Transcranial Doppler versus transthoracic echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia: A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, metaanalýza, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy, systematický přehled
PubMed
26833864
DOI
10.1002/ana.24609
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- echokardiografie normy MeSH
- foramen ovale apertum diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- ischemie mozku diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita * MeSH
- ultrasonografie dopplerovská transkraniální normy MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) can be detected in up to 43% of patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia undergoing investigation with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The diagnostic value of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in the detection of PFO in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack has not been compared with that of transcranial Doppler (TCD) using a comprehensive meta-analytical approach. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review to identify all prospective observational studies of patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia that provided both sensitivity and specificity measures of TTE, TCD, or both compared to the gold standard of TEE. RESULTS: Our literature search identified 35 eligible studies including 3,067 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for TCD was 96.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 93.0-97.8%) and 92.4% (95% CI = 85.5-96.1%), whereas the respective measures for TTE were 45.1% (95% CI = 30.8-60.3%) and 99.6% (95% CI = 96.5-99.9%). TTE was superior in terms of higher positive likelihood ratio values (LR+ = 106.61, 95% CI = 15.09-753.30 for TTE vs LR+ = 12.62, 95% CI = 6.52-24.43 for TCD; p = 0.043), whereas TCD demonstrated lower negative likelihood values (LR- = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.02-0.08) compared to TTE (LR- = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.42-0.72; p < 0.001). Finally, the area under the summary receiver operating curve (AUC) was significantly greater (p < 0.001) in TCD (AUC = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.97-0.99) compared to TTE studies (AUC = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.82-0.89). INTERPRETATION: TCD is more sensitive but less specific compared to TTE for the detection of PFO in patients with cryptogenic cerebral ischemia. The overall diagnostic yield of TCD appears to outweigh that of TTE.
1st Department of Neurology Eginition Hospital School of Medicine University of Athens Athens Greece
Department of Neurology School of Medicine University of Patras Patras Greece
Department of Neurology University of Ioannina School of Medicine Ioannina Greece
Department of Neurology University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center Memphis TN
School of Nursing Australian Catholic University Sydney Australia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org