxygen, were first randomized to one of the SpO2 target ranges and then treated with automated FiO2 (A-FiO2) and manual FiO2 (M-FiO2) oxygen control for 24 hours each, in random sequence. RESULTS: The percent time within the target range was higher during A-FiO2 compared with M-FiO2 control. This effect was more pronounced in the lower SpO2 target range (62 ± 17% vs 54 ± 16%, P < .001) than in the higher SpO2 target range (62 ± 17% vs 58 ± 15%, P < .001). The percent time spent below the target or in hypoxemia (SpO2 <80%) was consistently reduced during A-FiO2, independent of the target range. The time spent above the target range or at extreme hyperoxemia (SpO2 >98%) was only reduced during A-FiO2 when targeting the lower SpO2 range (89%-93%). These outcomes did not differ between infants on noninvasive and invasive respiratory support. Manual adjustments were significantly reduced during A-FiO2 control. CONCLUSIONS: A-FiO2 control improved SpO2 targeting across different SpO2 ranges and reduced hypoxemia in preterm infants on noninvasive and invasive respiratory support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 56626482.
Alberta Children's Hospital Calgary Canada
Czech Technical University Prague Prague Czech Republic; Economedtrx Lake Arrowhead CA
Emma Children's Hospital AMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough United Kingdom
Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
Silesian Institute Mother and Newborn Chorzow Poland
The Medical Center of Postgraduate Education Warsaw Poland
University Hospital North Tees Stockton Cleveland United Kingdom
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
ISRCTN
ISRCTN56626482
