OBJECTIVES: Five different second-generation supraglottic airway devices, ProSeal LMA, Supreme LMA, i-gel, SLIPA, and Laryngeal Tube Suction-D, were studied. Operators were inexperienced users with a military background, combat lifesavers, nurses, and physicians. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Devices were inserted in the operating room in low light conditions after induction of general anesthesia. Primary outcome was successful insertion on the first attempt while secondary aims were insertion time, number of attempts, oropharyngeal seal pressure, ease of insertion, fibre optic position of device, efficacy of ventilation, and intraoperative trauma or regurgitation of gastric contents. RESULTS: In total, 505 patients were studied. First-attempt insertion success rate was higher in the Supreme LMA (96%), i-gel (87.9%), and ProSeal LMA (85.9%) groups than in the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D (80.6%) and SLIPA (69.4%) groups. Insertion time was shortest in the Supreme LMA (70.4 ± 32.5 s) and i-gel (74.4 ± 41.1 s) groups (p < 0.001). Oropharyngeal seal pressures were higher in the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D and ProSeal LMA groups than in other three devices. CONCLUSIONS: Most study parameters for the Supreme LMA and i-gel were found to be superior to the other three tested supraglottic airway devices when inserted by novice military operators.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Medicine 1st Medical Faculty and General University Hospital U Nemocnice 2 128 08 Prague Czech Republic ; University of East Anglia Norwich Research Park Norwich NR4 7TJ UK

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Medicine 1st Medical Faculty and University Military Hospital U Vojenske Nemocnice 1 169 02 Prague Czech Republic

See more in PubMed

Butler F. K., Jr., Blackbourne L. H. Battlefield trauma care then and now: a decade of Tactical Combat Casualty Care. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2012;73(6, supplement 5):S395–S402. doi: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3182754850. PubMed DOI

Henlin T., Michalek P., Tyll T., Hinds J. D., Dobias M. Oxygenation, ventilation, and airway management in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a review. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:11. doi: 10.1155/2014/376871.376871 PubMed DOI PMC

Combes X., Jabre P., Jbeili C., et al. Prehospital standardization of medical airway management: incidence and risk factors of difficult airway. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2006;13(8):828–834. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.02.016. PubMed DOI

Otten M. Proposed change: supraglottic airways CoTCCC recommendation paper. Journal of Special Operations Medicine. 2013;13(1):77–85. PubMed

Cook T. M., Woodall N., Frerk C. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 2011;106(5):617–631. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. PubMed DOI

Coulson A., Brimacombe J., Keller C., et al. A comparison of the ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airways for airway management by inexperienced personnel after manikin-only training. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2003;31(3):286–289. PubMed

Howes B. W., Wharton N. M., Gibbison B., Cook T. M. LMA SupremeTM insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(4):343–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06262.x. PubMed DOI

Donaldson W., Abraham A., Deighan M., Michalek P. I-gel vs. AuraOnce laryngeal mask for general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation in paralyzed patients. Biomedical Papers. 2011;155(2):155–164. doi: 10.5507/bp.2011.023. PubMed DOI

Wharton N. M., Gibbison B., Gabbott D. A., Haslam G. M., Muchatuta N., Cook T. M. I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(9):991–995. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05542.x. PubMed DOI

Miller D. M., Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(2):136–142. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.02962.x. PubMed DOI

Schalk R., Byhahn C., Fausel F., et al. Out-of-hospital airway management by paramedics and emergency physicians using laryngeal tubes. Resuscitation. 2010;81(3):323–326. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.007. PubMed DOI

Keller C., Brimacombe J. R., Keller K., Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;82(2):286–287. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.2.286. PubMed DOI

Kapila A., Addy E. V., Verghese C., Brain A. I. J. The intubating laryngeal mask airway: an initial assessment of performance. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1997;79(6):710–713. doi: 10.1093/bja/79.6.710. PubMed DOI

Ragazzi R., Finessi L., Farinelli I., Alvisi R., Volta C. A. LMA Supreme vs i-gel—a comparison of insertion success in novices. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(4):384–388. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07002.x. PubMed DOI

Michalek P., Hodgkinson P., Donaldson W. Fiberoptic intubation through an i-gel supraglottic airway in two patients with predicted difficult airway and intellectual disability. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2008;106(5):1501–1504. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816f22f6. PubMed DOI

Chloros T., Xanthos T., Iacovidou N., Bassiakou E. Supreme laryngeal mask airway achieves faster insertion times than classic LMA during chest compressions in manikins. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2014;32(2):156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.10.048. PubMed DOI

Teoh W. H. L., Lee K. M., Suhitharan T., Yahaya Z., Teo M. M., Sia A. T. H. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(12):1173–1179. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06534.x. PubMed DOI

Schalk R., Meininger D., Ruesseler M., et al. Emergency airway management in trauma patients using laryngeal tube suction. Prehospital Emergency Care. 2011;15(3):347–350. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.561405. PubMed DOI

Kikuchi T., Kamiya Y., Ohtsuka T., Miki T., Goto T. Randomized prospective study comparing the laryngeal tube suction II with the proSeal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized and paralyzed patients. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(1):54–60. doi: 10.1097/aln.0b013e318178819b. PubMed DOI

Ruetzler K., Roessler B., Potura L., et al. Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices—a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011;82(5):593–597. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.008. PubMed DOI

Oh S.-K., Lim B. G., Kim H., Lim S. H. Comparison of the clinical effectiveness between the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) and the laryngeal mask airway by novice personnel. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2012;63(2):136–141. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.136. PubMed DOI PMC

Choi Y. M., Cha S. M., Kang H., et al. The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of the pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) compared with the laryngeal mask ProSeal during general anesthesia. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology. 2010;58(5):450–457. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.5.450. PubMed DOI PMC

Nolan J. P., Soar J., Zideman D. A., et al. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2010. Section 1—executive summary. Resuscitation. 2010;81(10):1219–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.021. PubMed DOI

Michalek P., Jindrova B., Kriz P., Stritesky M., Sedlar M. A pilot evaluation of the 3gLM-R—a new supraglottic airway device. Advances in Medical Sciences. 2015;60(2):186–190. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2015.02.001. PubMed DOI

Tiefenthaler W., Eschertzhuber S., Brimacombe J., Fricke E., Keller C., Kaufmann M. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(6):600–604. PubMed

Evaluation of the insertion parameters and complications of the i-gel Plus airway device for maintaining patent airway during planned procedures under general anaesthesia: a protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study

Complications Associated with the Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices in Perioperative Medicine