OBJECTIVE: Changes in oximeter averaging times have been noted to affect alarm settings. Automated algorithms (A-FiO2) assess FiO2 faster than oximeter averaging, potentially impacting their effectiveness. METHODS: In a single NICU routinely using 15 fabian-PRICO A-FiO2 systems, neonates were randomly exposed to SpO2 averaging time settings switched every 12 h among short (2-4 s), medium (10 s), and long (16 s) oximeter averaging times for the entire duration of their A-FiO2 exposure. Primary endpoints were the percent time in the set SpO2 target range (dependent on PMA), SpO2 < 80%, and SpO2 > 98%, excluding FiO2 = 0.21. RESULTS: Ten VLBW neonates were enrolled over 11 months. At entry, they were 17 days old (IQR: 14-19), with an adjusted gestational age of 29 weeks (IQR: 27-30). The study included data from 272 days of A-FiO2 control (34% short, 32% medium, and 34% long). Respiratory support was predominantly non-invasive (53% NCPAP, 40% HFNC, and 6% NIPPV). The aggregate SpO2 exposure levels were 67% (IQR: 55-82) in the target range, 5.4% (IQR: 2.0-10) with SpO2 < 80%, and 1.2% (IQR: 0.4-3.1) with SpO2 > 98%. There were no differences in the target range time between the SpO2 averaging time settings. There were differences at the SpO2 extremes (p ≤ 0.001). The medium and long averaging were both lower than the short, with the difference larger than predicted. Multivariate analysis revealed that these findings were independent of subject, ventilation mode, target range, and overall stability. CONCLUSIONS: This A-FiO2 algorithm is effective regardless of the SpO2 averaging time setting. There is an advantage to the longer settings, which suggest an interaction with the controller.

Department of Biomedical Technology Faculty of Biomedical Engineering Czech Technical University Prague Kladno Czechia

Department of Neonatology Motol University Hospital Prague Czechia

See more in PubMed

Askie LM, Darlow BA, Finer N, Schmidt B, Stenson B, Tarnow-Mordi W, et al. Association between oxygen saturation targeting and death or disability in extremely preterm infants in the neonatal oxygenation prospective meta-analysis collaboration. JAMA. (2018) 319(21):2190–201. 10.1001/jama.2018.5725 PubMed DOI PMC

Poets C, Roberts R, Schmidt B, Whyte R, Asztolos E, Bader D, et al. Association between intermittent hypoxemia or bradycardia and late death or disability in extremely preterm infants. JAMA. (2015) 314(6):595–603. 10.1001/jama.2015.8841 PubMed DOI

Schmidt B, Whyte RK, Shah PS, Abbasi S, Bairam A, Harrold J, et al. Effects of targeting higher or lower oxygen saturations in centers with more versus less separation between median saturations. J Pediatr. (2016) 178:288–91. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.002 PubMed DOI

Hagadorn JJ, Sink DW, Buus-Frank ME, Edwards E, Marrow L, Hobar J, et al. Alarm safety and oxygen saturation targets in the Vermont Oxford Network iNICQ 2015 collaborative. J Perinatol. (2017) 37:270–6. 10.1038/jp.2016.219 PubMed DOI

van Zanten HA, Tan RN, van den Hoogen A, Laporiore E, tePas AB. Compliance in oxygen saturation targeting in preterm infants: a systematic review. Eur J Pediatr. (2015) 174(12):1561–72. 10.1007/s00431-015-2643-0 PubMed DOI PMC

van Zanten HA, Tan RN, Thio M, de Man-van Ginkel JM, van Zwet EW, Lopriore E, et al. The risk for hyperoxaemia after apnoea, bradycardia and hypoxaemia in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2014) 99(4):F269–73. 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305745 PubMed DOI

Abdo M, Hanbal A, Asla MM, Ishqair A, Alfar M, Elnaiem W, et al. Automated versus manual oxygen control in preterm infants receiving respiratory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. (2022) 35(25):6069–76. 10.1080/14767058.2021.1904875 PubMed DOI

Salverda HH, Cramer SJE, Witlox RSGM, Dargaville PA, Te Pas AB. Automated oxygen control in preterm infants, how does it work and what to expect: a narrative review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2021) 106(2):215–21. 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318918 PubMed DOI

Van Zanten HA, Kuypers KLAM, Stenson BJ, Bachman TE, Pauws SC, Te Pas AB. The effect of implementing an automated oxygen control on oxygen saturation in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2017) 102(5):F395–9. 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312172 PubMed DOI

Nair V, Kannan Loganathan P, Lal MK, Pringleton H, Bachman TE, Brodlie M, et al. Automatic oxygen control for reducing extremes of oxygen saturation: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2023) 108(2):136–41. 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324160 PubMed DOI

Wilinska M, Bachman T, Piwowarczyk P, Kostuch M, Tousty J, Berła K, et al. Routine use of automated FiO2 control in Poland: an observational report. Presented at Montreux-EPNV May 2023.

Salverda HH, Dekker J, Lopriore E, Dargaville PA, Pauws SC, Te Pas AB. Comparison of two automated oxygen controllers in oxygen targeting in preterm infants during admission: an observational study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2023) 108(1):26–30. 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323690 PubMed DOI

Warakomska M, Bachman TE, Wilinska M. Evaluation of two SpO2 alarm strategies during automated FiO2 control in the NICU: a randomized cross-over study. BMC Pediatr. (2019) 6:19. 10.1186/s12887-019-1496-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Schwarz CE, Kreutzer KB, Langanky L, Wolf NS, Braun W, O’Sullivan MP, et al. Randomised cross-over trial comparing algorithms and averaging times for automatic oxygen control in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2022) 107(4):425–30. 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322096 PubMed DOI

McClure C, Jang SY, Fairchild K. Alarms, oxygen saturations, and SpO2 averaging time in the NICU. J Neonatal Perinatal Med. (2016) 9(4):357–62. 10.3233/NPM-16162 PubMed DOI PMC

Vagedes J, Dietz K, Poets CF. Observational study on the influence of averaging time on oximetry results in infants and children. Acta Paediatr. (2019) 108(12):2246–52. 10.1111/apa.14914 PubMed DOI

Vagedes J, Bialkowski A, Wiechers C, Poets CF, Dietz K. A conversion formula for comparing pulse oximeter desaturation rates obtained with different averaging times. PLoS One. (2014) 9(1):e87280. 10.1371/journal.pone.0087280 PubMed DOI PMC

Dijkman KP, Goos TG, Dieleman JP, Mohns T, van Pul C, Andriessen P, et al. Predictive intelligent control of oxygenation in preterm infants: a two-center feasibility study. Neonatology. (2023) 120(2):235–41. 10.1159/000527539 PubMed DOI

Dijkman KP, Mohns T, Dieleman JP, van Pul C, Goos TG, Reiss IK, et al. Predictive intelligent control of oxygenation (PRICO) in preterm infants on high flow nasal cannula support: a randomised cross-over study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. (2021) 106(6):621–6. 10.1136/archdischild-2020-320728 PubMed DOI

van Kaam AH, Humler H, Wilinska M, Swietlinsi J, Lal M, tePas A, et al. Automated versus manual oxygen control with different saturation targets and modes of respiratory support in preterm infants. J Pediatr. (2015) 167(3):545–50.e1-2. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.012 PubMed DOI

Wilinska M, Bachman TE, Swietlinski J, Kostro A, Twardoch-Drozd M. Automated FiO2-SpO2 control system in neonates requiring respiratory support: a comparison of a standard to a narrow SpO2 control range. BMC Pediatr. (2014) 14:130. 10.1186/1471-2431-14-130 PubMed DOI PMC

van den Heuvel MEN, van Zanten HA, Bachman TE, Te Pas AB, van Kaam AH, Onland W. Optimal target range of closed-loop inspired oxygen support in preterm infants: a randomized cross-over study. J Pediatr. (2018) 197:36–41. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.01.077 PubMed DOI